“Amazingly little” is the answer and most of what we thought we knew has turned out to be erroneous.
From Europe by Karma Singh
“Science” can’t even prove that viruses, themselves, legally exist!
This is the core of the ruling in Germany’s highest court in December 2016:
“The available evidence (i.e. that from electron microscopes) does not even prove that viruses exist let alone that they are harmful. The panel of judges ruled that the supposition, guesswork and presumptions which were offered to them do not constitute evidence proving the existence of viruses and ruled against the appellant.”
So what, you might ask, are those things that they keep showing us photos of?
The answer is, scientifically, “We simply don’t know!”
When we look at the world around us, we see that things appear to grow and then to die. Although the ancient Vedic, Chinese and Sumerian cultures understood how and why, this knowledge appears to have been lost to the Celts who, following the calamity of 3950 B.C., moved West to begin their occupation of what is now called Europe. It is certain that they did bring some of the ancient knowledge with them but this appears to have been lost in the wars of extermination carried out by the Romans.
This state of ignorance was exploited by the Catholic Church to build for themselves an empire which lasted more than 1000 years. The basis of their power was “fear of the unknown” which they took great care to preserve by denying access to learning for other than their “chosen elite”. They even made it a capital crime to translate the Bible into a language which the people spoke!
These two driving impulses: The Roman extermination of spiritual knowledge and the Catholic preservation of ignorance made the “Christian” world a very fearful place.
For centuries, the Western World cried out for an explanation of how and why people, animals and crops got sick and died. Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch made use of this thirst for knowledge to spread their doctrine of “infectious disease” even though both knew (as Pasteur freely admitted in his memoirs) that it was and is a bare-faced lie. The personal aggrandisement and large amounts of money which they gained were their driving force.
The “sleight of hand” which they, together, used was done with the recently improved microscope technology. They were able to inculcate a general belief in “disease germs” by showing that certain species of bacteria were present in animals with specific illnesses.
The other pertinent facts they just “forgot” to mention. These facts include:-
i) These bacteria were not always present in the sick animal.
ii) The bacteria were found in animals which were not and did not become ill.
iii) No causational, merely a coincidental connection between bacterium and illness could be shown.
iv) When the illness was over, the bacteria did not disappear but “merely” became dormant.
Their “teaching” that bacteria are parasitic and that health is to be regained by killing them found widespread acceptance in the public at large but not so much in the scientific community of the time because Koch and Pasteur’s publications and hypotheses were so vague and inconclusive.
Others pointed to polluted water, poor food and lack of sanitation as more likely causes of illness. These have been proved time and time again to be correct and improvements in these areas have not only eliminated many diseases but also, over the last 150 years, literally doubled life-expectancy. Nonetheless, because there was so much money to be made out of killing bacteria rather than everyone benefiting from improved drinking water, sanitation and food, the new owners of the pharmaceutical industry, Rockefeller, Carnegie and others, pushed the flawed Koch/Pasteur hypothesis with all their might.
Thus was born the guiding principle of modern Western medicine: “Profit at the expense of health.”
When, in the closing years of the 19th century, certain Russian, Dutch and French botanists experienced diseased plants but could find no related bacteria, they postulated that there “must be” much, much smaller “parasites” – too small to be seen with their microscopes. These were, then, called “virus”; the Latin name for poison.
It was only in 1937 that the first electron microscope was built. Such a device, which can magnify more than 3,500 times, is capable of seeing something as small as a putative virus. The big drawbacks are that it can only view dead, immobile material and only give black and white pictures. This renders it totally useless as a tool for medical research.
You see, if you wish to claim that certain micro-organisms are CAUSING problems then you must be able to show evidence that that is what they do, otherwise it’s just pure guesswork. That certain micro-proteins are present is NOT evidence that they are causing problems; they could equally be a part of the solution. Until you can see where they come from, what they do, what they are for and where they go to there is no way that you can determine whether they are harmful, useful or irrelevant.
An electron microscope simply doesn’t let you do this!
This is the core of the ruling in Germany’s highest court in December 2016: The available evidence (i.e. that from electron microscopes) does not even prove that viruses exist let alone that they are harmful. The panel of judges ruled that the supposition, guesswork and presumptions which were offered to them do not constitute evidence proving the existence of viruses and ruled against the appellant.
A further breakthrough in microscopy was needed before clarity could be established. This occurred in the early 1980’s in Quebec, Canada when Gaston Naessens unveiled his “Somatoscope”. His invention which can view living, moving organisms at more than 20,000 times magnification finally made it possible to verify the virus hypothesis.
The Somatoscope shows clearly and incontrovertibly that viruses do NOT exist and the “disease caused by viruses hypothesis” is fatally flawed, i.e., in normal speech, total nonsense.
The things which have been called “viruses”, it turns out, are actually an essential part of natural cell repair and replacement processes, i.e. your own body makes them as it needs them in order to clear out damaged cells and their residues. This, of course, also answers the puzzling fact that every so-called virus is genetically unique to the person, animal or plant from which it was removed. It also explains why “viruses” are not contagious; the genetic pattern doesn’t fit and so your own natural immunity will instantly identify any such particles as foreign and destroy it. The only way to prevent this happening is to bypass the first two “lines of defence” by injecting the foreign particles directly into your blood stream in combination with immune suppressants to prevent your natural immunity reacting to neutralise the “invader”.
This “cocktail” manufactured by the pharmaceutical industry shows very clearly that they are aware that “infection” in the manner in which we taught in school and is a dogma, i.e. a “required” belief in order to get a licence to practise medicine, does not happen. It is only by actively disabling our natural immunity that they are able to make us ill at all with their vaccines.
Presently, we see this in the Philippines where a Bill Gates sponsored mass-vaccination programme (paid for by American taxpayers) is crippling thousands of previously healthy children in a land which, previously, did not have a polio problem. In India, Gates has injured and killed so many that he has been expelled from the country and his vaccination programme closed down.
We Europeans, Americans and Australasians are, apparently, to be the next victims unless we decide to stop it.
To read more on this, get yourself a copy of “Tyrannosaurus Pharmaceuticus R.I.P.” available exclusively from https://www.tprip.com
N.B. At present, postal services are refusing to accept packages for delivery outside Europe. Printed books can, therefore, not be sent to N. America or Australasia. The E-book editions of all books continue to be available.