Doctor's Data Laboratory Files
Federal Lawsuit Against Barrett, Quackwatch, NCAHF,
Consumer Health Digest...
Opinion by Consumer Advocate
Tim
Bolen
Friday,
June 25th, 2010
Stephen Barrett,
who has no income of his own, he claims, had to go to
his wife Judith the other day, I think, and say "Honey, I need an increase in my allowance this month.
I'm getting sued in Fed Court in Chicago now, and I'm
going to need $250,000 this month as a retainer, and
another $100,000 per month to pay for my Defense, for
the next year, or so."
On Friday
June 18th, 2010 Doctor's Data Laboratory filed an eleven
count lawsuit in the United States District Court for
the Northern District of Illinois against Stephen J.
Barrett, MD, the National Council Against Health Fraud
Inc (NCAHF), Consumer Health Digest, and Quackwatch, Inc.
More, the
last time I looked, the NCAHF was run out of a cardboard
box in bobbie baratz's hair removal salon in Peabody,
Massachusetts. I can't even imagine where bobbie's
going to get Defense money.
The case
charges the Defendants with (1) Lanham Act
Violations - Restraint of Trade, Deceptive Business
Practices, and Trademark Dilution, (2) Trademark
Dilution under the Illinois Trademark Registration and
Protection Act, (3) Violations of the Illinois
Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, (4)
Violations of the Illinois Deceptive Trade Practices
Act, (5) Business Libel Per Se, (6)
Business Libel Per Quod, (7) Tortuous
Interference with Existing and Potential Business
Relationships, (8) Fraud or Intentional
Misrepresentation, (9) Civil Conspiracy, (10)
Corporate Officer and Board Member Personal Liability,
(11) Temporary and Permanent Injunctive Relief.
The Consumer
Health Digest is, according to Barrett, a joint effort
of quackwatch and the NCAHF, and is jointly edited by
Barrett and
William M. London.
London is employed by the California State University
Los Angeles campus in the Health Sciences Department.
The lawsuit
seeks $5,000,000 in damages and an additional
$15,000,000 in punitive damages from the Defendants,
temporary and permanent injunctions preventing
re-occurrence, plus whatever else the Court deems
suitable.
Of interest
to my readers, I think, is that the last time Barrett
got sued for Libel he used his homeowner's insurance
company to defend him. However, I don't think he
will be able to do that this time. More,
Quackwatch, Inc, the corporation, is defunct.
I'll get you
a copy of the actual case early next week. It has 41
pages in the complaint, and seven Exhibits totaling 35
more pages. And, it is not boring reading...
Stay tuned.
Much more to come...
Tim Bolen - Consumer
Advocate