Polevoy
Thrashes Barrett and Grell in California
- Piles of Money Change Hands...
Opinion by Consumer Advocate
Tim
Bolen
Saturday,
July 23rd, 2011
It's time for a good
laugh.
Quackbusters, living
in fear of discovery of their
emasculation, have just settled two
court cases secretly. Huge
piles of money have changed hands in the
two cases.
HUGE piles...
In short - There is a
court case in California (Barrett v
Clark) where the quackpot menace was so
badly defeated, so soundly embarrassed,
so stomped on, that recently (insert
heavy laughter here) they secretly
settled out the case paying an
undisclosed huge amount of money to
Ilena Rosenthal. Rosenthal, and her
attorneys, have been pursuing the
threesome for money owed Rosenthal -
close, by now, to $500,000 US.
What it's all about can be found
here.
But to be
able to get to the point where they could pour that
owed money into Rosenthal's bank accounts, they
first had to enter into a secret settlement in a
US/Canada cross-border lawsuit
"Quackbusters Sue Each other - All is Not Well in
Scumville...") involving wanna-be "Czar/God
of US Health Care"
Stephen Barrett, his personal attorney
Christopher Grell, and the almost always-a-loser
Terry Polevoy, Canada's bargain-basement copy of
Barrett.
That case
"Quackbusters Sue Each other - All is Not Well in
Scumville..." gave us all a glimpse of the
internal rot of the quackbuster operation.
The
quackbusters are all about misinformation. The
last thing they want anyone to be aware of is how
badly they actually perform when push comes to
shove. They HAVE TO hide results like this.
What Were They So Afraid the Public
Would Find Out?
(1) Polevoy, it
is obvious, is the quackbuster the
others simply wish would go away.
He has never been appointed to anything.
He is the kid nobody plays with, so to
speak, and nobody ever says why that is.
For him to come forward and thrash
Stephen Barrett in court publicly is
just something they don't want people to
know about.
(2) Had the
case gone further, without settlement,
"discovery" would have occurred, and one
of the major items that would have come
to surface would have been the reasons
why Polevoy is no longer practicing as a
pediatrician in Canada - something
Polevoy avoids talking about.
(3) Polevoy had
named, as Defendants, twenty John Does,
meaning that he was going to name twenty
other people, and their activities, in
the case, if Barrett and Grell did not
give him what he needed (the money to
pay Rosenthal). I wrote about this
situation
here.
(4) The
quackbusters lost face massively in the
Barrett v Clark case. They had
trumpeted their horn everywhere they
could announcing their attack on the
Defendants, including myself. But
at the end of the day they simply
couldn't man-up. Viagra wouldn't
have helped them. You can read
about that situation
here.
(5) The
quackbusters were so arrogant in the
Barrett v Clark case that they incurred
the wrath of the GIANTS of the internet:
Barrett tried to re-write internet law
with this case. His notions were so
asininely appalling to the general
internet community that thirty (30)
internet, and publishing, GIANTS filed
Amicus Curie (Friend of the Court)
Briefs on our side.
"Friend
of the Court"
Briefs, arguing in our favor, were provided by
Amazon, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, EBay,
the ACLU of Northern California, AOL, Microsoft,
Yahoo, Google, ABC, Ask Jeeves, the Cable News
Network, Compuserve, Earthlink, ESPN, Netscape, SBC
Internet, Time Warner, Washington Post, Association
for Competitive Technology, California Newspaper
Publishers Association, Information Technology of
America Association, Internet Commerce Coalition,
National Cable and Telecommunications Association,
Netchoice, NetCoalition, Newspaper Association of
America, Online News Association, Online Publishers
Association, Technet, and the United State Internet
Service Providers Association."
(6) The
quackbusters, for the most part, are on
their ass these days, and that's not
good for their public image. They
have pretty much fallen back on the
so-called "skeptic" (pseudo-skeptic)
community as their network. And
that organization is not much at all,
primarily relying on anonymity, fake
internet names, and a leadership that
has poor qualifications.
Laugh now - their
embarrassing settlement is no longer a
secret - is it?
One more thing -
Where did Barrett and Grell get the
$500,000 US to pay off Polevoy, so that
Polevoy could pay off Ilena Rosenthal?
I'll bet that Doctor's Data, during
discovery in the
Doctor's Data v Barrett Federal Court
case, will ask Barrett just that
question.
So, of course, Stay tuned.
Tim Bolen - Consumer
Advocate
|
About Bolen Report |
Contact |
News |
Library |
Newsletter Signup |
Search this site |
Back to
Home Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tags: Quackwatch,
Stephen Barrett, Tim Bolen, Ilena Rosenthal, Terry Polevoy, Christopher
Grell, Barrett v Clark, Bolen Report, Jurimed"
|
|
Copyright 2005-2011 by Jurimed Public Relations & Research Group |
All Rights Reserved |