All of my reading of, and listening to master-persuader, Scott Adams, has finally paid o
ff.
How?
I got him to tweet about my new book, PLAGUE OF CORRUPTION, coming out on November 5, 2019, but available for pre-order NOW on Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and Indie-Wire.
Here is the tweet:
@ScottAdamsSays
LOSERTHINK is one of The Three Most Important Books of 2019… – BolenReport
1:39 PM · Sep 13, 2019·Twitter for iPhone
You see, what I did was use a strategy called “Sharing the Stage.”
This is always the problem of the challenger. How do you get the public to view you with a similar level of credibility?
This is why incumbent politicians never want to share the stage with their challenger. It’s also why the challenger wants as many debates as possible.
What I did was similar, but not as confrontational. I was praising the new book, LOSER-THINK, by Scott Adams, the new book, TRIGGERED, by Donald Trump, Jr., then my book. He thinks to himself, “Well, I know my book’s awesome, I assume the book by Donald Trump, Jr. is going to be pretty good, and this guy is putting his book in the same category. I guess it’s true. Let me tweet it out.”
And it’s true. PLAGUE OF CORRUPTION is awesome.
What Scott Adams does not realize (yet)…
…is that it’s likely he’s just triggered the trolls who will viciously attack him for daring to tweet out my book. I’m waiting for that delicious moment.
Because knowing Scott Adams as I do (I think we’ll be going out for coffee in a few weeks if the stars align), when he gets attacked he won’t fold. He’ll just get more angry and double down on promoting my book.
There’s a new breed of independent thinker on the American scene today, like Scott Adams, Joe Rogan, Jordan Peterson, Stephan Molyneaux, and Mike Cernovich, who are likely to be very receptive to the ideals of the Health Freedom Movement.
In fact, Mike Cernovich was at the California State Capitol, covering our state’s wicked attempt to strip away medical exemptions for children. He was shocked by what he saw, going so far as to criticize those who attempt to discount the claims of parents whose children have been injured by vaccines.
This is his tweet from September 9:
Mike Cernovich:
I’ve spent the day with people called “anti-vaxxers.” They are kind, friendly, and involved in their childrens’ lives. This is a maligned group and some of you should be ashamed of yourselves for how you treat and talk about them.
Predictably, that got Cernovich attacked by David Gorski, aka, “Orac”, or as I like to call him, “Orc.”
Here is that exchange:
David Gorski, MD, PhD – Verified account@gorskon
“That’s nice. People can be “kind, friendly, and involved in their children’s lives ” and still be dead wrong about vaccines and spreading misinformation that endangers their and others’ children. That’s what antivaxers are. That’s what they do. That’s why they must be opposed.”
Mike Cernovich replied to Gorksi by writing:
“How many people did BigPharma kill with opioids? Why are you science bros always attacking moms with injured children while refusing to stand up to drug companies that kill? You’re a coward, bro, a bully who attacks moms but would never stand up to billionaire drug dealers. – Mike CernovichVerified account @Cernovich Sep 13″
There is something so refreshing about that healthy masculinity which takes on bullies like Gorski.
Gorski, the orc, doesn’t realize that in Cernovich he’s angered the eight hundred pound gorilla. Gorski is going to be like Loki getting pounded by the Hulk at the end of the first Avengers movie.
And that’s why I tell my enemies that now is the time to attack.
This message goes out to Paul Offit, David Gorski, Peter Hoetez, and Dorit Rubenstein. You must attack Scott Adams and Mike Cernovich this week. They cannot be allowed to maintain their status in the public arena of ideas. I know you can do it.
You have done such a thorough job of trashing the reputations of Dr. Andy Wakefield, Jenny McCarthy, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Dr. Judy Mikovits, and countless others, that I’m sure you can do this one more time.
It’ll be just like the Nazis at the gates of Moscow.
You guys should trust me on this. I really just want the best for you.
I love it!
KENT:
Thanks for providing insight into how the “alternative” media is starting to build. All the real thinkers in this new media group are starting their own podcasts and building their own fan bases and eager to share. Many have youtube channels and other regular outlets for their stuff. They would be more than happy to hear what we anti-vaxxers are talking about. I urge readers of Bolen Report to start looking for these people and letting them know about how we are on a campaign to expose the VAX scandal. Keep up the great work!
Kent:
I doubt that any of the so-called “pro-vaxxers” gender-challenged operatives would even CONSIDER going over into Cernovich-land with Gorski heading the charge in his whiney “sissy-voice.” Not going to happen. Gorski can’t communicate in Twitter mode. He needs to write 14,732 sweaty words where 236 would do.
Can you really envision ANY of the “pro-vax” sociopaths surviving for a minute in Scott Adams-land?
Nope – the “pro-vaxxers” might be scary while attacking overworked, overstressed, mothers of vaccine damaged children – but in Cernovich-land they would INSTANTLY come up against the FULL-MALE of the American breed – those that are STILL charged with the NORMAL amount of testosterone and have a certain look in their eyes.
And in Scott Adams land they’d find no-nonsense educated people that actually have a job…
Kent, Bolen et al, should look at the August court decision in British Columbia. In that case, Penn State’s Dr. Michael (hockey stick) Mann sued warming sceptic Dr. Tim Ball for libel.
In his defence, Ball demanded that Mann reveal (in open court) 100% of the formula he used to make his climate predictions in the first place, using his famous hockey stick figure. Mann refused, claiming this was “proprietary” information that belonged to him personally and not to anyone else.
Mann lost his case over this, and Dr. Tim Ball was awarded HUGE court costs. Mann now is vulnerable to a host of criminal and civil fraud actions in the U.S.A. and elsewhere.
The decision is not yet published, but it is coming. Here is the link: https://principia-scientific.org/rico-racketeering-probe-beckons-after-michael-manns-court-defeat/
The link above is a comment and general discussion about the decision and the case. Here is the link to the decision itself, when it is posted, presumably this month.
https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/
The prime evidence supporting vaccinations is alleged to be the “Danish Study”. Anti-vaxxers might use the same defense strategy that won it for Ball, if they are ever sued by pro-vaxxers in a slapp suit.
If the defamation suit is filed in a state that has no Anti-slapp law, the defense might demand disclosure (subpoena) of this study and the various documents that show it was a hoax, from the plaintiff(s). I expect the result would be the same as for Dr. Ball.
What say you, Kent, Bolen, et al?
Where government takes an official position on an issue, I expect that a civil plaintiff would have a duty to disclose any exculpatory information in its possession, to the defendant, when it comes to enforcement of a state’s interest. Anything less would be malpractice by the DA, or the plaintiff’s lawyer in a civil case. It seems that way from the Ball case.
Just my opinion