Federal Court Lawsuit to be Filed Against SB 277 Tomorrow Morning…

By Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen  

I have here, on my desk, a DRAFT copy of the lawsuit to be filed tomorrow, Friday, July 1st, 2016 against SB277 in California.  I can’t show you a copy of the final version until the exact moment it is filed.  I am sworn to secrecy.

This is the lawsuit I wrote about earlier.

But, There ARE some things I can tell you right now:

Diane Miller JD and Barbara Loe Fisher at the Health Freedom Congress

(1) My friend Diane Miller JD, sometime Author for the BolenReport, and the head of the Health Freedom Congress, is flying in from Minnesota tomorrow to attend, and speak at, the Santa Monica Rally organized by Wendy Silvers. She  will speak on the details of the lawsuit.  Go there to hear what she has to say.

(2) I can tell you the names of the attorneys involved and tell you what I know about them. You will be pleased.

(3)  I can tell you the basic outline of the case – what the points are, and why the attorneys are going in THOSE SPECIFIC directions. Once again, you will be pleased.

(4)  I can tell you WHY there was so much secrecy in the organization of the case – and why I agreed with that tactic.

(5)  I can tell you where I think this is going.

Let’s begin…

The Attorneys:  There are three named on the face page of the First Day copy of the lawsuit:  Jim Turner, Betsy Lehrfeld,  and Carl Lewis.  Why these three?  Yes, there are a lot more attorneys involved.  There is a tactic, and strategy at play here.  For instance Bob Moxley, of Wyoming, is playing a major role, but his name is not on the first day filing for the simple reason that the case needs his personal signatures – and he is not immediately available.

In the background are many more attorneys.  There is an advisory team beyond that.

First Day Attorneys…

James S. Turner(1) Jim Turner – I have known, and worked with, Jim for about 30 years.

James S. Turner is a partner in the Washington, DC law firm of Swankin and Turner, formed in 1973. He is also Board Chair of Citizens for Health, the consumer voice of the natural health community; President of the National Institute for Science, Law & Public Policy; and President of Voice for HOPE (Healers Of Planet Earth).

In 1968, Mr. Turner came to Washington, DC to work with Ralph Nader. He wrote The Chemical Feast: The Nader Report on Food Protection at the FDA (Grossman, 1970), and co-authored Making Your Own Baby Food (Workman, 1974) and Voice of the People: The Transpartisan Imperative in American Life (DaVinci Press, 2008).

Tim Bolen and Jim Turner at the Health Freedom Congress

As an attorney, Mr. Turner represents consumer, environmental and public interest groups, as well as businesses and individuals, on a wide variety of regulatory and other legal matters concerning foods, drugs, health, the environment, and product safety. He has served as Special Counsel to the Senate Select Committee on Food, Nutrition, and Health, and to the Senate Government Operations Subcommittee on Government Research. He has also been a policy consultant to major corporations in the food, pharmaceutical, and telecommunications industries, including Kraft Foods, The Quaker Oats Company, Hoffmann-LaRoche, and AT&T.

Mr. Turner represented a consumer coalition that successfully opposed a Federal Trade Commission effort to ban the words “organic,” “natural,” and “health food” from commerce, and was lead attorney on a successful petition to the FDA to reclassify acupuncture needles from Class III to Class II medical devices, thereby permitting their legal importation and distribution.

He is a 1969 graduate of The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law and served as a gunnery officer in the United States Navy.

Betsy(2) Betsy Lehrfeld – Betsy E. Lehrfeld, a principal in the Washington, DC law firm Swankin & Turner, focuses on health care, health-specialty certification, and contract, corporate and tax matters for businesses and nonprofit organizations. She has appeared before the Food and Drug Administration and has served as general counsel to numerous nonprofits.

A graduate of the University of California at Berkeley School of Law (Boalt Hall), she currently serves as executive director of the National Institute for Science, Law, and Public Policy, and as a board member of Voice for HOPE (Healers of Planet Earth).


(3) Carl Lewis –  Dedication to the protection of individual rights and those of small business owners has been the focus of the firm’s practice since 1985. Mr. Lewis excels in tenacious representation of clients at all stages of the litigation process including trial courts, appellate courts and the Supreme Courts of California and the United States in matters involving a variety of claims.

Admitted to Practice in the Following Courts:

United States Supreme Court, First Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, United States District Court, Southern District of California, United States District Court, Central District of California, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, State of California, All Courts.

Based in San Diego, California, Mr. Lewis practices in the areas of civil litigation and appeals and has represented clients before a number of California appellate courts, the Supreme Court of California, the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Ninth and Eleventh Circuits and the Supreme Court of the United States,.  His practice includes representation of individuals in the areas of employment, discrimination and  civil rights.

Right there behind them…

bobmoxley(1) Bob Moxley – I’ve not met Bob, personally, yet. I’ve just talked to him about litigation strategies for this case.  California activists will remember Bob testifying at the Sacramento SB 277 legislative hearings.

Robert T. Moxley was born in Cheyenne, Wyoming and raised in Chugwater, Wyoming, the second son of a wheat farmer. Mr. Moxley attended Chugwater schools for 11 years, and graduated in 1971 from Wheatland High School, in Wheatland, Wyoming..

Bob attended the University of Wyoming and the University of Oklahoma, and graduated from OU in 1975 with a B.A. in History. He attended the Oklahoma University College of Law from 1976 to 1978, and in 1977 attended the OU College of Law summer program in Oxford, England. He obtained his J.D. in December of 1978, passed the State of Wyoming winter bar exam in 1979, and hung out his shingle in Wheatland, Wyoming, in April of 1979.

A sole practitioner for nine years at the start of his career, Bob moved to Cheyenne in 1988, and associated with Whitehead, Gage, and Davidson. In 1990 he became a principal in Gage & Moxley, with an emphasis in vaccine compensation law. The firm of Gage & Moxley dissolved in 2006, and Mr. Moxley has been a sole practitioner in the firm of Robert T. Moxley, P.C., since that time.

Bob is a member of the Wyoming Trial Lawyers Association (WTLA) and the American Association for Justice (AAJ). He is also a longstanding member of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and has pursued religious freedom litigation in association with The Rutherford Institute. Mr. Moxley has represented successful plaintiffs in medical malpractice litigation featuring brain injury, and is experienced in personal injury litigation arising from auto accidents.

He has been active since 1979 in the practice of criminal defense, and is a member of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL). He was appointed in 1982 by Wyoming Governor Ed Herschler and served for several years as an Assistant Public Defender for Platte and Goshen Counties; during his tenure he represented an innocent man charged with murder, in the matter of State of Wyoming v. Martin Frias. Mr. Frias, initially convicted, was acquitted on re-trial in 1986, after Moxley developed forensic evidence to prove that the alleged victim committed suicide. The Frias case was featured on The West, a syndicated television magazine with John Gibson on KCRA, Channel 3 in Sacramento, California, and Bob also appeared with Mike Wallace on 60 Minutes in a lead segment featuring the case. The Frias case has also been the subject of episodes of The New Detectives on The Discovery Channel, and in Forensic Files on Court TV.

Mr. Moxley has practiced in the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensation Program since its inception in 1988, in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims in Washington, D.C.  Mr. Moxley has been personally involved in over one hundred vaccine injury cases, including omnibus proceedings where he was lead counsel.  His extensive vaccine practice has led to a Civil Rights practice as well, representing parents and families in the vindication of the right to religious and conscientious objection to mandatory vaccination.

Mr. Moxley obtained reversal in the Federal Circuit of the denial of compensation to a vaccine injured child in the case that went to the United States Supreme Court as Shalala v. Whitecotton. It was the first and only Vaccine Act case to be argued before the United States Supreme Court, until Sebelius v. Cloer, currently on review in the U.S. Supreme Court. Mr. Moxley is co-counsel for the vaccine injured petitioner in the Cloer case, and guided the attorneys fees litigation that the Supreme Court agreed to review on the government’s petition.

Mr. Moxley is admitted to practice before the Wyoming Federal and State bars, several Federal District and Circuit Courts of Appeal, the United States Court of Federal Claims, and the U.S. Supreme Court. He has practiced pro hac vice in the state courts of Colorado, Nebraska, and Ohio. Mr. Moxley is a widower, and lives in the country with his Border Collies. Mr. Moxley is an “A” rated pool player and twenty-five year member of the Cheyenne Valley Pool League. He is a long-time member of the Cheyenne Airport Golf Club.

(2) Many, many more working on this case, in the background.  I’ll show them to you as they appear.

The Case Outline…

Remember that I am looking at the attorney’s Draft Copy which has notes all over it.  It is NOT the final copy to be file with the Court Friday, July 1st, 2016 – but close.

(1) There are FOUR Plaintiffs.  One non-profit organization, and three individuals.

(2)  There are TEN Defendant groups – which include the State of California Department of Health, Department of Education, three Schools Districts, and one County Public Health Department (Santa Barbara), and their employees, some named individually, and others in a group.

(3)  There are, in the Draft Copy I have, THREE Counts (Causes of Action) – Violation of Constitutional Rights, Violation of California Constitution, and Violations of Federal and State Laws That prohibit Certain Uses of Medical Information.

(4)  There are FOURTEEN sub-categories listed under the Violation of Constitutional Rights Count.

(5) There are EIGHT sub-categories listed under the Violation of California Constitution Count.

(6) There are FIVE sub-categories listed under the Violations of Federal and State Laws That prohibit Certain Uses of Medical Information Count.

(7)  The Relief Requested has FOUR parts – a request to declare SB 277 unconstitutional, a request for injunction preventing activation of SB 277, an award of attorney fees, and other relief as the Court sees fit.

Some things you will find interesting…

(1) The arguments (sub-categories) in the Counts follow common-sense guidelines, as in:

(a)The individual Plaintiff’s children have a liberty interest in bodily integrity, and the right to be free of unconsented-to and potentially dangerous medical interventions.

(b) The individual plaintiffs, and each of them, have a liberty interest under the constitution in making the medical treatment choices for their minor children, in regulating their upbringing, in directing their education, and in exercising informed consent to medical treatment on behalf of their minor children. The individual Plaintiffs have health-related concerns regarding vaccination, including the practice of administering multiple vaccinations at once, and have acted to exempt or partially exempt their children from certain vaccines and schedules, out of concern with the known propensity of vaccinations to cause serious injuries.  Plaintiffs’ medical concerns also include the fact that certain vaccine ingredients and contaminating substances present in vaccines are harmful, particularly to some children; these ingredients include aluminum, animal proteins, egg protein, formaldehyde, mercury and genetic fragments.

(c)  The individual Plaintiffs have a property right in the entitlement of their children to a free public education, which right entails attending public schools, and in the alternative provides the option of purchasing education services on the open market from private sources.

(d)  The individual plaintiffs, and each of them, possess a right guaranteed by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution to freely practice religion, free from intrusion by officials from the State of California, free from the application of regulatory laws or other official conduct that imposes a burden upon Free Exercise, and free from the threat of loss of public benefits, by virtue of such exercise of religion.

(d)  For example, the California “mandatory” vaccination scheme conflicts in several ways with sincerely held religious belief; particularly, important vaccines including the MMR (measles mumps rubella) are manufactured from cell lines intentionally derived from aborted fetus tissue.

(e)  Religious concerns for bodily integrity and purity render repugnant the injection of many of the substances in certain vaccines into the human body, contrary to sincerely held religious beliefs and practices.; prayer, and the desire for a godly lifestyle, lead many to their conscientious decisions to limit vaccination. Some individual Plaintiffs have religious concerns regarding vaccines, include the fact that certain mandatory vaccines, including the mandatory MMR, are manufactured using embryonic diploid cell lines (e.g., WI-38 and MRC-5) obtained from the abortion of a human fetus.

(f)  The plaintiffs who seek exemption for reasons that do not spring from religious belief likewise have many concerns about the ingredients and circumstances of vaccinations as well; all of these concerns, religious and secular, have to do with the safety and wellbeing of the plaintiffs’ children.

(g)  Certain of the named plaintiffs and/or persons represented by organizational plaintiff[s] are single working parents, or parents in two-income households, and the Amendment’s effect of forcing children to be home-schooled will interfere with the parents’ employment.

(h)  Certain of the named plaintiffs and/or persons represented by organizational plaintiff[s] are not fluent in the English language, which disqualifies them from homeschooling their children under California statute.

(i)  Certain of the named plaintiffs and/or persons represented by organizational plaintiff[s] are lacking sufficient education in order to be capable of homeschooling their children, as will be required when children are excluded from school for not being “fully” vaccinated.

(j) Under California law parents who are unable to homeschool their children, for lack of financial or other necessary wherewithal, will risk the loss of custody of their children for “neglect,” under the California Welfare and Institutions Code § 300.

(k)  The Amendment and its ensuing regulatory scheme discriminates against poor families, who are without the ability to pay for screening of their children, and therefore less able to obtain medical exemptions on the basis of family history and other known medical concerns.

There is a Lot More…

Why was there so much secrecy?  Court cases take a LOT of work to set up.  There is no cookie-cutter approach.  Every detail has to be thought through.  This case has been months in the making.

Where is this going?  I think the fun is JUST starting.


By Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen



46 thoughts on “Federal Court Lawsuit to be Filed Against SB 277 Tomorrow Morning…”

  1. https://www.cdc.gov/budget/documents/fy2017/fy-2017-cdc-budget-overview.pdf

    The fiscal year (FY) 2017 President’s Budget request for CDC and ATSDR

    Page 3

    Vaccines for Children – Mandatory Funding (+$225.9 million)
    The FY 2017 budget request includes an increase of $225.9 million in mandatory funding for the Vaccines for Children (VFC) Program. This estimate includes an increase for vaccine purchase contract costs and additional quality assurance and quality improvement site visits to VFC-enrolled providers. Taken together with CDC’s discretionary immunization activities, these programs provide vaccines and the necessary program support to reach uninsured and underinsured populations. These resources will help support a comprehensive immunization program, based on strong science—from establishing and implementing vaccine policy to monitoring the effectiveness, impact, coverage, and safety of routinely recommended vaccines.

    Page 9

    Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (-$5.4 million)
    The FY 2017 budget request reflects the elimination for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS). The goal of CDC’s current CFS program is to develop tools to gather and analyze surveillance data and to educate clinicians and the population based on the results of evidence-based studies. Over the past five years, NIH has been funded at a similar level to conduct biomedical research on CFS. CFS affects between one and four million people in the US, and this funding could be used to have a greater programmatic impact across CDC.

  2. Good Luck with that!
    The entities that have exacted this medical and civil tyranny are not afraid of lawsuits. They are sinister soulless hybrids with no conscious or empathy. They have bought(use this term liberally as in blood sacrifice or exchange) the authorities, the media and the court system ALL THE WAY UP. I feel like I am raining on OUR parade but the first step in knowing what’s going on is to become AWAKE. Becoming AWARE that the enemy is using the powers that be as puppets albeit brainwashed and programmed. This is how we got into this “pHARMA is not liable” in the first place. If you do some digging it goes something like this: Drug dealers said, “we are not gonna manufacture vaccines no more cause the maimed and dead babies, children and adults are making claims and taking our profits”. So the lawyers, counselors, senators, council people, government representatives, governors, presidents and so on led the lovely aware elevated conscious sentient beings to believe that their solution would be SUPER DUPER! That solution being the vaccine court. Even the esteemed NVIC(who I love dearly) was there supporting the EVIL doers solution. The wool had been pulled over the eyes of the NVIC. In 1986, problem solved. Vaccine court along with drug dealer and manufacturers indemnity. No more worries. Be careful. Just sayin.

  3. I really don’t like the part about someone not being educated enough to homeschool. We really don’t want the state to start saying you have to have a certain level of education to be able to homeschool. especially when there are plenty of resources available.

    Still, I’m super excited about this!!

  4. Finally! Thanks for the update Tim. It is high time we defeat SB 277. Hard to belief they could possibly ignore the hundreds of people who lined up in opposition to SB 277 before stacking the vote in their favor. This corruption has to end…you can believe we will stay tuned!

  5. We [national and state level] need a healthcare freedom amendment that protects right to choose type of healthcare [beyond consumer access and right to practice]. It’s beyond just vaccine “biologics” mandates… forcing parents to choose chemo/radiation, other ‘preventative screenings’ adults are forced into, etc. Rights to your own body’s care are not religious, personal belief, philosophical, educational, etc; they are just rights. Period.
    Yes, we must pull together and stay focused re 277. Thank you.

  6. Tim Bolen. I thought It was illegal for anybody to receive kickbacks under the kickback law act. HARMACEUTICALS only work through bribing politicians. This law was introduced by a corrupted politican Senator Richard Pan. Doesn’t part of this law already make sb277 illegal.

  7. You are nothing less than my HEROS!
    Vous êtes rien de moins que mes HEROS!
    Jean, French Canadian

  8. “In the constitution of Massachusetts adopted in 1780, it was laid down as a fundamental principle of the social compact that the whole people covenants with each citizen, and each citizen with the whole people, that all shall be governed by certain laws for “the common good,” and that government is instituted for the common good, for the protection, safety, prosperity and happiness of the people, and not for the profit, honor or private interests of anyone man, family or class of men.”

    If physicians are being financially incentivized at $400 a patient by insurance promotions to fully vaccinate, aren’t private interests being served by mandates?
    Commonwealth v. Alger, 7 Cush. 53, 84.”

  9. Thank you Tim Bolen! You give me hope in these heartbreaking (maddening!) corrupt times. I will be following you and this case closely, please let us know how we can help you defeat the insane hubris and tyranny represented by the authors and bought off politicians in SB 277. It is so vile that our lawmakers would deny it’s constituents the basic human right of informed consent, especially the toxic hoax that is vaccine industry. The Nuremberg trials were only a generation ago yet our enlightened legislators find themselves siding with the Nazi’s. I can’t say it enough, thanks again for all the work you know how to do so well.

  10. Hi Tim (especially),
    in view of the direction chosen, the details in the article I sent you on 22nd June at 01.06 a.m. California time (10.06 a.m. my time) may well be essential.

    The discovery that vaccines are vastly more dangerous than hitherto supposed and other essential eye-openers could make a great difference.

    I will be publishing the article in my own newsletter next Tuesday, 5th July. The link to read it will be http://www.hecrl.com/vid in English and hecrl.com/iid in German.

    It’s a pity that the US is not a full signatory to the Convention on Human Rights as this case is ideal for an application in the Court of Human Rights in The Hague.

    Blessed be

    Karma Singh

  11. I am so happy and relieved to hear about this. We need someone to stand up for the concerned parents out their who don’t want to poison their children.

  12. If they can buy our Politicians and Dr.s then we can pay our Lawyers! Thank You for all you are doing!!! How can we support you?

  13. There are tens of thousands supporting you and this lawsuit, praying on behalf of their children for your success. I am one of them.

    May the road rise up to meet you, and the wind be at your back.

  14. Please pass along a thank you to all involved! We are anxiously watching from the state of Georgia.

  15. Thank you! Now we need to ensure the media covers this case!!! We don’t want this one going silent everyone should know what the court decides and doesn’t decide as it could be a Momentus point in history.

  16. a few ideas re sb277

    “(3) There are, in the Draft Copy I have, THREE Counts (Causes of Action) – Violation of Constitutional Rights, Violation of California Constitution, and Violations of Federal and State Laws That prohibit Certain Uses of Medical Information.”

    — why not mention or press charges for human rights violations based on “my body my choice,” informed consent, Nuremberg Code, etc.?

    — what about the concept of “medical rape?” the legislators are guilty of either attempted — or successful medical rape?

    — what about the statistical certainty of death and injury — once “vaccines” become mandatory? then, given the statistical certainty of death, it is easy to recognize compulsory vaccination as an occult ritual that sacrifices the few, for the perceived benefit of the “many.” does that make sense? if it is ritual sacrifice, then ppl are being legally forced to participate in an occult religious ceremony where death is a certain result. ok — the victims at least don’t know which genetic types are most prone to die — but death is a statistical certainty. so, the legislators are participating in assault, murder, and occult ritual sacrifice.

    …does that help?

    “adults make medical choices for themselves and their children” — there — that is a short “catch all” solution — does that help?

    — what about withholding public schooling as a method of coercion to force ppl into vaccinating — where there is a direct financial conflict of interest regarding legislators receiving financial profits from the vaccines — and vaccine legislation — isn’t that something like “racketeering” and “use of government resources for personal and business gain?”

    — also, what about vaccines simply not granting immunity? so, vaccines do not immunize. sb277 requires “immunized” children – does it not? well — which vaccines actually guarantee immunity? which vaccines immunize? do any vaccines immunize? will any vaccine manufacturer or politician guarantee the immunization of vaccine recipients? does that not make it impossible for any child — vaccinated or unvaccinated — to attend school — with sb277 in place?

    — isn’t it clear the vaccine mandates violate human rights?

    — what about the clear national security threat of mandatory vaccines? how hard would it be to contaminate vaccines in a way that only causes damage, let’s say, after a decade? how hard is it, scientifically, to spread disease via vaccines?

    …do let me know if you find my thoughts on the matter useful for your case.

    thank you for your consumer advocacy 🙂
    dainis w michel

  17. “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.” Margaret Mead

    THANK YOU! We must stand up to the forces of evil , and maintain our rights as citizens, parents, and freedom as intended by our Constitution. You and the greater team who are committed to use your talents on our behalf, are my hero’s. …it will not be easy, and you will be called to persevere through difficult times…but the truth shall overcome fear, and will prevail. Please tell us how we can support you. God Bless you.

  18. So can women chose to vaccinate with DTP which worked, or at least didn’t make their children near constant sympomless carriers of whooping cough, OR DO THE MOTHERS have to vaccinate with Dtap, known even FDA admitted that, in 2013 (google FDA baboons, too pick). so anyway, the mothers now HAVE TO JAB THEIR BABIES WITH DTAP, Despite the fact, it is now known, those children will catch, carry and spread whooping cough, over and over for the minimum of 12 years, till their vaccine fails, they catch the whooping cough in their own throats, get a nasty cough for 8 weeks, and never ever spread it again. Anyhow, these mothers are FORCED to vaccinate with Dtap, and it is KNOWN, these Dtap kids will continue to catch, carry and spread whooping cough, even to newborns, without these DTap kids having symptoms for up to 12 years……………………………….. So what do mothers do? isolate themselves from the siblings, who yes, are spreading whooping cough, no symptoms to newborns? or does mother get TDap in pregnancy, which has led to 5,000 vaccine damaged babies in Brazil, or 25,000 vaccine damaged babies in USA?

  19. Hi Mr Bolen,
    Thank you for filing your lawsuit against SB277. I’m in tears that there is someone finally doing this. If the following link isn’t from your office, do you have some where that we can support what you are doing?


    I am working in the Early Childhood field and will be impacted by the SB792 bill. Can you tell me if you know of any lawsuits being filed against that bill yet? I am desperate and would love to support you/them.

    Thank you for your time,

  20. Tim and your team; you are all heroes. I expect this case will inform more parents in the USA and globally about corruption between big pharma and the politicians.

  21. I am assuming that some of may have to go to jail and/or have our children taken from us before this is over. Can you make any recommendations for protecting ourselves legally before that happens? Should we get lawyers before hand if we plan to stand our ground and say NO! And can you refer us to lawyers that will take this on?
    Thank you

  22. Georgia.
    Go to jail for What?? If you don’t vaccinate your child isn’t going to school (in the state of California) period.
    You can homeschool in which there is no vaccine requirements
    so who said anything about Jail???????!!!!!!!!

  23. If Tim says “More fun to come” all I can say is yipeee! Good luck to you all!!! Bring’em home!

  24. THANK you, Tim, for this great news on this otherwise horrible day in California, when the ‘crammed down your throat, draconian vaccine mandate law – SB277 begins!’

    What a great lineup of legal warriors! I was hoping that Robert Moxley would be involved, after hearing him last year in Sacramento.

    Thank you for all your contributions over the years advocating for our cause. I always an eager to read your report, and this one gives me and multitudes of Californians, hope!!
    Fight on for freedom’s cause!

  25. Violation of Nuremberg code should have been filed. There cannot be informed consent without disclosure and every doctor is fraudulently inducing parent to consent to profit from vaccines. Every participating doctor or nurse violates mandatory disclosure law by not providing vaccine insert, which came together in the box with vaccine. Vaccines are defective product as a matter of case law clearly stated in 2011 SCOTUS ruling. Defective product cannot be forced on population irrespectful what arguments are used. I would also challenge 1986 deal with big pharma on basis that violates natural law. Our bodies belong to us not governments. Every person on Earth has a right to decide whether to participate or not participate in medical tratments or procedures. Children are responsibility of parents not government. Medical doctors are most corrupted and evil profession in America other than politicians.

  26. I thought the lawsuit was being filed today – July 1? Your earlier article indicated you weren’t going to support a Canary Party lawsuit………….Another Go Fund Me scam? And you’re supporting this?

  27. It WAS filed LATE. I am writing about it now. lot’s to explain, and links to make.

  28. I have 0 faith in the court/legal system in this country. All politicians can be/are bought. We witnessed it in the SB277 hearings in California. If this endeavor fails it will seal all kids’ fates. And this is just the beginning.

  29. Hi,

    I am a single California mother of 3 children who has never been vaccinated as my mom is an herbalist/healer natural healthcare practitioner for over 35yrs and I wouldn’t consider vaccinating my children either.

    We have been denied enrollment from schools (kindergarten and preschool) based on the fact that the doctors note prescription from (a Beverly Hills pediatric doctor who stated if I were to start vaccinating my 5yr old to be up to date it could “kill him”) was not sufficient to exempt my children from the requirements because the prescription note was “not good enough”.

    I’m currently enrolling my kindergartener in homeschool but am moving out of state even though i have no resources or community or friends or family where we are going , and my entire support system is in California.

    Please let me know if you’d need my statements or appearance in any way to help overturn the ridiculous vaccine law.

    Thank you to all the people involved in helping to overturn the law which would make me a “negligent” criminal for not complying with mandatory vaccines – which I lived free of my whole life – my 3 sisters and I are in perfect health without ever being vaccinated in over 30 years.

    Thank you,

    Christa L.

  30. I can see your frustration – but, I actually see the court system working quite often. if we are going to go into battle it is a good idea to go into it with people who know what they are doing – and, this time, we have.

    This is a different world.

  31. Hi,

    I am a single California mother of 3 children who has never been vaccinated as my mom is an herbalist/healer natural healthcare practitioner for over 35yrs and I wouldn’t consider vaccinating my children either.

    We have been denied enrollment from schools (kindergarten and preschool) based on the fact that the doctors note prescription from (a Beverly Hills pediatric doctor who stated if I were to start vaccinating my 5yr old to be up to date it could “kill him”) was not sufficient to exempt my children from the requirements because the prescription note was “not good enough”.

    I’m currently enrolling my kindergartener in homeschool but am moving out of state even though i have no resources or community or friends or family where we are going , and my entire support system is in California.

    Please let me know if you’d need my statements or appearance in any way to help overturn the ridiculous vaccine law.

    Thank you to all the people involved in helping to overturn the law which would make me a “negligent” criminal for not complying with mandatory vaccines – which my 3 sisters and I live free of our whole life – and we are in perfect health without – over 30 years later – thanks Mom.

    And Thank you,

    Christa L.

    Sent from my iPhone

  32. My family is very hopeful that this will work! Thank you so much for following through with this for all of us! Keeping the fingers crossed!

  33. We know that EVERY VACCINE damages the person that is being poison injected. This is required to stimulate antibody production. We know that because Cellular Immunity part of the immune system is not activated from a vaccine that “HERD IMMUNITY” does NOT HAPPEN from any vaccine. We know that the extent of the damage created by the vaccine greatly affects decreasing the overall immunity of the vaccine victim allowing many detrimental disease states to have an increased probability. We know any antibodies created by a vaccine cannot be cloned and diminishes rapidly creating a CARRIER of disease by the vaccinated population. A study of disease history relating to the introduction of vaccines clearly shows vaccines had little to no effect on eradicating infectious diseases. Promotion of misinformation, lies, and obfuscation of the truth regarding safety and efficacy of vaccines has been a concerted effort of vaccine manufacturers and FRAUD created by the CDC as has been recently disclosed regarding Autism.

    To make any vaccine mandatory while completely preventing a parent that is responsible for the welfare and safety of their children from being able to obtain legal relief from a doctor or drug company manufacturing the vaccine causing the damage is eliminating the civil rights of that parent while leaving the parent to be damaged financially, emotionally, and creating an undue burden, by force, against all decency while promoting the technology that created the problem.

  34. I am a parent of an unvaccinated child in a public school in Orange County, CA. I am very interested in participating in this movement, since my son’s education is at risk. Please, contact me. I need directions.

    I have called Sacramento. I have sent letters and emails. I have done extensive research. But I know, if it is just me, there will be no change. We need to be united.

  35. Hello. I am still a confused about the PBEs in California. I have two children, 4 and 6 years old going into TK and 1st grade this coming school year (2016-2017) starting on 8-16-2016.
    I filed PBEs (authorized by their doctor) for both children in June 2015. I did not file PBEs in 2016 because the schools did not request them again. Based on these facts, will my PBEs, which were filed in California before 2016, remain valid for the 2016-2017 school year and in later years? Or, will I be forced to vaccinate them? Any helpful advise will be greatly appreciated. Thank you so much.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.