The SB 277 bill that was signed into law last year is now the subject of a Federal lawsuit, which has the interest of the many who are against mandatory vaccines and lack of informed consent. But there is precedent for mandatory vaccines. The Jacobson decision in 1905 upheld mandatory vaccination. As a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the authority of states to enforce compulsory vaccination laws. The Court’s decision articulated the view that the freedom of the individual must sometimes be subordinated to the common welfare and is subject to the police power of the state.
I have been monitoring the discussion back and forth between two highly respected attorneys who have experience in dealing with vaccine issues as they critiqued the new lawsuit.
Yes, Senate Bill 277, the legislation passed in California to mandate Chinese-made-vaccines force-jammed into California’s innocent children was/is horrible. Yes, the people behind SB 277 qualify as human scum.
Yes, the campaigns to stop, or reverse, SB 277 have been a not funny joke run by people who just do not know how to think things through before they act.
San Diego Federal Judge Dana M. Sabraw denied the Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) presented by the Plaintiffs, so far, for two reasons – BOTH of which attorneys for the Plaintiffs are remedying as fast as possible.
There is no question that this SB 277 case will go all the way to the United States Supreme Court. It is designed to do exactly that. The issues argued in it are THAT important to the American scene.
So, get ready for a knock-down, drag-out fight, with those, within our government system, and private drug corporations, who believe that THEY own our bodies, and our children’s bodies, and that THEY, the government of the moment and their corporate cronies, can do whatever THEY want to any American, at any time they choose.
The people we are up against believe in total control of our lives, with THEM making all of the decisions for, and about, us.
It is, if you think about it, the SAME argument coming forward in our Presidential election. Establishment Hillary Clinton is all about BIG Government running us all, and Trump is about bringing the REAL America, economy and all, with its Constitution, back to life.
The fact is that the next US President will decide who fills the empty seats on that US Supreme Court – and will make a difference what kind of Supreme Court we will be standing in front of with our SB 277 case.
So, people, four days ago we were a little anxious about what would happen with the implementation of SB 277. Today, we have landed at Normandy, so-to-speak. Now we need to fight our way into the enemy’s heartland, and take it away from them. Can we do that? Yup…
The Cavalry Has Arrived…
So let’s talk about the upcoming battle.
Now that the lawsuit attacking SB 277 has been filed with the San Diego Federal Court (last Friday, July 1st 2016) it goes into the system.
On Tuesday, July 5th, 2016 it will be given a case number, and will be assigned to a specific Judge, who’s Staff will put it on the schedule for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) action.
So, I called attorney Jim Turner about 5:00AM PST this morning and say “Where’s the case, dude?” He laughed… He’d been up all night. Right now it’s 5:00PM PST on Friday, July 1st, 2016 and I’ve got the final copy of the case against SB 277 in my hands. It will take a while to get this article out – a lot to read, and make phone calls about. But…
I LOVE it.
The case I talked about two days ago has been electronically filed by Carl Lewis in the San Diego Federal Court. I have attached copies of each of the individual document sets to this article. They will be easy to find. Take the time to familiarize yourself.
The actual name of the filing is “Complaint For Declaratory and Injunctive Relief – Temporary Restraining Order Sought.” Below I will explain what all that means.
And, there’s a bunch of backup documents. You can see every one.
I have here, on my desk, a DRAFT copy of the lawsuit to be filed tomorrow, Friday, July 1st, 2016 against SB277 in California. I can’t show you a copy of the final version until the exact moment it is filed. I am sworn to secrecy.
But, There ARE some things I can tell you right now:
(1) My friend Diane Miller JD, sometime Author for the BolenReport, and the head of the Health Freedom Congress, is flying in from Minnesota tomorrow to attend, and speak at, the Santa Monica Rally organized by Wendy Silvers. She will speak on the details of the lawsuit. Go there to hear what she has to say.
(2) I can tell you the names of the attorneys involved and tell you what I know about them. You will be pleased.
(3) I can tell you the basic outline of the case – what the points are, and why the attorneys are going in THOSE SPECIFIC directions. Once again, you will be pleased.
(4) I can tell you WHY there was so much secrecy in the organization of the case – and why I agreed with that tactic.
Ok, some of you were put-off by the “anti-vaxxer” moniker in my last article. Some suggested you’re all health freedom fighters. I’m not willing to bestow that laudatory title until I see a more cohesive, rational and convincing case made, though I’m sure I am a minority of one on this in the health freedom community.
How about the designator “vaccine-concerned” or “VC” for short? It’s neutral, accurately descriptive, and this is my post. From now on, I am going to refer to you as “vaccine-concerned” or “VC.” I mean to include both ends of the VC spectrum, and here are the ends of the spectrum as I see it.
For sure, you are not together.
At one end are those who want vaccination criminalized because it harms everyone who is vaccinated. It includes people who deny that vaccines have had any benefit to mankind, and that it’s all a pharma scheme to suck money from the masses. It also includes the personal freedom people who think the government has no right to force anyone to get any vaccine or impose any consequences on the unvaccinated, regardless of the perceived consequences that the ignorant majority and conventional scientists think will be caused by the unvaccinated.
At the other end of the spectrum are the folks who are concerned that there might be too many vaccines for kids right now, who accept some preservative-free vaccines for some serious diseases, unless there are sound medical contraindications. It also includes those who will compromise their personal freedom to get inoculations before traveling to some foreign countries where diseases survive which have been long extinct in this country. This end of the spectrum also includes those who understand that the VC, who have strongly-held and metaphysically true beliefs, have to acknowledge and work within the system in which they currently represent a minority view. Indeed, these folks even understand that their views are considered by the mainstream to be anti-science and fringe. (See the just published article in the New Yorker entitled “The Mistrust of Science” by mainstream surgeon, author (and medical establishment tool), Atul Gawande. Continue reading MANLY ADVICE FOR MY CALIFORNIA ANTI-VAXXER FRIENDS…
So in California come July 1st, there will no vaccine exemptions based on personal belief. However, there still will be a medical exemption, such as it is.
My understanding is that pediatrics/public health recognizes some contraindications for specific vaccines, but very, very few (if any) contraindications for not giving a child any vaccine anytime. I’ve heard that at least one prominent CAM healthcare attorney is advising his California CAM physician clients not to write medical exemption letters for parents who have a fear of or personal belief against vaccination. That might be prudent advice, and certainly no lawyer will get into trouble for giving it. Obviously, this is all very bad news for anti-vaxers.
You are not going to like this, but…
I will probably weigh-in on what I think are the medically supported justifications for the exemption another time and another forum. For now, I’d like to talk to my anti-vaxer friends and colleagues, including those who for tactical/PR reasons characterize their views as in support of “informed consent” about the “dangers of vaccination”. You’re not going to like it, but to paraphrase Ziggy Martin in “Drive,” who’s gonna tell you when you’re too late and aren’t so great In terms of where we are and the constitutional arguments being tossed around, well, you’re too late, wrong, and less lyrically, the imprecise hyperbolic language is not helping you focus on what may be realistically achievable.
First, the inaccurate hyperbole: California anti-vaxers claim that their kids and child care professionals are being forced by the government to be vaccinated. Not true. I’m from Texas, and in Texas we know what forced vaccination looks like. A couple years ago, the Texas legislature tried to force all young girls to get the HPV vaccine. The measure ultimately failed because of the public outcry against forced vaccination. California is not forcing anyone to get vaccinated. Rather, it imposes consequences (albeit draconian) for the unvaccinated; for kids, no public or private school; for adults, you can’t teach kids or be a child caregiver. That’s a big difference constitutionally and legally in general. But in addition, by mis-framing the issue, you may be missing some realistic partial, medium-term solutions, as I’ll explain in a moment. Continue reading TO MY CALIFORNIA ANTI-VAXXER FRIENDS: HERE’S SOME PROBABLY UNWANTED BUT POSSIBLY USEFUL ADVICE…
It had to happen sooner or later. BolenReport Authors and articles are first rate, so, of course we attracted an official Roman Catholic Church Saint to write for us…
Let us consider the picture: Disease is something that happens that nobody likes. It can be very dangerous. Every year, untold lives are ended prematurely and unpleasantly because of disease.
What can be done to prevent disease is a question pondered by people of medicine since time began.
No one likes to get sick, no parent likes to see their child suffer, diseases can be dangerous—and, with the vaccine, science today claims to have found an approach that fulfills its expressed purpose. Because of what they tell us, the public has grown to not question the holy sacrament of vaccination. Indeed, neither have the scientists, who are currently working on hundreds more vaccines intended to be “fast tracked” upon the public (1). Vaccines are credited with the eradication of many diseases. But let’s take a closer look at what has actually happened. What do the facts really tell us? What have we not been told?
Are Vaccines Necessary?
Injecting foreign proteins into the human body is a medical intervention. We know that medical error constitutes the third leading cause of death in the United States. (2) With the convenience of the internet and readily available information, word is getting out. Medical science doesn’t have all the answers.Continue reading Why Do We Need Vaccines?
The MOST ABHORRENT part of this whole usurping of parental AND adult rights, was the claim that the immunocompromised, need UNRELIABLE, UNSCIENTIFICALLY-PROVEN Vaccine-Induced HERD IMMUNITY for their protection.
I am NOT supportive of the case filed by T. Matthew Phillips. At first I thought to give it a chance, since there didn’t seem to be much else coming forward. But then I watched Phillips’s performance on the various FaceBook groups attacking people I know. Enough said.
Then too, the primary proponent for the case, Sharon Brown, and her performance, to me, lacks a whole lot. A whole lot…
In short, I recommend that everyone just give this package a wide berth. There are other battles to get involved in.
The one REALLY GOOD thing that came out of the passing of California’s Mandatory Vaccine bill SB277 is that it pissed-off and woke-up, a giant political entity. And that entity woke up in a VERY BAD MOOD.
Prior to SB277 certain people were “concerned” about vaccines. Why? EVERYONE knows someone with a vaccine-severely-injured child.
After SB277 “concerned” turned to “very informed” and “keep your needles away from my child you asshole..” thinking.
There hasn’t been such a national political movement since the Vietnam War protests in the 1960s.
And, just like in the Vietnam War protest days, the campaigns are getting more and more sophisticated every day. Why? Because the protesters are SMART people. It is the SMART people who first woke up to the fact that the US Vaccine programs, both Childhood, and Adult, are a massive, murderous, money-making hoax. Continue reading California Legislators Can Run – But They Can’t Hide…
The VACCINE HOLOCAUST DENIALISTS never, ever, imagined that there would be an anti-vax uprising of this magnitude. To them, all Americans are sheep.
Paul Offit actually thought he was SO WONDERFUL that no one would ever question his “10,000 vaccines at once” nonsense. Now he’s a laughing-stock avoiding “opportunities” to get those 10,000 vaccines jabbed into his ass at one sitting.
For more than three decades Merck has had the exclusive license from the FDA to manufacture mumps vaccine in the USA. It was first approved in 1967 and the same strain used then is being used today. Originally, it was in a single dose vaccine but after 1971, it was incorporated in the MMR vaccine and seven million doses a year are sold in the USA.
In order to obtain that original license, Merck had to prove to the FDA that the vaccine had at least 95% efficacy. That means that over 95% of those getting the vaccine will show an adequate antibody response. This antibody response is assumed to be the same as being immunized, but that is not always the case – just having an antibody response to a vaccine does not mean one is immunized, but that is a minor point that gets ignored. Be that as it may, that is not what this post is about. Continue reading Mumps outbreak at Harvard – because the vaccine is apparently a fraud
When Tim Bolen, writer, editor and publisher of the BolenReport, told me he needed writers for his new project, and why he was approaching ME, I was a bit apprehensive about taking on yet another project. Running the AWAKE California Facebook page is a 24/7 job in and of itself.
When he told me about the direction that the BolenReport is taking and the reach that it will achieve, I got really excited. We need so many organizational tools to help bring activists together in the health freedom movement; especially here in California, which is ground zero for the forced vaccination mandates that are sweeping the country.
The Fight For California…
So as Tim and I were talking, he asked me to focus on California and the need for activists to be plugged into what is going on here in our State. We also need a way to communicate with activists directly, and not just on Facebook. This gave me some ideas.
First, let me start off by saying, it’s a wonderful thing that so many California activists are willing and able to take action when they see a need. And I do believe that most of us are on the same team and want our health freedom rights restored. That is good news.
We’ve had many positive actions taken by so many health freedom activists, the Learn the Risk campaign, Beyond The PBE Factor…What Now? Facebook page, Campaign for Liberty, Million Mamas Movement, Los Angeles Against SB277 Facebook Page, Stop the Spraying of Orange County Facebook Page and so many others. Continue reading The Need For Transparency…
Anne Dachel, author of The Big Autism Cover-Up, wanted the public to know what the reviewers from the New York Times and other controlled main stream outlets were really saying in their lame reviews of Dr. Wakefield’s film.
So, she has translated their double-speak into clear unambiguous English:
We’ve been helping to cover up the link between an unsafe, unchecked vaccine schedule and autism for so long, we can’t suddenly start to legitimately report on this topic.
We’re so dependent on advertising revenue from the pharmaceutical industry that we won’t say anything that could jeopardize that income.
California Senator Richard Pan probably thought he was headed for the Presidency of the United States, carried into office on mountains of drug lord money, once he successfully pushed through America’s first Mandatory Vaccine law, SB277, in California, last year.
No one in the Pan ranks EVER, I think, counted on the reaction Americans would take to forcefully injecting American children with “Made-in-China,” un-tested for use, toxic death pus mixtures, claiming them to be “Safe and Effective.” And, that reaction is huge, and growing larger yet every day. Good.
Safe and Effective?
Vaccines are no such thing. Never have been. Never will be. It is all a huge money making murderous child-damaging scam.
So far – some of both. Three losses in a row, but the beginnings of a real counter campaign.
I don’t hesitate to point out the deficiencies of the so called Canary Party/Health Choice (CP/HC) band of self-congratulatory bird brains. Their efforts to run any issue campaign are legendary. They are just too exemplary of the “wrong” thing to do. Why bother to explain wrongness when all you have to do is point your finger. They are arrogantly immersed in their own stupidity.
In health issue projects it’s simple – if CP/HC is there, on your side, you are going to lose, but there will be important looking photos taken.
When I first noticed this group, and watched them have their photo taken with a Congressman, I actually thought that that photograph was taken, like REAL activist groups do, in relationship to some project they working on with that Congressman. When it was explained to me that “No, the photo was the end result…” I looked on the situation with a frown, and said “What? That’s silly. That can’t be true”
But it turned out to be very true. The CP/HC group either doesn’t have a clue on how to run a campaign, or they don’t want to, or both. For them, it is all about “appearance.” The “appearance” of running a campaign – not actually succeeding at one. Lots of drama, but never a victory.
More, whenever there is LOSS, like three-in-a-row now, there they stand, preening, congratulating themselves on their wonderfulness, seemingly oblivious to the fact that the “No on SB277” effort is in shambles.