California Civil Code section 3510, “When the reason for a rule ceases, so should the rule itself.”
In 2005, the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, of which the US is a signatory, was created.
From the Declaration: “Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information….The interests and welfare of the individual should have priority over the sole interest of science or society.”
It is simply a violation for human rights under this decade old declaration to coerce an individual to obtain a medical procedure.
When it comes to vaccines, some think the goal of “herd immunity,” is a public health emergency that overrides informed consent, but make note of the fact that hear immunity is just an EPIDEMIOLOGICAL construct and cannot be applied to vaccinated communities. The notion of herd immunity was built on the understanding that children developed immunity to a disease after experiencing it. Today, we are told that vaccines can achieve the same level of immunity, but only if we vaccinate the bulk of the herd.
However outbreaks of childhood illnesses are happening in highly vaccinated communities because vaccines don’t work as advertised. They are unavoidably unsafe (as per the Supreme Court) and their efficacy is often far less than stellar. Continue reading Vaccines, Bioethics and Human Rights…
Until yesterday – and until Laura Hayes stepped up – and Dan Olmstead approved Laura’s article for publication. Thank you Dan…
Laura’s article, called, simply enough, “Vaccines-Elimination Mandatory” was, frankly, the kind of thing you’d find on the BolenReport, or on Sherry Tenpenny MD’s blog, Marcella-Piper Terry blog, etc. Not EVER on Age of Autism. This kind of article, there, is a BIG departure over there, and, frankly, about time.
The Canary Party/Health Choice (CP/HC) crap group got out-maneuvered. They have lost control of the anti-SB 277 lawsuit. The Big Kids have taken it over. About time…
Yes, it was a takeover and it was absolutely necessary. Thousands of people had donated money, I’d guess, without having any idea they were being manipulated into funding a watered-down version of a REAL lawsuit.
They ended up with a watered-down lawsuit that, in actuality, corresponds to the CP/HC policy of NEVER, EVER, criticizing vaccines.
For the last nine years, I’ve been putting the pieces together after my beautiful baby boy regressed into brain damage/autism after a round of toxic vaccines that were administered by our pediatrician’s staff.
I only agreed to those vaccines because I was not aware that there may be serious side effects. We did NOT receive full, informed consent. The information I received for the AB2109 counseling, (introduced by Senator Pan a year before introducing SB277) was incorrect.
Our doctor informed me that “Wakefield’s work was fraudulent”, (even though it has been duplicated more than 30 times), he told me that the vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study has been done, and that the double-blind, placebo safety studies had been done.
I knew from my years of looking through vaccine information that this was totally and completely false. When I asked for the source and the criteria for this counseling session, he showed me the door, but not before beckoning the nurse to fetch the data for these studies I had asked for.
His data turned out to be the green sheet you get at your well-baby visit. You know, the paper that says vaccine injury is rare and you may get swelling at the site. Continue reading SB277: PLAYING TO WIN…
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), all Plaintiffs hereby voluntarily dismiss the above captioned action, without prejudice, as to all Defendants, and without further notice. As grounds therefor, Plaintiffs state that no Defendant has filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment. The parties shall bear their respective costs.
Dated: August 31, 2016 Respectfully submitted, SWANKIN & TURNER
While we are all anxiously awaiting for the preliminary federal court ruling for a Preliminary Injunction order against totalitarian and oppressive SB277, time marches on and the schools are back in session.
During this time period between the SB277 Injunction ruling and school enrollment, there are those that are willing and able to wait it out.
But for everyone else that cannot homeschool or has to return to the normal work schedule, a medical exemption to protect your children should be in the cards.
The expense of a medical exemption is WELL WORTH PROTECTING your CHILD.
Attached to this article is a transcript of the Oral Arguments held in the Preliminary Injunction Hearing August 12th, 2016. You can read every word that was said. But, before you do I am going to give you some background, some definitions, and a roadmap so you can follow what was being said. Why? These are very technical legal arguments I am going to attempt to make simple, and common-sense.
This case is NOT about vaccines – although those ultra-dangerous Made-in-China-death-pus-tubes are the problem the case seems to revolve around.
The real point of the case is simple – what are the limits that the State can do claiming “The Greater Good?” If today they can force dangerous vaccines into our children, tomorrow they can drag our nine-year-olds into sexual slavery, or grind them up into food for cattle for that same claim of “The Greater Good.”
I’m not joking.
It gets really scary when you think that a grinning psychopath/sociopath(?) like California Senator Dicky Pan gets to decide what, exactly, defines “The Greater Good” and who it applies to.
What the Plaintiff’s attorneys are saying to the Court is simple “Where’s the line Judge?” Legal precedent says that the State, under a Strict Scrutiny review, must follow specific rules to make laws. Our side is saying that the State of California did not follow the rules with this law.
Last Friday, August 12th, 2016, SB 277 Lawsuit San Diego Federal Court Judge Dana M. Sabraw, after hearing oral arguments in the Preliminary Injunction Hearing said ”I’ll Give you My Decision in Writing Within Two Weeks”…
You can bet that Judge Sabraw will be very careful with the writing of this legal decision. He, and his staff, will be spending quite some time on it.
Why? This case is going to the US Supreme Court.
The decision to issue, or not issue, a Preliminary Injunction preventing the implementation of SB 277, could be in our hands any minute. Whatever it is we proceed to the next step.
As I’ve said before, whatever happens, the side that loses this hearing will immediately Appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
I always believe there’s a guy (or gal) who knows a guy (or gal) who can get you what you really want.
And what I want, and hopefully what you want, is for me to find a publisher with the guts and integrity to publish my new book, INOCULATED: How Science Lost Its Soul in Autism. And I know that among the countless readers of the Bolen Report, there’s somebody who can start this ball rolling. You just need to be convinced. So let this chapter outline get somebody out there excited about seeing this book in print and causing trouble in the world.
Chapter One: The Call –
Dr. Brian Hooker, a university biology professor was working in his office when he got a call from a senior Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) scientist, Dr. William Thompson. The two worked together years earlier when parent groups were clamoring for the CDC to conduct research into vaccines and autism. Thompson reveals that the CDC found such evidence, but covered it up. Thompson had retained these documents and eventually turned them over to Congressman William Posey. The most explosive of these allegations is that earlier administration of the MMR vaccine is causing a 3.36-fold increase in autism among African-American males. With Thompson’s guidance, Hooker publishes this information in the summer of 2014. Continue reading Inoculated: Looking for a Publisher with Guts and Integrity…
California Senate Bill 277, perhaps the most obvious takeover of State Government by international corporations in America’s history, forcing “Made-in-China” death pus tubes (vaccines) on California’s innocent children, has been legally challenged by the North American Health Freedom Movement.
This newsletter post is aimed directly at my “Old” friends and associates in the North American Health Freedom Movement. But, even if you are not one of those, please continue. I’m telling you, right now, that we, the Health Freedom leaders, need to step in even more than we have, providing BASIC TRAINING for activists. I kid you not.
The situation is so bad in California that the groups that band together, for the most part, have little or no organizational or planning skills. They have no idea what is valuable and what is not. Worse, they compete to be ”LEADER” having NOTHING to offer as leadership. It really is that bad.
In a way – it is our fault…
They lost the first three anti-SB 277 campaigns using amazingly poor tactics and strategies – if you can call ANYTHING they did a “strategy.” It really is “The Blind Leading the Blind…”
They do really DUMB things, and they don’t want ANY advice… I’ll tell you about one of those situations in a minute.
And, they get irate, and whimpery, when somebody like me says “you didn’t do that very well…”
These people think FaceBook is an organizing tool.
With Just Four Days Until The Preliminary Injunction Hearing the Twenty-one Plaintiffs have responded to the State’s Response – the State Response I called the “blah,blah, blah, response,” and it is WONDERFUL.
There is no need for me to explain much of anything. The reply is written in clear language. I have just copied the first few sections right from the Court document. If you want to read the whole thing, just go to the document itself. It reads well.
Two small explanations:
(1) What is “status quo ante?” It is a legal term defined as “the previously existing state of affairs.”
(2) What is “Strict Scrutiny?” Strict scrutiny is a form of judicial review that courts use to determine the constitutionality of certain laws. To pass strict scrutiny, the legislature must have passed the law to further a “compelling governmental interest,” and must have narrowly tailored the law to achieve that interest.
I’m going to bold the sections just below. Why? They are important.
This newsletter is short – there is another right behind it with MORE stuff.
Statement of Facts…
DEFENDANTS IGNORE AND MISREPRESENT THEIR OWN DATA ………………………..3
DEFENDANTS TREAT HEALTHY CHILDREN AS “DISEASE CARRIERS” …………………………………4
DEFENDANTS MISREPRESENT THE PRESENCE OF FETAL TISSUE IN VACCINES AND THE CATHOLIC CHURCH’S POSITION ………………….5
I can already predict the results of the Preliminary Injunction Hearing. I’ll publish the results just as soon as I see the Judge’s signed order. I don’t need to be anywhere around the Courthouse to get that information. So, I don’t need to go there, and neither do you.
My strong suggestion to you – DO NOT GO THERE… Wait for a victory celebration to be scheduled in a public place where you can bring the children, and dress casually – somewhere other than downtown San Diego on a Friday afternoon.
San Diego traffic is described as the 17th worst in the world. Friday afternoons have to be the worst of the worst. Downtown San Diego, around the courthouses, on Friday is one solid traffic jam. You simply cannot get anywhere. For that reason alone anyone with a brain has to decide if the trip there is worthwhile, or not. Then there is the fact that the I5 Freeway is jammed solid, in both directions, on Friday afternoon all the way to San Clemente.
Had there been the opportunity to bring together SB 277 victims in one spot to commiserate about the situation and meet the attorneys and leaders working on the SB 277 lawsuit, and hear them, it might have been something to consider.
Have any of you felt the same way as you’ve tried to book a showing of VAXXED: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe in your hometown or support a screening that somebody had already set up?
I think the most disappointing of the group was a friend who is a fellow attorney and not only did we go to high school, college, AND law school together, but this friend is such a bleeding heart that I don’t think there has been a single injustice over the past thirty-five years that he has not expressed an outrage about. However, it seems that I am the exception.
I have been astounded by the response of some long-time friends who when I say, “Hey, there’s this documentary about a whistle-blower at the CDC and the cover-up of the link between vaccines and autism, do you want to come and see it?” They act like I’m denying the existence of God. No, scratch that. If I asked them to come to a movie about an atheist, I’d get a better response. In very poignant emails back to me they have said that they will not even put at risk their “fugitive and cloistered virtue” (to steal from the poet, John Milton) by exposing themselves to the possibility that the government is lying to them.
There is no question, in my mind, what-so-ever, that Santa Barbara County Health Department’s Charity Dean MD started out to create a “Pilot Program” in California where she, Charity Dean (and her “lobbyist” friends?), would examine all Medical Exemptions for vaccines according to a made-up criteria designed by her (and her “lobbyist” friends?).
Then she was going to report HER definition of “suspicious activity,” through a SECRET NETWORK, directly, to Enforcement Officers at the California Medical Board for purposes of prosecution.
However, Charity got caught. Whoops! Paperwork showed up… and the attorneys for the “Good guys” got a hold of it.
“Moreover, an injunction against the enforcement of the statute in this case would immediately expose millions of California school children and other at-risk individuals to an increased threat of contracting potentially fatal communicable diseases.”
“The public health and welfare must not be allowed to be jeopardized by the subjective beliefs and unfounded conspiracy theories of a small minority of individuals who, against all recognized scientific and legal authority, stubbornly disregard the long-recognized safety and effectiveness of vaccines, and who fail to accept the public health threat that their unsupported opinions have on the lives of others around them.”
The above is just from the Introduction… it gets worse…
I am not a lawyer, but does it impress judges to go on some angry tirade about how screwed up the opposing party is?
I have, right here in front of me, the State of California’s 112 page official response to the SB 277 lawsuit, opposing a Preliminary Injunction August 12th, 2016. It looks as if it was written by that goofball (a child can take 10,000 vaccines at once) Paul Offit MD.
The second paragraph of the State’s “Introduction” says it all. You are going to love what they did.
I’ll explain below.
I sit here with excitement, like, I think, the Russian battle commanders must have felt watching the beginning of “The Charge of the Light Brigade” coming their way, so well portrayed by Alfred Lord Tennyson in 1854. The Light Brigade was armed with sabers (knives) and they attacked a position armed with cannon and rifles.. Continue reading SB 277 Lawsuit – The State Responds…
Yesterday, Kent Heckenlively JD, in a poignant article titled “The Coming War and its Aftermath” pointed out the frustrations of trying to solve the vaccine damage issue in North America. He was right on…
One of the strangest things I have ever come across in my 72 years is the way health care is handled in the United States. It is not a business, nor a social issue. It has become the State Religion.
The State Religion? Yup…
For instance, if our health care system ran our computer industry, starting way back, we’d all, now, be using the equivalent of #2 pencils. They would cost $42,000 each, and you would need a license, and special permission (after adequate studies were performed) to use the eraser.
I’ve been thinking a great deal about the fight against SB 277 and mandatory vaccinations in California as well as the fabulous documentary, VAXXED: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe, detailing the corruption in the CDC’s vaccine program and the revelations of senior CDC scientist, Dr. William Thompson.
I find myself asking a simple question again and again: How do I become the most effective agent for change?
Recently I ran across a quote from one of my long-time idols, Nelson Mandela, and it spoke to what I’m feeling these days. Mandela wrote: “As I walked out the door toward the gate that would lead to my freedom, I knew if I didn’t leave my bitterness and hatred behind, I’d still be in prison.”
After fifteen years of advocacy, one would expect that those I love so deeply would have at least understood my position, but it appears not to be the case. As I have attempted to gather an audience for a showing of the documentary film, VAXXED, I have been surprised by the response of two people from whom I had expected better. Continue reading The Coming War and its Aftermath…