There Is NO Difference Between “Forced Vaccination” Programs And What The NAZI Doctor’s Did In The WWII Death Camps…
And We Tried, and EXECUTED, Those Doctors At Nuremberg..
Opinion by Ralph Fucetola JD
Across the United States legislators are demanding “tougher laws” forcing families to vaccinate, or lose public benefits. That these same legislators are beneficiaries of significant drug company political payments is not surprising.
These new efforts are triggered by a small up-tick in the few cases of measles. More children die from the “unavoidably unsafe” measles vaccine than from the disease itself.
What is surprising is the legislators willing connivance with those who push forced vaccination as somehow a “public health benefit,” despite the failure of the US government to provide any of the vaccine safety reports that have been required by law since 1986.
When Congress abrogated our right to petition…
…the federal and state courts for vaccine injuries in 1986 the promise was that vaccines would become safer and that the federal government would report to Congress annually about progress. No such reports have been submitted while families have suffered thousands of dead and maimed children as the legacy of US vaccination policy.
The horrors of vaccine pseudo-science could, perhaps, have been tolerated, since families could have, in the past, always opt out of vaccination for religious or philosophical reasons. Where there is risk, there must be choice. However, that promise of “Informed Consent” is now under concerted attack in state after state.
Exemptions created by legislators can be abolished, it is claimed, by legislators.
That’s may be accurate, but only if the change in law does not violate our inalienable rights.
Legislators must understand international limits on their asserted power over the issue of forced vaccination. Wars have consequences and one of the consequences of WWII was the enactment, as part of customary international law, binding on all nations, of the Nuremberg Code.
The US government, during the Subsequent Nuremberg Trials, and specifically the infamous Nazi Doctors Trial, promulgated the Nuremberg Code, as a restatement of the existing law of Informed Consent. It tried and hung Nazi Doctors for crimes against humanity — violating the universal right of Informed Consent.
It did so under the Geneva Convention provisions that say a power holding a prisoner of war may try the prisoner for war crimes only if the same law applies to the country holding the prisoner.
Here are the EXACT Geneva Convention “Informed Consent” Words:
“The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.”
Thus, by action of the Geneva Conventions the Nuremberg Code applies in the USA.
I’ve written a detailed Brief on the Law of Informed Consent here: http://drrimatruthreports.com/a-brief-for-informed-consent/ — showing how subsequent international law (including the UN Bioethics Declaration), US statutory law and cases support the right.
In 1914, Judge (later Supreme Court Justice) Benjamin Cardozo validated the concept of voluntary consent when he noted that every human being has a right to decide what shall be done with his or her body, deeming medical intervention without Informed Consent an unlawful trespass:
“Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body; and a surgeon who performs an operation without his patient’s consent commits an assault for which he is liable in damages.” Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hosp.,105 N.E. 92, 93 (N.Y. 1914)
In one recent case, Missouri v McNeely, 569 US 141 (2013) the Supreme Court said, even a “…diminished expectation of privacy does not diminish the… privacy interest in preventing a government agent from piercing the… skin. And though a blood test conducted in a medical setting by trained personnel is less intrusive than other bodily invasions, this Court has never retreated from its recognition that any compelled intrusion into the human body implicates significant, constitutionally protected privacy interests…” (page 15).
The relevant point is that legislators, whether state or federal, have no authority to disregard the right of Informed Consent.
If they do so, they too stand in the Nuremberg Docket with the Nazi Doctors. There is no middle ground. Either a politician stands for the universal right of Informed Consent or is aiding and abetting crimes against humanity.
Conscientious objectors to vaccination must assert our universal right to Informed Consent, separate from any legislative exemptions, in order to preserve it. Learn more here: http://tinyurl.com/AVDcard
While Vancouver declared an “outbreak” over 9 measles cases, Los Angeles has suffered a dramatic increase in typhus cases, from 2 in 2017 to at least 120 in 2018 with barely a mention in the drug-company-advertising dependent mass media. Maybe because there is no commercially available typhus vaccine?
Opinion By Ralph Fucetola JD