It is now some years since the “Global Warming” scare originated with a railway engineer…
…(since arrested and charged with the sexual abuse of a young boy in India), and his paymasters at the United Nations.
From Europe By Karma Singh
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change also known as the IPCC – (please note “intergovernmental” not international) – was created as a political lobby to sell the concept of man-made global warming to the world at large. Whilst it pretended to have a large body of top-notch climate scientists behind it, many of these “2500 world class scientists” were, in fact, students, journalists, commentators, bureaucrats and others.
Just below is the entire one hour sixteen minute “The Great Global Warning Swindle” produced by HONEST scientists…
The “climate change concept which they were trying to sell…
..is based upon a suggestion from a Swedish scientist in the 1960’s when the changes in the world temperature led many to fear that we were heading for a new Ice Age. His suggestion was that if we could burn a lot more coal and oil then we just might be able to produce so much CO2 that we could create a sort of “greenhouse effect” and stave off the global cooling. It must be noted that this was a time in which the rapid expansion in the production and use of consumer goods (including cars) had already given rise to an increase in CO2 produced by we humans but this was nowhere near the levels needed for his proposed greenhouse effect. Human activity currently produces about six per cent of all CO2. To get the effect he proposed, we would have to increase this to more than 30%, i.e. more than FIVE TIMES the present level. Fortunately, just as human produced CO2 actually fell off due to the oil crisis in 1973/74, sun spot activity, which had almost stopped in the early 1950’s, resumed and temperatures began to rise again.
Subsequently the NASA released, in the year 2000…
…data which it had collected in 1958 proving the Milankovitch theory of climate changes. Both of these demonstrate that 100% of climate variations throughout Earth’s history have been due to a slight eccentricity in Earth’s orbit around the sun, i.e. sometimes we’re closer and it’s warmer and sometimes we’re further away and it’s cooler.
Further satellite data from NASA shows that, between 1982 and 2015, there has been a dramatic increase in plant growth (and, therefore, food-crop production) as plants have made use of the slight increase in the availability of that, to them, essential nutrient CO2 plus additional warmth to expand growth by an average of 25% across the globe, i.e. they have not left any CO2 over to produce any global warming but have given us extra food instead.
This is why, historically, warmer periods have always been a time of great prosperity, relative peace and intellectual and artistic flourishing. The last warm period, the Medieval Warm Period from about 830 to 1300 AD saw the construction of most of our great monumental buildings, the establishment of stable countries, an expansion of learning, the Pilgrimage custom and more but also the Crusades and the Papal Empire, Genghis Khan, etc.. The much longer and much warmer period before that saw the birth of civilisation and agriculture as we know them and when it ended with a new cold period, it brought about the collapse of the Roman Empire.
The cold period, called the Little Ice Age, from about 1300 to 1850, that we’re just climbing out of engendered a series of European wars and, later, forced the Europeans to plunder the orient in search of the plenty which the cold denied them at home.
In short; warm times = good times and cold times = bad times.
Actually, as the true temperature increase from 1870 to 2005 (since when it has remained unchanged) is only 0.8°C, we are still, technically, in the Little Ice Age – we don’t really have a warm period as yet. It’s warm enough to partially melt some of the Little Ice Age glaciers (Mendenhall, for example) which occupy land which was forest 700 years ago but not yet warm enough to enable European farmers to double crop as they did in the Medieval Warm Period. The coastal plains of Greenland do not yet sport the lush forests which had enabled the Vikings to maintain a city there. Polar bear populations have increased from 1980 to 2017 by an average of 25% lending credence to the stories of the Vikings hunting them for their pelts and oil. It stands to reason, of course, that when food is available in greater abundance, the numbers of the top predators will also increase.
The “crowning glory” to the “Climate Change Hoax” is the new Winter weather forecast from the British Metrological Office.
Their prognosis is the coldest Winter for 30 years, with temperatures as low as minus 14°C (-57°F). This is the logical consequence of the great expansion of the Polar Ice Sheet which has taken place this year which may well result in Arctic winds being able to reach well into the temperate zones. Perhaps the most interesting thing is that they base this prognosis exclusively upon reduced sun spot activity revealing that even the government weather office doesn’t believe the CO2 fairy tale either!
In my next article, I will detail who is running the hoax and why, i.e. what are their objectives?