I was starting to write an article suggesting that President Trump’s VACCINE SAFETY COMMISSION should take a hard look at the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).
Why? The Liberal Democrats claim the AAP as their do all, be all, INDEPENDENT experts on everything from vaccines to proper child care. So much so that they OFFICIALLY wrote them into California’s Mandatory Vaccine Bill (SB 277) as THE ULTIMATE AUTHORITY…
More, this AAP was the one who published in their journal those original “studies” claiming that vaccines did NOT cause autism. Yeah, THAT AAP.
Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen
The AAP is NOT What it Appears to be…
They are something entirely different.
I had written an earlier article about who the AAP really is, who is funding them, and what they were really up to way back in 2011. It was called “Want to Keep Your Baby Healthy? Stay Away From Pediatricians… “. And it said:
“I’ll be blunt. Pediatricians, these days, are con-men – only here to push more-and-more dangerous, useless(?), vaccines on an unsuspecting public. They have absolutely no other function.
They are, in fact, a whole section of US medicine that we could well do without. It didn’t used to be that way – but it is now.
Supposedly, Pediatricians developed as child specialists – and, to hear their representatives talk, they are the one-stop shop for all health issues pertaining to children.
Bull…”
In that article I had pointed out that the AAP, in 2010, all together amassed $126,189,033.00 in total 2010 income. WHERE they got that money was no mystery. It was all right there on their IRS tax form 990s. Mine was a compelling argument against the AAP claiming to be AN INDEPENDENT VACCINE AUTHORITY.
So, I wanted Bobby Kennedy Jr’s Vaccine Safety Commission to look CLOSELY at who these people really are, and determine what their role is as vaccine pushers, force-stabbing innocent American children with Made-in-China death pus tubelets.
But, as I usually do, I started asking around about the subject to see if there was anything else of interest I didn’t already know. That’s when a California activist friend of mine (with school-age children) said: “Did you know that Pediatricians will take your child into private room and question them about whether or not there are guns in your house?”
THAT got my attention.
To me, anyone who wants to know where I keep my guns is up to no good. Yeah, I am DEFINITELY one of those. It was time to broaden the scope of my inquiry.
And then life REALLY got interesting…
So, let’s look at who these AAP people really are…
I was shocked to find out that the AAP were, actually, ultra-liberal gun control whackos – and if they could get a child alone, they questioned them about how many guns their parents had in the house and where they kept them. Then what did they do with that information?
I’ll link you to their policy on that below.
Isn’t THAT interesting?
But it was NOTHING compared to what I found next.
Few know that in 2010 the AAP started promoting the idea of training American Pediatricians to, in their offices, do what they called “a nick” – removing a girl-child’s clitoris.
I kid you not. They REALLY did this.
Although Female Genitalia Mutilation (FGM) is illegal in every State, and by US law, the AAP began to pressure legislators to change that law claiming that over 500,000 American little girls had to be taken out of the country to get this surgery done – and that “they” the pediatricians, could do it better, and cheaper, here.
Is that sinking in yet?
From the Wikipedia AAP page:
“In April 2010, the academy revised its policy statement on female genital cutting, with one part of the new policy proving controversial. Although condemning female genital cutting overall, this statement suggested that current federal law banning the practice had the unintended consequence of driving families to perform the procedures in other countries, where these girls faced increased risk. As a possible compromise, this policy statement suggested that physicians have the option to perform a ceremonial “nick” on girls as a last resort to prevent them from being sent overseas for full circumcision. This particular position proved controversial to advocates for a full ban on female genital cutting under any circumstances[20] and concern from other medical groups[21] that even a “nick” would be condoning this widely rejected procedure. One month later, the academy retracted this policy statement.[22][23]“
But, that wasn’t the end of it. It is still being promoted by liberal Democrats…
Just so we are all on the same page here let’s review what FGM actually is. From the Wikipedia FGM article we get:
Female genital mutilation (FGM), also known as female genital cutting and female circumcision, is the ritual removal of some or all of the external female genitalia. The practice is found in Africa, Asia and the Middle East, and within communities from countries in which FGM is common. UNICEF estimated in 2016 that 200 million women alive today in 30 countries (27 African countries, Indonesia, Iraqi Kurdistan and Yemen) had undergone the procedures.[3]
Typically carried out by a traditional circumciser using a blade, FGM is conducted from days after birth to puberty and beyond. In half the countries for which national figures are available, most girls are cut before the age of five.[5] Procedures differ according to the country or ethnic group. They include removal of the clitoral hood and clitoral glans; removal of the inner labia; and removal of the inner and outer labia and closure of the vulva. In this last procedure (known as infibulation), a small hole is left for the passage of urine and menstrual fluid; the vagina is opened for intercourse and opened further for childbirth.[6]
The practice is rooted in gender inequality, attempts to control women’s sexuality, and ideas about purity, modesty and beauty. It is usually initiated and carried out by women, who see it as a source of honour, and who fear that failing to have their daughters and granddaughters cut will expose the girls to social exclusion.[a] The health effects depend on the procedure; they can include recurrent infections, difficulty urinating and passing menstrual flow, chronic pain, the development of cysts, an inability to get pregnant, complications during childbirth, and fatal bleeding.[6] There are no known health benefits.[9]
The AAP, of course, saw this as a HUGE profit center for their membership…
Then too, it would fit the needs of the Agenda 21 globalists and their intent to reduce Earth’s population from nine (9) billion to five hundred (500) million by the year 2021 (now moved to 2030).
But, there was backlash… and the AAP changed their (public) position – OR DID THEY?
The idea hasn’t gone away.
Six years later TWO well-known ultra-liberal publications – Newsweek and CNN promoted the idea – just a few months before the Presidential elections
On February 2, 2016, just a year ago, Newsweek Magazine posted an article titled “U.S. STUDY PROPOSES NICKING GENITALS AS ‘COMPROMISE’ FOR FGM IN WESTERN COUNTRIES…”. In that article Newsweek bleats:
“A controversial new study published in the Journal of Medical Ethics says “nicking” the genitals of young girls is an acceptable compromise for the practice of female genital mutilation (FGM) in the West.
Arguing that criminalizing FGM in Western countries such as the U.S. and U.K. has pushed the practice underground, the authors suggest a “compromise solution” that would legally permit a minimal form of genital mutilation “in recognition of its cultural and religious obligations.” Despite being perceived as a practice linked to Islam, FGM is a cultural practice that has no basis in religion. No religious texts prescribe FGM, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), while Human Rights Watch says the practice is “erroneously linked” to religion and “is not particular to any religious faith.”
In the study, published on Monday, U.S.-based authors Dr. Kavita Shah Arora, director of quality, obstetrics and gynecology at the MetroHealth Medical Center in Cleveland and Dr. Allan Jacobs, professor of reproductive medicine at Stony Brook University, write that “in order to better protect female children from the serious and long-term harms of some types of non-therapeutic [FGM], we must adopt a more nuanced position that acknowledges a wide spectrum of procedures that alter female genitalia.”
Ultra-liberal Trump hating CNN went much further in it’s promotion of removing an American girl’s clitoris with their production of a TV segment depicting how horrible the procedure was in Africa, promoting the idea of legalizing a “nick” here in the US.
I suspect that if Hillary Clinton had been elected this procedure would be REQUIRED by now.
Here is a segment CNN’s video titled “Doctors urge ‘compromise’ on female genital mutilation” from February 23, 2016:
How do they do it?
Here is their answer:
“We sit down the girl. Someone blindfolds her and lays her down on the ground. Then we cut. We cut three times. Then you take the ethanol spirit like this, and you pour it on the wound. it is a bit painful but it stops bleeding. We blindfold them and put hands over their mouths. They don’t even scream, because if they do … they can’t make noise because of what other girls might think of them.”
What is CNN promoting here? The fact that this procedure can be done in this country much cleaner and neater – and save the parents the air fare? They just want the law changed to allow it.
If you want to watch the whole two minute video you have to click here, and see it on CNN’s site.
So, why were the liberals trying to make this happen in the US?
I am about to show you.
You are not going to like the twenty minute video I am sending you to watch on FaceBook. It is called: “Then they were refugees.”
The video is about what is REALLY happening in the European Union with the refugee situation.
Click on the video box to watch it. The liberal media in Europe is just as globalist as it is here.
In short, the liberal Democrat Globalists, under the banner of Hillary Clinton, wanted “Open Borders” duplicating in America what is happening in the EU.
They wanted our little girls to be prepared for the multi-cultural (muslim) requirements of those so-called “refugees.” And, those “refugees” come from a culture, and religion, that requires women to be “cut” so they do not enjoy sex.
I didn’t see this issue being brought up in the so-called “Women’s March on Washington” organized by “Muslim feminist” Linda Sarsour did you? Why not?
Is this kind of thing OK with liberal Democrat women?
Looks like it.
Thank God we elected Donald Trump…
Stay tuned…
Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen
This is very dangerous and horrifying precedence. Refugees are coming into this country with no intent to adopt American traditions and customs. They are coming in to completely transform America. Shariah is being normalized. Everyone should heed Tim Bolen’s article as a warning.
-Karri Lewis
The Arabic name for the procedure of disabling female genital mutilation is bazr. It is an ancient (older than Islam) practice for subjecting women to male domination. One of the more common procedures requested by Muslim women when they come to the West is to try to reverse its effects. That is one of the things that has brought it to the attention of the Western media.
Now if it were just a harmless “nick” it wouldn’t be so bad, but that would also be medical malpractice to deceptively pander to the ignorance of patients or their parents, by pretending they were getting something they aren’t.
The involvement of political “liberals” comes from the ridiculous position of cultural relativism, that all belief systems are equally valid if held by enough people. Some beliefs are just ignorant and need to be denounced as such, regardless of who might be offended by that. (One doesn’t get that position from those trying to shout down views they don’t agree with.)
In my new novel, Wayward World, my hero deals firmly with the practice.
Take a chill pill, dude. I suspect that among the membership and leadership of the wealthy physicians in AAP you would find a significant number, probably majority of Republicans – even conservative Republicans. And do you have documentation that it is AAP official policy to have the doctors ask the children in private about gun ownership? Its certainly not stated on their website. I wouldnt doubt that some physcians have done it, but “a friend has told you” doesnt count as proof. Stick to the facts. Your frothing doesnt help the cause.
I take back that somewhat. I did find on their site “Address firearms safety as part of your routine anticipatory guidance with children of all ages. Ask about the presence of firearms in the home, and counsel parents who do keep guns to store them unloaded in a locked case, with the ammunition locked separately. While the safest home for children is one without a gun, safe storage practices can significantly reduce the risk of gun injury or death.” But it doesnt say to take the children aside and ask them privately. So half-right.
Roger – Wrong.
Guns do not belong, unloaded, in a locked case. That’s not what guns are for. Guns are to kill with.
Most States allow “Open-Carry” of firearms. Of course guns are loaded, and the carrier is ready, at a moment’s notice, to put two rounds in the chest, and one in the head of some nut-bag who wants to shoot up a shopping center…
Years ago, when I was a Deputy Sheriff, the handgun of choice was the Smith and Wesson Combat Masterpiece 38 six round wheel gun. We were taught to put just two in the chest – a double tap.
But, these days with the advent, and popularity of the 9 mm automatics, etc., the drill is two in the chest, one in the head. Why? Because bad guys can buy bullet proof vests. The nine can knock them down, but won’t pierce the vest, so you walk up and put one in their eyeball.
I prefer the .45. Only the best vests will stop them, and they make a much bigger hole coming out the back.
Gun people TEACH children about guns – and how dangerous they are by simply taking them to the gun range and firing the gun with them standing right there. I learned to shoot with a Montgomery Ward .22 pump-action rifle when I was seven – including how to clean it, oil it, load it, and hit the target. I got my own .22 when I was twelve, a 16 gauge shotgun when I was fourteen. I hunted game with my friends. Boys, and girls, in my High School got the first day of hunting season off if they could show their annual Hunting License.
When I went in the Navy I shot EXPERT on my first try with the Colt Model 1917 .45. I still love that gun.
These days I like the Colt .45 wheel gun – the gun that won the west. It has a much bigger bullet, a longer reach, and more gunpowder behind it, so it will pierce a vehicle somebody is hiding behind. I do NOT like magnums – too noisy, too much muzzle blast for night shooting.
Guns are for killing – not for storing away unloaded. They are not a toy or a cocktail party conversation piece.
They are NOT under the purview of pediatricians… What they are doing by asking is a plain invasion of privacy.
Tim Bolen
Tim,
It looks as if Roger was quoting a statement he found on the AAP website, not stating his personal opinion about how guns should be stored…but good point about the purpose of guns. My answer to the AAP on their position is, if you have a gun, it should be ready to use, otherwise what’s the point? If some armed nut job breaks into your house in the middle of the night are you going to fumble around trying to unlock your gun box in one place and get your ammo from another before you are attacked? Ridiculous. Either take the responsibility to teach everyone in the house about gun safety or don’t own one. Individual liberty and rights means individual responsibility, we can’t micromanage the behavior of every human being or legislate ourselves into Utopia. I don’t have a problem with a Pediatrician bringing up the issue of gun safety in general terms, similar to how they discuss common sense measures for child proofing the house, but they certainly need to keep their nose out of my business when it comes to exercising my 2nd Amendment rights.
Here is a link to the AAP’s guide to safety counseling for future reference:
https://patiented.solutions.aap.org/DocumentLibrary/A%20Guide%20to%20Safety%20Counseling%20in%20Office%20Practice.pdf
FYI – the video link in this post is inaccessible.
As for the AAP’s dabbling in “pretend” genital mutilation as a misguided effort to save young girls from being shipped overseas – that’s one of those unfortunate side effects of liberty. People have the right to entertain all kinds of ideas. And other people have the right to tell them to grow a set, take a f*cking stand, report parents who engage in the practice as you would any other form of child abuse, and quit pandering to barbarism because “culture”. Cannibalism is still practiced in some remote tribes, are we going to invite them to our country and protect their “religious freedom” to eat people?
That is so interesting that you covered the subject of FGM at this time; it has been on my mind a lot lately with the hypocrisy, and ignorance of many Americans at this time. You cannot support a culture that promotes abuse, torture and mutilation of girls and then claim that you are for womens’ rights. You can’t have it both ways. I wish I could say that it is mind-blowing that the Pharma-owned AAP would promote the normalization of mutilating American girls and to give the procedure a euphemistic title of a “Nick”. But, since they knowingly promote vaccines in which they know cause cancer, brain damage and auto-immune diseases, this is just par for the course.
Many Muslim people are very lovely kind people and I hate to see them stereotyped. I agree with you that FGM is a horrific practice and that some Muslims are following bad cultural practices. There is a cultural melting pot of different types of Muslim people same as here. Heck we have those Westboro Baptist loonies here – you wouldn’t want people to use them as an example of Christian people either. Black and white thinking divides us and gets us into messes like with the vaccine issue. There is so much nuance and gray area when you really look at a situation like this and it can’t get better without the wisdom that comes from seeing that.