WHO Says Vaccine Conscientious Objectors Threat to Globalism…

Are You A Threat?

“The World Health Organization rolled out its top ten threats to global health in 2019, and “Vaccine Hesitancy” made the list…

By Ralph Fucetola JD

The “Mad Vaxxers” are losing and they know it.

Since 2009, the number of ‘philosophical-belief’ vaccine non-medical exemptions has risen in 12 of the 18 states that currently allow this policy… ” www.theblaze.com/news/who-anti-vaccine-threat-health

So WHO has cited “measles outbreaks” as “proof” that increased conscientious objections to vaccination is harmful to public health, despite scientific evidence to the contrary.

Was a historic apparent ‘decrease’ in measles caused by vaccines . . . or despite it?

Here is the evidence-based science view, rather than the pro-vaxx position of pharmaceutical-supported WHO.

“What is clear is that the official figures for the incidence of measles during the 1960s are probably highly inaccurate, and thus unreliable.

A typical measles [caused by vaccines] was not taken into account, and doctors likely overlooked or misdiagnosed many cases of measles in children who had been vaccinated for the disease. …

While the number of reported cases of measles went up and down from year to year, the overall trend line was downward. In fact, the trend line had been going down since 1941, when the number of reported cases totaled 894,134. Interestingly, in 1964 (the year after the introduction of the first killed measles vaccine), the number of reported cases of measles actually went up to 458,083.

… In short, what happened with reported measles cases in the 1960s is similar to what happened with reported polio cases in the 1950s.

In both cases, a vaccine was introduced that was given credit for nearly wiping out the disease it was designed to combat. The vaccines were so widely hailed that the public came to view them as miracle cures to infectious disease, when, in fact, the evidence does not confirm that belief.”

www.thevaccinereaction.org/2016/04/the-story-of-measles-sharp-decline-2/

Virtually all (over 90%) of USA measles cases have been vaccinated ‘against’ measles.

Clearly, recent outbreaks have been triggered by vaccination and viral shedding. Information provided by both manufacturers and the CDC identifies measles disease as a “side effect” of measles vaccination.

Repeat: MEASLES is a “SIDE EFFECT” of the Measles Vaccine! 

If vaccination “works” then the vaccinated have nothing to fear from those who choose to exercise their universal right of Informed Consent to reject this medical intervention. Every person has the legally protected right of Informed Consent to accept or reject any medical intervention for any reason, or no reason at all,  see: https://tinyurl.com/AVDcard

Another irrational and deceptive claim is that “only” live-virus vaccines can cause viral shedding and possibly infect others. There is no such thing as a “live” virus. Any shed viral particle is potential infectious.

Yet another propaganda-based claim is that vaccine-spread disease is “rare.

There is clear evidence that viral shedding is a common, not a rare event, and occurs in a significant number of vaccinated persons.

This is not limited to any particular vaccine, but occurs in all viral vaccines. In the case of the MMR vaccine, here is what Merck informs the public in the product insert:

“Excretion of small amounts of the live attenuated rubella virus from the nose or throat has occurred in the majority of susceptible individuals 7 to 28 days after vaccination…”  www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/m/mmr_ii/mmr_ii_pi.pdf

Evidence-based science demands that WHO immediately amend its 2019 Threats to Global Health list…

…to remove vaccine conscientious objectors and include vaccines and the dangerous people who use them instead. Since courts around the world have held vaccines to be “unavoidably unsafe”* once you are informed how can you consent?

Unless you assert your right to Informed Consent correctly that right will be deemed waived. Learn how to do so here:  https://tinyurl.com/AVDcard

Protecting the right of Informed Consent against unscientific pro-vaxx propaganda should be the policy of every enlightened public health agency. That is what WHO is required to do by the UN Bioethics Declaration.

Vaccine conscientious objectors are a “threat” to the globalist agencies and crony drug companies. Pushing vaccination as a public policy is bad science, violates the law and is just plain wrong.

SHARE THIS MESSAGE ON YOUR SOCIAL MEDIA:  http://drrimatruthreports.com/who-says-vaccine-conscientious-objectors-threat-to-global-health/

Ralph Fucetola JD
President Institute for Health Research
www.InHeRe.org

Trustee and Counsel
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.DrRimaTruthReports.com

 

7 thoughts on “WHO Says Vaccine Conscientious Objectors Threat to Globalism…”

  1. Agenda 21 is a threat to humanity. It is the deep state, globalist, NWO, BIG PHARMA path to enslavement and extermination similar to driving sheep over a cliff. Ownership of property by individuals and communities and ownership of resources by countries as well as democracy must be exterminated to achieve its agenda.
    Vaccination are a major increment of stealth towards this evil agenda.

  2. Terry Harnden, you are right. I couldn’t agree with you more. It’s all the hidden Agenda to deal with the sheeple, the undesirable excess. What is very sad, that we have a Divine warning and despite this, those who claim and bragging about their Biblical scholarships are looking the other way and barking at the wrong tree.The book of Revelation is the source or things to be reviled to the troubled mankind in these crucial times, the last days.Man fail to understand that the whole UN organization is a demonic inspiration to underhandedly destroy humanity.

  3. Thanks Ralph,
    there are, however, a few “errors” in your statistics:-

    Firstly, measles and especially measles deaths have been in decline since 1860 not 1941! Measles vaccination has had no discernible effect upon this decline. Indeed, measles deaths in Europe had reached a probable zero TEN YEARS before a vaccine was introduced!
    The decline in the incidence of measles (and the wobbles in the statistics) are, for the most part, due to this process becoming perceived as harmless and so not being reported counteracted by occasional measles scares from the pseudo-medical industry as at present.
    See https://www.tprip.com for much more on this.

    It was one of the developers of the polio “vaccine” (I forget his name at the moment) who stated before a Congressional Committee that, in his opinion, all polio cases since 1964 were caused by the vaccine. This accords with all other comparison studies which, despite claims that such had never been carried out because, according to Merck & friends, it would be unethical to deny anyone “the obvious benefits of vaccination”, universally show that vaccination spreads disease. If you know how human immunity actually functions, this is precisely the effect that you would expect. Again, much more on this on tprip.com as above.

    The final unanswered question which everyone needs to bear in mind is this, “If there is good scientific evidence that vaccination works, why are the pharmaceutical manufacturers completely unable to present such for scrutiny?”

    Blessed be

    Karma

  4. A recent development in GENE technology may shut the mad-vaxxers up permanently.

    There is now a rapid gene-identifying process that can distinguish between the different strains of the measles virus AND in its application to the California ‘outbreak’ in 2015 iirc, nearly half the viral evidence turned out to be VAX-SOURCED… apparently the manufacturers use one or other of about 6 strains that the techniques rapidly knows to identify.

    So rotfl, we can now wonder exactly which strains are used in those unoverseen manufacturing operations in China or if its the FDA-overseen manufacturers… eh? the fun gets better… ttyl

  5. A doctor friend who’s also a JD, suggested we solve these problems with Ralph’s battle over AMA coding as an obstacle to decent do-no-harm care by my friend’s favored law suggestion:

    A “Freedom of Health Care Choice Act” that basically said
    your insurance company had to cover whatever you the patient wanted as treatment.

    And the treachery incarnated AMA-drug-trap all comes tumbling down.

    So I figure if Ralph knew of such a ‘model law’ then we could all present it to our various state legislators who seem friendly for such legislators to customize to that state’s forms and get this dynamite launched….. any clues, Ralph?
    TTYL

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *