For some years now there has been a reward of 100,000 Deutsche Marks (about $112,000) for hard proof that viruses exist…
From Germany By Karma Singh
One would think that there must be hundreds of people in the pharmaceutical industry, the CDC, the FDA etc., et.al. who could easily pocket this reward by laying the proof upon the table.
NOT SO! Only one has even tried, he chose the measles virus as his proof and he failed!
He even went to Germany’s highest court in an attempt to get the prize.
The problem he had, as the judges rightly pointed out, was that his evidence was not continuous. He tried to claim the prize with a sheaf of different scientific papers none of which proved the existence of viruses.
His attempt, however, was based upon the concept of “inference,” i.e. he said that because report a) says this and report b) this and report c) this etc., we must infer that they, taken together, prove the existence of the measles virus.
Now “inference”, in scientific circles, is an “upper class” word for “guess” so he was saying that guesswork proves the existence of the measles virus. The judges, whose business it is to weigh evidence impartially, disagreed and told him, in December 2016, that guesswork is NOT proof!
The reward is still unclaimed today.
Oddly enough, although I had been aware of the work of Gaston Naessens for some years, it didn’t occur to me until I read the report mentioned above that Neassens’ discoveries showed that the existence of viruses is extremely unlikely.
So, what is this attenuated thing that our children are being injected with, ostensibly to prevent measles?
Even more germane; where does the concept of viruses itself originate?
After those two charlatans, Pasteur and Koch, foisted their now completely disproven dogma of infectious disease upon humanity, there began to appear a sheaf of diseases where no “causational” bacteria could be found.
In 1892 the Russian botanist Dmitri Iosifovich Ivanovsky postulated the existence of pathogenic agents too small to be seen with the microscopes of his day. He named these organisms viruses. Over the ensuing years, many others jumped onto the band wagon as the postulate appeared to justify the “infectious disease” dogma even though no pathological agents could be found.
There is an interesting side-note here, part of the continuing bias on Wikipedia towards pharmaceutical medicine and suppressing anything which may detract from pharma-profits (in which Wikipedia shares). In the article on Dmitri Iosifovich Ivanovsky it is stated that he and his fellow botanist Martinus Willem Beijerinck from the Netherlands “discovered” and not merely theorised about the existence of viruses.
Until 1932, when both of these scientists had already completed their incarnations, there was no microscope available which could “see” anything so small as the postulated virus. Even today, the very, very best optical microscope will only magnify up to 2500 times – much too little to see the theoretical viruses.
In 1932, the electron microscope was invented.
With magnification up to 7000 times, it is capable of showing things that small. There are, however, drawbacks. The electron microscope can only view dead, immobile objects and only in black and white, never in colour.
Any coloured picture you may have seen in a magazine or online purporting to be that of a virus is not a photograph of the putative virus at all but an artist’s impression of what it MIGHT look like, i.e. photoshopped!
When the electron microscope began to show previously unknown particles common to sufferers of the same malady, it was immediately inferred (i.e. guessed – see above) that these must be the postulated viruses.
However, as they could never been seen live, there was no way of knowing whether these dust like particles were causational viruses or an effect of the “illness” as Pierre Bechamp, Pasteur’s professor in the university of Paris, had postulated many decades earlier but could not prove without a much better microscope. So, the existence of viruses remains, to this day, a blind guess with no scientific basis as the panel of judges in Germany’s highest court has already ruled.
We now turn our attention to Gaston Naessens. Born and educated in France and who later emigrated to Canada where he completed his life’s work. Naessens invented a completely new principle in microscopy which made it possible to view living organisms at more than 20,000 times magnification. Whether this is similar to that invented by Royal Raymond Rife a few decades earlier is unknowable as that mass-murderer, Morris Fishbein, then director of the American Medical Association, had had all of his devices destroyed.
What Naessens discovered is that the human body will produce micro-proteins which he called “Somatids” as a reaction to sickness. These somatids have the task of breaking up damaged cells before they can transfer their sickness to other cells. When the sickness is over, the somatids return to their dormant state.
This is why almost all known “pathogens” are to being found in completely healthy individuals but in a dormant state. When needed, your own body will call them into action to prevent diseases spreading. In short, there are no randomly invading pathogens but natural healing systems built into your body from conception onwards.
Naessens’ work proved Bechamp’s 19th century hypothesis…
…and thus hammered the final nail into the coffin of Pasteur’s and Koch’s hypothesis of infectious disease.
So, now let us return our attention to the measles “vaccine”. What, exactly, is this “attenuated virus” which purports to prevent measles in our children?
We have, in previous articles as well as in the book www.tprip.com, seen that measles is not in any way a sickness but the process by which your body switches your liver into full function following the 4½ years necessary development.
When this process is complete, your liver naturally produces a protein signifying its adult function. I.e., this protein is a natural effect of the additional liver functions which the measles has “switched on”. This protein bears, of course, the genetic “signature” of that particular human being. It is this protein which pharmaceutical medicine extracts and attenuates (makes half-dead) and then injects, together with huge quantities of neurotoxins etc., into our children.
This has one of two possible effects:-
1) In very young children, it can cause the liver to attempt to transform into the adult state long before the adult liver is present: The baby liver then goes into self-destruct mode resulting in the organ failure which kills many babies and toddlers each year.
2) In older children it can cause your body to “believe” that the awakening of the liver has already taken place. Because, however, the liver has not been awakened to the adult state, the injected protein is effective for a limited time-span only as the liver does not constantly produce it afresh.
Additionally, as it is genetically foreign matter, your own immune system will tend to destroy it. This is the well-known phenomenon of the “disappearance” of the immunity which the vaccine purports to give. The nett result of this is that the liver maturing process is pushed off to much later in life when it is out of phase with other maturing processes causing a great deal of chaos labelled “serious illness”.
It is, therefore, clear that the sole beneficiaries of the measles vaccine are the pharmaceutical companies.
Not only does no benefit accrue to the recipients of their vaccines but a very great deal of harm, both physical and mental, is caused instead.
Time for a change.
From Germany By Karma Singh