Just WHAT ARE these Children’s Rights that California Senator Richard Pan Speaks of?

Part 4 in the developing, “California State Senator Richard “The State Owns Your Child” Pan is At it Again…”

Opinion by Karri Lewis AWAKE California

While California Senator Richard Pan is frantically sending out feel-good media propaganda pieces in a desperate attempt to cover-up the fact that Senate Bill 18 gives the state complete control over ALL California children, word is spreading.

Senate Bill 18 allows "professionals" approved by the state to make these decisions and more for your child.
Senate Bill 18 allows “professionals” approved by the state to make these decisions and more for your child.

In John Rappoport’s excellent article, Bombshell: sacrificing children to the state of California: SB18,” the unraveling of WHO and WHY is behind Senate Bill 18 becomes clear.

Rappoport says:

“Catch the flavor of the wording. It emerges like swamp gas: “The Legislature finds and declares that all children and youth, regardless of gender, class, race, ethnicity, national origin, culture, religion, immigration status, sexual orientation, or ability, have inherent rights that entitle them to protection, special care, and assistance, including, but not limited to, the following: The right to parents, guardians, or caregivers who act in their best interest. The right to form healthy attachments with adults responsible for their care and well-being. The right to live in a safe and healthy environment. The right to social and emotional well-being. The right to opportunities to attain optimal cognitive, physical, and social development. The right to appropriate, quality education and life skills leading to self-sufficiency in adulthood. The right to appropriate, quality health care.”

As if all these outcomes could be delivered to children on a silver platter.

And the State would make it so?

This bill is basically setting up the population of California for state regulatory agencies to fill in the blanks later, to make specific controls out of the vague generalities in the bill. Get it?  “Medical care and nutrition and parenting and education are what we say they are. We define and enforce, you obey.”

Rappoport goes on to explain WHERE all of this is coming from:


“But let’s go to the money. In SB18, a group is referred to: the Peninsula Partnership Leadership Council. This Council has already written a children’s bill of rights, and SB18 is saying this is the model. This is the framework. This the pattern they’re following.

That’s odd.

Pay attention. This is where it becomes VERY interesting.
The Peninsula Partnership is a group organized within the San Mateo County Office of Education. One piddling little California county education department.

The Peninsula Partnership Leadership Council (PPLC) is composed of the San Mateo County Superintendent of Schools, the County Board of Supervisors and the Silicon Valley Community Foundation.



It’s a non-profit that has assets of $7.3 BILLION. It runs 1800 philanthropic funds. Here are some of its corporate partners:
Alexza Pharmaceuticals. Microsoft. Pepsico Foundation. Cisco. Hewlett Packard. Dell. Symantec. Unilever. Plus something called the SV2 Silicon Valley Social Venture Fund, “building and scaling social inventions.”

For some reason, this huge Foundation is pushing a children’s bill of rights that is reflected in a new CA bill, SB18, that will eventually make the State the top-dog controlling force over all children in California.

You can bet these corporate partners will reap profits. Beyond that, this is their version of a MASSIVE social engineering program. And that program is part of a technocratic movement to plan, format, and run the lives of the population from cradle to grave, because…

The hi-tech scientists and engineers know best.

It’s that stark.”

In addition to Common Sense Media, we have all of these other corporate beneficiaries that stand to profit off of Senator Richard Pan’s SB18.

Wow! What a HUMONGOUS financial boon and consumer capture for these corporations!

Parents, doesn’t it make you feel good that Senator Richard Pan wants to sell your parental rights over to a bunch of what some are calling satanic, child molesters (scroll to about 1/3 of the way down the page) and corporate profiteers?


Back to the topic at hand…

Just WHAT ARE these Children’s Rights that Senator Richard Pan speaks of?

Let’s take a look…

As I was researching, I came across a short 35 minute documentary,  Overruled: Government Invasion of your Parental Rights.

Boy, was that video absolutely eye-opening and thought-provoking!

If you have not seen it, I highly recommend clicking on the above link and watching it for yourself.

The main take-away from this documentary is about how our involvement with the United Nations has led to the stealing (globalization) of our children and the gifting of them to the state through our state legislators.

This all began on February 16, 1995, when then President Bill Clinton, had secretary of state, Madeleine Albright sign the “United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child TREATY.”

According to Wikipedia:

“However, though generally supportive of the Convention, President Bill Clinton did not submit it to the Senate.[6] Likewise, President Bush did not submit the Convention to the Senate. President Barack Obama has described the failure to ratify the Convention as ’embarrassing’ and has promised to review this.[7][8] The Obama administration has said that it intends to submit the Convention to the Senate, but there is no set timeline for it.[9]

States may, when ratifying the Convention, ratify subject to reservations or interpretations. Besides other obligations, ratification of the Convention would require the United States to submit reports, outlining its implementation on the domestic level, to the U.N. Committee on the Rights of the Child, a panel of child rights experts from around the world. Parties must report initially two years after acceding to (ratifying) the Convention and then every five years.[10]

Homeschool Legal Defense Association describes, The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, as “The Most Dangerous Attack on Parents’ Rights In the History of the United States:

According to the Supremacy Clause in Article VI of the U.S. Constitution, a treaty directly applies to all citizens in the United States. Article VI, Section 2 states:

“All treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution of the laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.”

Looks like it’s time to ask President Trump to get us out of the United Nations and untangle ourselves from, “The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.”

Taking Away Parental Rights, One State at a Time…

Washington State has already enacted a bill similar to Senate Bill 18 and has had so many problems and complaints from parents that they had to scale back on some of the laws that they were implementing.

Take a look at the language of Washington’s children’s rights statute – RCW 13.34.020 – and then we’ll look at how Washington government agencies actually used it.

Legislative declaration of family unit as resource to be nurtured—Rights of child.

“The legislature declares that the family unit is a fundamental resource of American life which should be nurtured. Toward the continuance of this principle, the legislature declares that the family unit should remain intact unless a child’s right to conditions of basic nurture, health, or safety is jeopardized. When the rights of basic nurture, physical and mental health, and safety of the child and the legal rights of the parents are in conflict, the rights and safety of the child should prevail. In making reasonable efforts under this chapter, the child’s health and safety shall be the paramount concern. The right of a child to basic nurturing includes the right to a safe, stable, and permanent home and a speedy resolution of any proceeding under this chapter.”

According to www.parentalrights.org, “Wash. Rev. Code § 13.34.020 affirms parental rights as fundamental, although strict scrutiny is not mentioned.”

To pass “strict scrutiny,” the legislature must have passed the law to further a “compelling governmental interest,” and must have narrowly tailored the law to achieve that interest.

So, just below, is the reality of how liberal-communist Washington bureaucrats used the law against parents.

“A thirteen-year-old boy in Washington State was removed from his parents after he complained to school counselors that his parents took him to church too often. His school counselors had encouraged him to call Child Protective Services with his complaint, which led to his subsequent removal and placement in foster care. It was only after the parents agreed to a judge’s requirement of less-frequent church attendance that they were able to recover their son.2

Once reported and in the system, parental decisions are ultimately made by a random Washington State judge in a state appointed dog and pony show, which includes a court-appointed “professional” to represent your child.

Got that?

Washington state even has a special bathroom law that gives special privileges to child predators… but I digress.

What to DO Next…

As Senate Bill 18, is pre-packaged and sold to the mainstream media as a wonderful idea, with new protections for children, it’s very important for all freedom loving citizens to get the word out.

Speak out and inform your school boards, city councils, townhalls, friends and family.

The only way to beat this horrific bill is with the TRUTH.

 Talk about Kidzworld.

Talk about 65% of the kids found in child trafficking rings are wards of the state.

Talk about the sponsors of this bill.

Talk about Senator Richard Pan and all of the money he is making passing bills that infringe on YOUR Parental Rights.

Get on the email list of parentalrights.org

Folks, it’s up to you.  Do not leave it to anyone else.

Opinion by Karri Lewis AWAKE California

4 thoughts on “Just WHAT ARE these Children’s Rights that California Senator Richard Pan Speaks of?”

  1. OMG! I ran away from Soviet Union and I got it here in full blown socialist-nazy-comunist state driven nonsense! Why? Why? Why?

  2. Well, the ‘health’ depts started with your pets and you let them dictate vaxxing unlimited… so now for cats those aggressive sarcomas at vax sites are numbering 160,000 fatalities a year but the ‘health’ depts continue. The frankenstein-loyal veterinarian AVMA advocates injecting your pet’s legs so when the sarcomas appear the veterinarians can cut off you pet’s legs… true humane health advising and it is law for as long as we allow it to be law. Holistic veterinarians try to dissuade so many injections but it’s tragic comedy of the insane type. Agreed? The slippery slope was instituted already……. And like the human version of these feared diseases, the antidote for the cat diseases is non-toxic, relatively inexpensive intravenous ascorbate……..Possibly historically we can make them regret ever creating this slippery slope. Wanna try?

  3. While it is true that America has two Left Coasts, California is getting even crazier than New York and Massachusetts.

    If this plan is implemented the results will be opposite the results predicted by its proponents.

    Rather than improving the lives of children, and fostering a prosperous California, this plan will generate generations of dumbed-down Delta Workers to compete with the low-wage slaves of Asia.

    But maybe that’s the real goal of Dr. Richard Mengele and Gov. Jerry Brownshirt and their crony corporate sponsors.

    Tell Trump to Stop Vax Mandates here: http://tinyurl.com/vaccinepolicy

  4. It seems that even some of those Silicon Valley types have now red-pilled with the pizzagate information coming out. Hopefully, as with the election, enough people are awake and right in the head.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.