The Most-Attacked Health Advocate On the Face of The Earth…

Big pharma is in trouble in America.  They’re losing the battle between health and medicine.  They’re fighting a desperate, and evil, battle. But, despite the fortune they’re spending, they’re not going to win.  The North American Health Freedom Movement is too much for them.

Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen

Big pharma, through their “quackbuster” operation run out of a New York advertising agency, has designed, and executed, a program to “do in” those that cut into their obscene profits. The whole supplement industry, as well as oxygen therapies, colloidal silver, electro-medicine, etc., for instance, is targeted.  Laboratories and testing devices are under attack.  Even activists are under attack.  Big pharma writes a lot of checks.

Interestingly, we, as health freedom advocates, sometimes don’t realize the “big picture” big pharma is trying to fight. They need to discredit the WHOLE IDEA OF “HEALTH.” They need to protect the status quo of drug “treatment.” They cannot let the idea of “prevention” or “cure” take hold. And, they absolutely cannot allow the idea of “self-health,” the idea that we the people should be responsible for our own health, to grow in the minds of Planet Earth’s population.

To accomplish their goals, big pharma needs to attack the health EDUCATORS – and discredit them any way they can.  That’s what this article is about.

Almost every health educator on Planet Earth has been attacked at one time or another. Book authors in the venue are used to it. Big pharma has its minions in place. If nothing else, an article will appear on that failed MD Stephen Barrett’s propaganda website

The most-attacked health advocate on the face of the earth in the last ten years, is a five foot four inch, 76 year old woman with a twinkle in her eye that indicates a giant intelligence. Raised in a Mennonite environment of “self-help” this woman generates spittle in the boardrooms of big pharma. She sends pharma CEOs into near seizure, for she, in her books, gives the people of Planet Earth sometimes simple, and sometimes difficult, procedures and programs to rid their bodies of life-threatening, and life-limiting issues, and no drugs are involved.

Her name is Hulda Regehr Clark, and she’s an author, research scientist and health humanitarian.  She’s one of the finest humans on the face of the earth. She ONLY looks outward – towards solving humanity’s health issues.  I’ve known her, personally, since September of 1999.

What makes her so dangerous?

the_cure_for_all_cancersHulda Regehr Clark PhD, Naturopath’s “The Cure For All Diseases” book sells in the top one tenth of one percent of all books on Her other three major books, “The Cure for All Cancers, The Cure For All Advanced Cancers, and the Cure For HIV/AIDS” aren’t far behind. This fact alone puts “the quackbusters,” the real ones, those operating out of that New York ad agency, into a rage.  She scares big pharma to death, with good reason. She has millions of supporters; lay people, health professionals, health advocates, legislators…

I put together a whole website
( a few years ago about this issue – and I wasn’t telling even half of the problem. The attack on Clark should be studied by every health the_cure_for_all_diseasesadvocate on the planet, for it outlines, in detail, the modus operandi designed and used by that New York ad agency to attack “health” advocates world-wide. Against Clark, they’ve pulled almost every trick – and although they tire her, the adversity just makes her work harder, and accomplish more. Since Clark cares little about money and the trappings of success, big pharma’s not hurting her by forcing her to defend against an onslaught of frivolous lawsuits perpetrated by quackbuster minions.  And, her supporters come to her aid.

What Makes Clark So Dangerous? It’s Simple…

Clark has simple, common sense solutions to health problems. For instance, her whole “CURE” idea.

the_cure_for_hiv_and_aidsClark says in her cancer book: “The word cure in the title was chosen, rather than treatment, because it is scientifically accurate. When the true cause of an illness has been found and, by removing it, the illness can be stopped or prevented, a true cure has also been found. When the cause is not found but the symptoms have been removed, helpful as this is, you have only found a treatment. My research was a search for the causes of cancer, how they might be removed, and whether their removal would lead to the relief from the disease. I did not merely search for relief from the disease as most regular cancer research does. Even research into gene-replacement does not address the cause of numerous mutations in cancer. Nor does finding better ways to kill tumor cells. They are treatments.”

the_cure_for_all_cancers__chineseThen she goes on to say “Syncrometer testing technology described in this book makes searching for causes and cures possible. Hopefully, there will be a return to a search for the cure for diseases like diabetes, heart disease, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s, and a lot of others that are now simply being treated.”

What makes Hulda Clark so dangerous? That’s an easy answer – she’s RIGHT in what she says. We all know it. People do what she says. Millions of people. Other health practitioners have reached the same conclusions Clark has.  So have Universities, and other scientists.  But Clark’s books are everywhere.  That’s the difference.  She’s found out how to reach the people.

So, What’s Clark’s Basic Idea?

labcoverEasy. She says that to prevent or cure a disease you only have to normalize the body. Normal bodies successfully deal with issues every day, 24 hours a day. It is the abnormalities that cause problems. These abnormalities, by themselves sometimes, or in combinations, are the causes of all the diseases she’s looked at in her research. To correct the situation by normalizing the body, she says: (1) remove all toxins, but especially five specific toxins, (2) get rid of certain parasites,  (3) kill off certain oncoviruses and their hosts, and (4) get rid of certain bacterias and yeasts. (5) and, normalize the body’s oxidation.

It is this procedure, this program, this recommendation, that has caused her to be german2the “The Most-Attacked Health Advocate On the Face of The Earth…” This, and three other things – her (a ) “Syncrometer” and (b) her “Zapper,”  and (c) the fact that her books are read all over the world – printed in 20 major languages.

Clark – Explained…

Clark is easy to understand if you start at the beginning, and grasp her programs as a whole.  Her 21 day cancer program, for instance, is designed to accomplish all five of her “normalizing” functions at once, over a 21 day period – toxin removal, parasite removal, killing oncoviruses and their hosts, getting rid of certain bacterias and yeast, and normalizing the body’s oxidation.  21 days to remove the cause, and let the body heal.


hoito_kaikkiin_frontWhat gets complicated is “how” you can tell which toxins, etc., are present, and “how” Clark wants you to remove those causes.  For the first, Clark teaches you how to use the Syncrometer.  For the second, I’ll let you read the book for that.

Clark is Under Assault Again…

You’d think, after nine or ten defeats, the quackbusters would just crawl back in the sewer and lick their wounds, but they won’t.  There is too much at stake.  Clark is too big a threat to big pharma.  More, and more people read her books.  More, and more practitioners emulate her ideas.  More and more people understand the difference between a treatment and a cure.  It isn’t a matter of WANTING to try to stop Clark, big pharma HAS TO stop Clark.  Their very big-buck existence is at stake.  “Big pharma” would become “little pharma” if hungarianeveryone realized the difference between treatment and cure.

I went to a meeting last Wednesday, with a group of attorneys gearing up to defend against the latest onslaught.  There, I read the statements of the latest “testifying whores” that the New York advertising agency was able to dig up out of the cabbage patch.  I had to laugh at the opposition’s presentation.  Some people, especially those who didn’t sparkle that well in their own careers, will say anything for money.

What’s different about the current assault is that the usual “quackbusters” like Stephen Barrett, Bobbie Baratz. etc., aren’t openly involved.  The New York ad agency has moved them to a secondary role, I think.  The whole thing is being la_cura_di_tutte_le_malattiehandled by what I have reason to believe are the “quackbusters” that are employees of one of our government agencies.

The new assault against Clark is an “Operation Cure-All” assault, and we already know that we’re dealing here, with an agency that doesn’t seem to exist.  It, apparently has no director, no funding, no offices, no employees, and no one supervising its activities.

But, we’ll get to the bottom of it, now won’t we?

If you haven’t personally met Hulda Clark, you can catch her presentation at the Rife Conference 2003 ( in Seattle, September 26th, 27th, and 28th, 2003.  In fact, you can meet me (Tim Bolen) there too….

Stay tuned…

Tim Bolen – Consumer Advocate