The SB 277 bill that was signed into law last year is now the subject of a Federal lawsuit, which has the interest of the many who are against mandatory vaccines and lack of informed consent. But there is precedent for mandatory vaccines. The Jacobson decision in 1905 upheld mandatory vaccination. As a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the authority of states to enforce compulsory vaccination laws. The Court’s decision articulated the view that the freedom of the individual must sometimes be subordinated to the common welfare and is subject to the police power of the state.
I have been monitoring the discussion back and forth between two highly respected attorneys who have experience in dealing with vaccine issues as they critiqued the new lawsuit.
Yes, Senate Bill 277, the legislation passed in California to mandate Chinese-made-vaccines force-jammed into California’s innocent children was/is horrible. Yes, the people behind SB 277 qualify as human scum.
Yes, the campaigns to stop, or reverse, SB 277 have been a not funny joke run by people who just do not know how to think things through before they act.
San Diego Federal Judge Dana M. Sabraw denied the Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) presented by the Plaintiffs, so far, for two reasons – BOTH of which attorneys for the Plaintiffs are remedying as fast as possible.
What Exactly is this Nontoxic Approach for Disease Prevention?
Homeoprophylaxis— also known as Homeopathic prophylaxis or even “HP”– is a nontoxic method of disease prevention in use since 1799. The term “homeo” means “like or similar”—note that it does not mean “same”, only similar.
“Prophylaxis” refers to the prevention of a disease. Homeopathy is an energetic form of medicine. It utilizes the energies found in plant, animal, and mineral sources to promote healing and wellness. In like manner, when homeopathy is used as a prophylactic, it utilizes an energetic form of the disease to promote immunity. It has been documented to do this with about 90% success. The body is exposed to an energetic form of the disease and is found to respond appropriately, “as if” it had been exposed to the disease itself. Thus, all the benefits of natural disease are derived without any of the risks.
Let’s define, as well, what a “vaccine” is. The idea of inserting a particle of a disease into the body to promote an immunological response has technically been done for about a thousand years (1), not always successfully. During Edward Jenner’s time, he noted how milkmaids, who were around cows all the time, did not seem to get the horrid smallpox. He noted that cows would get a similar disease, known as cowpox, and postulated that it was perhaps this exposure to cowpox that prevented smallpox in milkmaids. Thus began his fussing about with the pus of cowpox to provide immunity to smallpox in people. From this came the term, “vaccine”, from the Latin word, vacca, for cow. Mass vaccination for smallpox was later discontinued in the U.S. due to many cases of brain damage as a result of the vaccine, as well as the virtual disappearance of smallpox. (2)
It’s always been a mystery to me how President Reagan, generally known for his suspicion of unchecked governmental power, could have signed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which established the so-called “Vaccine Court.” To the parents of many children with autism, this legislation is the direct cause of the autism epidemic.
While researching my new book, INOCULATED: How Science Lost Its Soul in Autism, I came across the answer in the pages of the New York Times. (Full disclosure – In my younger days I was a “Youth Delegate for Reagan” to the 1984 Republican Convention in Dallas. Forgive me. I was young and foolish.) In an article by Robert Pear, which was published on November 15, 1986, in the New York Times entitled, “Reagan Signs Bill on Drug Exports and Payment for Vaccine Injuries,” (and easily accessible through a simple Google search), Reagan laid out his thoughts. Continue reading What Did President Reagan Think About “Vaccine Court?”
There is no question that this SB 277 case will go all the way to the United States Supreme Court. It is designed to do exactly that. The issues argued in it are THAT important to the American scene.
So, get ready for a knock-down, drag-out fight, with those, within our government system, and private drug corporations, who believe that THEY own our bodies, and our children’s bodies, and that THEY, the government of the moment and their corporate cronies, can do whatever THEY want to any American, at any time they choose.
The people we are up against believe in total control of our lives, with THEM making all of the decisions for, and about, us.
It is, if you think about it, the SAME argument coming forward in our Presidential election. Establishment Hillary Clinton is all about BIG Government running us all, and Trump is about bringing the REAL America, economy and all, with its Constitution, back to life.
The fact is that the next US President will decide who fills the empty seats on that US Supreme Court – and will make a difference what kind of Supreme Court we will be standing in front of with our SB 277 case.
So, people, four days ago we were a little anxious about what would happen with the implementation of SB 277. Today, we have landed at Normandy, so-to-speak. Now we need to fight our way into the enemy’s heartland, and take it away from them. Can we do that? Yup…
The Cavalry Has Arrived…
So let’s talk about the upcoming battle.
Now that the lawsuit attacking SB 277 has been filed with the San Diego Federal Court (last Friday, July 1st 2016) it goes into the system.
On Tuesday, July 5th, 2016 it will be given a case number, and will be assigned to a specific Judge, who’s Staff will put it on the schedule for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) action.
So, I called attorney Jim Turner about 5:00AM PST this morning and say “Where’s the case, dude?” He laughed… He’d been up all night. Right now it’s 5:00PM PST on Friday, July 1st, 2016 and I’ve got the final copy of the case against SB 277 in my hands. It will take a while to get this article out – a lot to read, and make phone calls about. But…
I LOVE it.
The case I talked about two days ago has been electronically filed by Carl Lewis in the San Diego Federal Court. I have attached copies of each of the individual document sets to this article. They will be easy to find. Take the time to familiarize yourself.
The actual name of the filing is “Complaint For Declaratory and Injunctive Relief – Temporary Restraining Order Sought.” Below I will explain what all that means.
And, there’s a bunch of backup documents. You can see every one.
I have here, on my desk, a DRAFT copy of the lawsuit to be filed tomorrow, Friday, July 1st, 2016 against SB277 in California. I can’t show you a copy of the final version until the exact moment it is filed. I am sworn to secrecy.
But, There ARE some things I can tell you right now:
(1) My friend Diane Miller JD, sometime Author for the BolenReport, and the head of the Health Freedom Congress, is flying in from Minnesota tomorrow to attend, and speak at, the Santa Monica Rally organized by Wendy Silvers. She will speak on the details of the lawsuit. Go there to hear what she has to say.
(2) I can tell you the names of the attorneys involved and tell you what I know about them. You will be pleased.
(3) I can tell you the basic outline of the case – what the points are, and why the attorneys are going in THOSE SPECIFIC directions. Once again, you will be pleased.
(4) I can tell you WHY there was so much secrecy in the organization of the case – and why I agreed with that tactic.
Ok, some of you were put-off by the “anti-vaxxer” moniker in my last article. Some suggested you’re all health freedom fighters. I’m not willing to bestow that laudatory title until I see a more cohesive, rational and convincing case made, though I’m sure I am a minority of one on this in the health freedom community.
How about the designator “vaccine-concerned” or “VC” for short? It’s neutral, accurately descriptive, and this is my post. From now on, I am going to refer to you as “vaccine-concerned” or “VC.” I mean to include both ends of the VC spectrum, and here are the ends of the spectrum as I see it.
For sure, you are not together.
At one end are those who want vaccination criminalized because it harms everyone who is vaccinated. It includes people who deny that vaccines have had any benefit to mankind, and that it’s all a pharma scheme to suck money from the masses. It also includes the personal freedom people who think the government has no right to force anyone to get any vaccine or impose any consequences on the unvaccinated, regardless of the perceived consequences that the ignorant majority and conventional scientists think will be caused by the unvaccinated.
At the other end of the spectrum are the folks who are concerned that there might be too many vaccines for kids right now, who accept some preservative-free vaccines for some serious diseases, unless there are sound medical contraindications. It also includes those who will compromise their personal freedom to get inoculations before traveling to some foreign countries where diseases survive which have been long extinct in this country. This end of the spectrum also includes those who understand that the VC, who have strongly-held and metaphysically true beliefs, have to acknowledge and work within the system in which they currently represent a minority view. Indeed, these folks even understand that their views are considered by the mainstream to be anti-science and fringe. (See the just published article in the New Yorker entitled “The Mistrust of Science” by mainstream surgeon, author (and medical establishment tool), Atul Gawande. Continue reading MANLY ADVICE FOR MY CALIFORNIA ANTI-VAXXER FRIENDS…
So in California come July 1st, there will no vaccine exemptions based on personal belief. However, there still will be a medical exemption, such as it is.
My understanding is that pediatrics/public health recognizes some contraindications for specific vaccines, but very, very few (if any) contraindications for not giving a child any vaccine anytime. I’ve heard that at least one prominent CAM healthcare attorney is advising his California CAM physician clients not to write medical exemption letters for parents who have a fear of or personal belief against vaccination. That might be prudent advice, and certainly no lawyer will get into trouble for giving it. Obviously, this is all very bad news for anti-vaxers.
You are not going to like this, but…
I will probably weigh-in on what I think are the medically supported justifications for the exemption another time and another forum. For now, I’d like to talk to my anti-vaxer friends and colleagues, including those who for tactical/PR reasons characterize their views as in support of “informed consent” about the “dangers of vaccination”. You’re not going to like it, but to paraphrase Ziggy Martin in “Drive,” who’s gonna tell you when you’re too late and aren’t so great In terms of where we are and the constitutional arguments being tossed around, well, you’re too late, wrong, and less lyrically, the imprecise hyperbolic language is not helping you focus on what may be realistically achievable.
First, the inaccurate hyperbole: California anti-vaxers claim that their kids and child care professionals are being forced by the government to be vaccinated. Not true. I’m from Texas, and in Texas we know what forced vaccination looks like. A couple years ago, the Texas legislature tried to force all young girls to get the HPV vaccine. The measure ultimately failed because of the public outcry against forced vaccination. California is not forcing anyone to get vaccinated. Rather, it imposes consequences (albeit draconian) for the unvaccinated; for kids, no public or private school; for adults, you can’t teach kids or be a child caregiver. That’s a big difference constitutionally and legally in general. But in addition, by mis-framing the issue, you may be missing some realistic partial, medium-term solutions, as I’ll explain in a moment. Continue reading TO MY CALIFORNIA ANTI-VAXXER FRIENDS: HERE’S SOME PROBABLY UNWANTED BUT POSSIBLY USEFUL ADVICE…
It had to happen sooner or later. BolenReport Authors and articles are first rate, so, of course we attracted an official Roman Catholic Church Saint to write for us…
Let us consider the picture: Disease is something that happens that nobody likes. It can be very dangerous. Every year, untold lives are ended prematurely and unpleasantly because of disease.
What can be done to prevent disease is a question pondered by people of medicine since time began.
No one likes to get sick, no parent likes to see their child suffer, diseases can be dangerous—and, with the vaccine, science today claims to have found an approach that fulfills its expressed purpose. Because of what they tell us, the public has grown to not question the holy sacrament of vaccination. Indeed, neither have the scientists, who are currently working on hundreds more vaccines intended to be “fast tracked” upon the public (1). Vaccines are credited with the eradication of many diseases. But let’s take a closer look at what has actually happened. What do the facts really tell us? What have we not been told?
Are Vaccines Necessary?
Injecting foreign proteins into the human body is a medical intervention. We know that medical error constitutes the third leading cause of death in the United States. (2) With the convenience of the internet and readily available information, word is getting out. Medical science doesn’t have all the answers.Continue reading Why Do We Need Vaccines?
The MOST ABHORRENT part of this whole usurping of parental AND adult rights, was the claim that the immunocompromised, need UNRELIABLE, UNSCIENTIFICALLY-PROVEN Vaccine-Induced HERD IMMUNITY for their protection.
People make choices – what they will see and what will remain invisible to them. Like the character, Neo, played by Keeanu Reeves in The Matrix, we are often given the choice to take the blue pill or the red pill. The blue pill allows you to remain in your safe little world. Taking the red pill, well, that opens a Pandora’s Box.
For me, that moment came when my normally developing eighteen-month-old son, Ben, went mute after his vaccinations. His sister, Jacqueline already had autism and seizures, which we later linked to her six-month round of shots. With her, we didn’t know. With Ben, it was absolutely clear what had happened. Ben was my red pill. After putting him on the gluten/casein free diet he came back to us. My daughter is still very severely impaired. Because of my children, I became a warrior.
In 2009 I stumbled across an interview Dr. Judy Mikovits had given in a television show in Nevada called Nevada Newsmakers. Mikovits was talking about the publication of her article in the journal Science which showed that a recently discovered retrovirus, XMRV (xenotropic murine leukemia virus related virus) had been found in 67% of chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) patients and at 3.75% in healthy patients.
Then she started talking about a potential link to autism, as they had done some early research into the question.
I am NOT supportive of the case filed by T. Matthew Phillips. At first I thought to give it a chance, since there didn’t seem to be much else coming forward. But then I watched Phillips’s performance on the various FaceBook groups attacking people I know. Enough said.
Then too, the primary proponent for the case, Sharon Brown, and her performance, to me, lacks a whole lot. A whole lot…
In short, I recommend that everyone just give this package a wide berth. There are other battles to get involved in.
A decade before the US Public Health Service (PHS) and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) made a joint public statement vowing to remove the mercury preservative Thimerosal from vaccines (circa 1999), I was trying to find the science behind the recommendation to give newborns the Hep B vaccine (more about that later).
The interesting thing about that unprecedented declaration by the PHS and the AAP was that there was no public pressure to make that announcement.
There were no protests, letter writing campaigns, distraught mothers of autistic children camping out at AAP headquarters….so, what precipitated this announcement, as shown below, From Pediatrics Sep 1999:
The one REALLY GOOD thing that came out of the passing of California’s Mandatory Vaccine bill SB277 is that it pissed-off and woke-up, a giant political entity. And that entity woke up in a VERY BAD MOOD.
Prior to SB277 certain people were “concerned” about vaccines. Why? EVERYONE knows someone with a vaccine-severely-injured child.
After SB277 “concerned” turned to “very informed” and “keep your needles away from my child you asshole..” thinking.
There hasn’t been such a national political movement since the Vietnam War protests in the 1960s.
And, just like in the Vietnam War protest days, the campaigns are getting more and more sophisticated every day. Why? Because the protesters are SMART people. It is the SMART people who first woke up to the fact that the US Vaccine programs, both Childhood, and Adult, are a massive, murderous, money-making hoax. Continue reading California Legislators Can Run – But They Can’t Hide…
Too often we, here, on the BolenReport, and other publications, talk about the problems of North American Health Care without pointing out, to our readers, that in the Health Freedom Movement WE WIN ALL OF THE TIME…
Part of the reason we win is that we openly communicate problems. And, when we do that there is an effect. We start the ball rolling.
Probably the biggest effect, right now, is that we have driven most of our front-line opposition into hiding – and that is a very important point.
So why, for example, are the supposedly “pro-vax, etc.,” people hiding? When you hunt them down, and drag them out into the light, all becomes evident. Look what we found when we examined nitwit David Gorski (Orac)’s network.
There is NO QUESTION that the monstrous Anti-Vax Movement is scaring the crap out of those that pretend to think that vaccines are safe and effective. Step outside and smell the fear in the air. The signs are everywhere.
Get ready to laugh – I have another story about frustrated pro-vax snivelers to entertain you with. We are dragging another batch of life’s detritus out into the light…
The Honourable Jane Philpott
Minister of Health
Ottawa, ON K1A OA6
Dear Honourable Minister Philpott,
Re: Conviction of David and Collet Stephan in the Meningitis Death of their Son
First, please allow me to say how grateful I am for the many positive ways in which your government has been restoring Canadian values and the Canada I have always believed in.
I am writing to you with very grave concerns about the state of the healthcare system in Canada. I am not referring to surgery wait-times or a shortage of family physicians, I am referring to the fundamental basis on which medicine is being practiced in Canada, and the dangerous role that pharmaceutical companies are now playing.
With the recent conviction of David and Collet Stephan in the tragic death of their son from meningitis, it is clear that our entire medical establishment, with the support of government, media and the courts, has become beholden to the pharmaceutical industry.
From cutting-edge therapies for recovery from autism all the way to activism and everything else that goes along with raising a child with autism and/or vaccine injury, this is where I need to be to hear what I need to hear: Chicago, May 25-29.
I do know, from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)’s Dr. Stephanie Seneff and her research on GMOs, that autism can be more than vaccine injury. Dr. Seneff is coming, and she is there with Zen Honeycutt, the rock star who demanded GMO labeling across the country.