What Has Happened to the Democratic Party in California?

“Nearly 30 years ago, an essay in Mother Jones magazine asked: “Would JFK Be a Hero Now?” If the answer wasn’t obvious then, it certainly is now. In today’s political environment, a candidate like JFK — a conservative champion of economic growth, tax cuts, limited government, peace through strength — plainly would be a hero. Whether he would be a Democrat is a different matter altogether.” -Boston Globe

Opinion By Karri Lewis AWAKE California

The California and National Democratic Party are no longer the Kennedy-Loving, Blue-Collar, Working Man’s Party of the People.

The Democratic Party used to be the Working Man’s Party of the People.

According to the Boston Globe,

“He (JFK) was anything but a big-spending, welfare-state liberal. “I do not believe that Washington should do for the people what they can do for themselves through local and private effort,” Kennedy bluntly avowed during the 1960 campaign. One of his first acts as president was to institute a pay cut for top White House staffers, and that was only the start of his budgetary austerity. “To the surprise of many of his appointees,” longtime aide Ted Sorensen would later write, he “personally scrutinized every agency request with a cold eye and encouraged his budget director to say ‘no.’

On the other hand, he was a Cold War anticommunist who aggressively increased military spending. He faulted his Republican predecessor for tailoring the nation’s military strategy to fit the budget, rather than the other way around. “We must refuse to accept a cheap, second-best defense,” JFK said during his run for the White House. He made good on that pledge, pushing defense spending to 50 percent of federal expenditures and 9 percent of GDP, both far higher than today’s levels. Speaking in Texas just hours before his death, he proudly took credit for building the US military into “a defense system second to none.”

It really is time to face Reality. The communist wing and welfare state of the Democratic Party is NOT working.

Continue reading What Has Happened to the Democratic Party in California?

Communism, Common Sense, and What Senator Richard Pan Intends For California’s Children…

Part 3 in the developing, “California State Senator Richard “The State Owns Your Child” Pan is At it Again…”

Opinion By Karri Lewis AWAKE California  

According to the US Supreme Court in the 1979 Parham Versus J.R Case:


California Senator Richard Pan’s attack on Californian’s Parental Rights has morphed into an all out assault on family and religious rights – in complete defiance of the US Constitution.

Senate Bill 18 is the culmination of all of a totalitarian socialist state’s hatred for liberty and freedom.

Called a “Spot Bill,” Senate Bill 18 is, according to the California legislative analyst, a bill that amends a code section in such an innocuous way as to be totally nonsubstantive. The bill has been introduced to assure that a germane vehicle will be available at a later date after the deadline has passed to introduce bills. At that future date, the bill can be amended with more substance included.

Senate Bill 18 is dangerous because it is made to look not harmful or offensive, so that it might pass easily.

Senate Bill 18 allows "professionals" approved by the state to make these decisions and more for your child.
Senate Bill 18 allows “professionals” approved by the state to make these decisions, and more, for your child.

This bill is the FOUNDATION for the rules and regulations that Senator Richard Pan will add at a later date; most likely under the radar and away from the prying eyes of the public.

Senator Pan currently sits on 17 different state committees, including the Children with Special Needs committee, which is ironic considering all of the additional vaccine injuries that his Senate Bill 277 has caused.

Senator Pan has a lot of influence in Sacramento and with the other California Senators.

Many believe that since Senator Pan has strong ties to Big Pharma that he intends to add MANY REQUIRED Medical Interventions for Children.

Continue reading Communism, Common Sense, and What Senator Richard Pan Intends For California’s Children…

Just WHO IS Sponsoring California State Senator Richard Pan’s Destruction of Parental Rights?

 Part 2  in the developing, “California State Senator Richard “The State Owns Your Child” Pan is At it Again…”

Opinion By Karri Lewis AWAKE California

As if hell bent on destroying the family unit; and enacting the state of California as guardian (sic) of ALL of the state’s children, Senator Richard Pan wasted no time in beginning another attack on parental rights.

Senate Bill 18 is a parent’s worst nightmare come true.

In a townhall event put on by Senator Richard Pan in June 2016, it was announced that James P. Steyer from Common Sense Media was co-hosting the, “Talk with Experts and Provide your Input on the Children’s Bill of Rights Legislation,” advertised event.

Jim Steyer Common Sense Media
Jim Steyer Common Sense Media

The flyer with that information can be found here.

This describes the non-profit, Common Sense Media’s mission statement according to Wikipedia:

“Common Sense Media reviews thousands of movies, TV shows, music, video games, apps, web sites and books. Based on developmental criteria, the reviews provide guidance regarding each title’s age appropriateness, as well as a “content grid” that rates particular aspects of the title including educational value, violence, sex, gender messages and role models, and more. For each title, Common Sense Media indicates the age for which a title is either appropriate or most relevant. An overall five-star quality rating is also included, as are discussion questions to help families talk about their entertainment. In addition to Common Sense Media’s traditional rating system, they also offer a set of learning based ratings, which are designed to determine complex educational values.[7][10]

Common Sense Media partners with a number of media companies that distribute the organization’s free content to more than 100 million homes in the United States. According to Common Sense Media’s website, the organization has content distribution contracts with Road Runner, TiVo, Yahoo!, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, DIRECTV, Disney, NBC Universal, Netflix, Best Buy, Google, AOL/Huffington Post, Fandango, Trend Micro, Verizon Foundation, Nickelodeon, Bing, Cox Communications, Kaleidescape, AT&T, and NCM.[11] The organization’s current rating system differs from the system used by the Motion Picture Association of America and the Entertainment Software Rating Board. It has received positive support from parents, and was singled out by US President Barack Obama as a model for using technology to empower parents.[12][13] Common Sense Media began allowing studios to use their ratings and endorsements in order to promote family-friendly movies in 2014. The first film to use the endorsement was Disney’s Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day.[14]”

Why on earth would Common Sense Media, a supposedly family friendly company, support the stealing of parental rights by the state of California via Senator Richard Pan?

Back to that question in a second.

Continue reading Just WHO IS Sponsoring California State Senator Richard Pan’s Destruction of Parental Rights?

California State Senator Richard “The State Owns Your Child” Pan is At It Again…

Opinion by Karri Lewis AWAKE California

Like a prize fighter intent on pleasing his sponsors, California State Senator and Medical Doctor, Richard Pan is back to his parental-rights-stealing-ways.

Talk about Deja-Vu!

14716268_10209567633421967_1641069469930967316_nAs if 2015’s Senate Bill 277; the stealing of parental rights for the right of pharmaceutical companies to forcibly inject poison into innocent school children (vaccinations), in exchange for Pharmaceutical Money and Vacations wasn’t enough; Senator Pan has set his sights on the State Ownership of ALL of California’s Children.
Anyone noticing a theme here?

Introduced by Senator Pan on December 5, 2016, this is where Senate Bill 18 comes into play.

While the title of the bill seems innocuous, “Bill of Rights for Children and Youth in California,” this bill expands the California Bureaucracy’s endless control over your child.

Continue reading California State Senator Richard “The State Owns Your Child” Pan is At It Again…

Knowing What We All Know – WHO Would Vote For Hillary Clinton?

2016 Democrats – That’s Who.

The Moral and Ethical Decline of a Significant Segment of the American Populace…

Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen


It has been common knowledge, for a long time, that Hillary Clinton, and her husband, Bill, are not the kind of people the average American would want as neighbors.

Likely, they’d steal your lawnmower, poison your dog, smash up your car. Hillary’s angry screaming would keep the entire neighborhood awake every night – before, and after, an almost endless line of  sex partners for both of them – were brought, and taken away, in police vehicles.  According to the newest Anthony Weiner computer seizure records, quite a few of those sex partners were/are unwilling children.

Typical Democrats right?

Well, not actually too far afield…

What, Exactly, is a 2016 Democrat?

(1)  For one thing, and most important, is that the typical 2016 Democrat does NOT find a whole lot wrong with Hillary and Bill’s activities.  That fact, says volumes..

Volumes.  Frankly ALL 2016 Democrats are all about a sense of “Entitlement.”

Continue reading Knowing What We All Know – WHO Would Vote For Hillary Clinton?

Taking Back Health Freedom in California, One Candidate at a Time…

OK, in the interest that Tim Bolen doesn’t tell anymore “Trophy Wife” stories, even though that story was completely adorable and Jan has to put up with so much; I decided that I needed to write another article that is pertinent to defeating forced vaccination mandates.

Opinion by: Karri Lewis AWAKE California


In local California political races, there are two great candidates that need our support.

I first met Fullerton City Council candidate, Joe Imbriano, when we connected through the AWAKE California facebook page. In the very early stages of senate bill 277, we spoke on the phone a few times. Our discussions were about stopping this terrible infringement on parental rights and the horrible consequences of forced vaccinations.

Continue reading Taking Back Health Freedom in California, One Candidate at a Time…

Of Course I Have a “Trophy Wife” – I Deserve One…

And I Married Her Fifty-One Years Ago Today…

Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen

I met her when she was sixteen.  I was an old, and worldly nineteen year-old, home on Christmas leave with the United States Navy.

My parents had moved from Michigan to California in mid-1962, my Dad selling his Pharmacy interests in Grand Rapids, to head for the High Desert Antelope Valley where the winters weren’t nearly so devastating to my Mother’s bones broken so long ago in an auto accident before I was born.  Indeed, the Doctors were right about the warmth of the American Southwest.  Mom got a new life.

Dad easily got a job with Los Angeles County.  There, with a conversation with co-workers it was determined that one of those had a daughter in a Catholic Girl’s school in Los Angeles who would, also, would be home for the Christmas holidays.  One day, aboard ship, I got the only letter I ever got from my Dad, explaining the plan where I would meet this girl.

And, then I got a letter from the girl…


And then we met…

Continue reading Of Course I Have a “Trophy Wife” – I Deserve One…

Vaccines, Bioethics and Human Rights…

by: KP Stoller, MD, FACHM  www.incurable-me.com


California Civil Code section 3510, “When the reason for a rule ceases, so should the rule itself.”

In 2005, the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, of which the US is a signatory, was created.logo_en

From the Declaration:
“Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information….The interests and welfare of the individual should have priority over the sole interest of science or society.”

It is simply a violation for human rights under this decade old declaration to coerce an individual to obtain a medical procedure.

When it comes to vaccines, some think the goal of  “herd immunity,” is a public health emergency that overrides informed consent, but make note of the fact that hear immunity is just an EPIDEMIOLOGICAL construct and cannot be applied to vaccinated communities. The notion of herd immunity was built on the understanding that children developed immunity to a disease after experiencing it. Today, we are told that vaccines can achieve the same level of immunity, but only if we vaccinate the bulk of the herd.

However outbreaks of childhood illnesses are happening in highly vaccinated communities because vaccines don’t work as advertised. They are unavoidably unsafe (as per the Supreme Court) and their efficacy is often far less than stellar. Continue reading Vaccines, Bioethics and Human Rights…

How YOU can Stand With Sears

Update by Alan Hysinger

As many of you already know, the California Attorney General has filed a complaint against Dr. Bob Sears with the California Medical Board, for writing a Medical Exemption for a vaccine injured child. This despite Senator Pan’s reassurances that the Medical Exemption would remain a viable option for children needing it.

This is the line in the sand. What’s at stake here is your Doctor’s freedom to be a Doctor and use their own skills and analysis to determine if a treatment is valid for a patient.

Continue reading How YOU can Stand With Sears

Donald and Hillary Go Into A Bakery on the Campaign Trail…

As soon as they enter the bakery, Hillary steals three pastries and puts them in her pocket.

She says to Donald, “See how clever I am? The owner didn’t see anything and I don’t even need to lie.”

“I will definitely win the election.”

The Donald says to Hillary, “That’s the typical dishonesty you have displayed throughout your entire life, trickery and deceit. I am going to show you an honest way to get the same result.”

Donald goes to the owner of the bakery and says, “Give me a pastry and I will show you a magic trick.”

Intrigued, the owner accepts and gives him a pastry. Trump swallows it and asks for another one.

The owner gives him a second one. Trump eats it.

Then Donald asks for a third pastry –  and eats it too.

The baker is starting to wonder where the magic trick is and asks, “What did you do with the pastries?” Continue reading Donald and Hillary Go Into A Bakery on the Campaign Trail…

A Few Things, California…

Gearing Up for a Coalition?

Opinion By Karri Lewis – AWAKE California

While the people of California have some challenging times ahead of them in the fight for health freedom, there are folks that are gathering and willing to work together with TRANSPARENCY and PERSONAL ACCOUNTABILITY.

Why is THIS so Important?

In Peter McCarthy’s recent blog post, “The Texas Health Freedom Coalition (THFC): “Who we are, why we work together in Texas, and how we came to do that….”, McCarthy explains the WHY and HOW the 55,000 member Texas Health Freedom Coalition became extremely successful:

The four areas of agreement…
55.000 Member Texas Health Freedom Coalition Guides Texas State legislation and more…

(1)  The meeting was significant in a number of ways. First, the participants agreed to cooperate under the umbrella of the newly formed Texas Health Freedom Coalition (THFC).

The rationale was that a large umbrella organization acting cooperatively would be more influential, by virtue of their greater numbers, at the state legislature than a number of smaller groups, and simultaneously would be less vulnerable to attacks by the trade union organizations seeking to monopolize various segments of the health care field.

(2)  Second, since the THFC would be the actor of record, the credit for victories and advances would be shared among the groups as a coalition. Each group would play its own meaningful role, and it was agreed that no single group would claim primary credit. As Radhia so aptly stated, “united we stand, divided we fall.”

(3)  Third, our interactions among the groups would be transparent. While each group would, of course, continue to operate within their own governing structure, their THFC-related activities and decisions would be visible to all. No behind-the-scenes jockeying for advantage, no intramural squabbles, and no ego trips.

(4)  Fourth, the groups agreed to work together on issues of common interest, with no public criticism of another group’s individual organizational agendas. Those common interest items were two: advancing health freedom of choice legislation in Texas and opposing the Texas dietitians who, as it turned out, had betrayed the clinical nutritionists and were now pursuing exclusionary licensing legislation benefiting only themselves.

Additionally, every one of the Texas leaders attending that meeting did so in their collective capacity as volunteers. There were no professional state level organizational leaders, which meant that no one had an overriding personal (i.e., economic) agenda.

The final agenda item was the selection of the THFC chair. To my surprise, I was asked to fill that position. In hindsight, it made sense. The combination of my military/organizational background and the equally important fact that I represented no organization other than one advocating strictly for health freedom meant that I could assume the role of honest broker, should any intramural disputes arise.

Continue reading A Few Things, California…

Millions of California Children, Immunocompromised; Put at Risk by the California State Legislature’s Compulsory Vaccine Schedule

Opinion by Karri Lewis

Under the guise of protecting the immunocompromised, last year the California State Legislature passed senate bill 277 and senate bill 792.

Senate bill 277 took away people’s informed consent rights by eliminating the personal and religious belief exemptions for the vaccines required for a public and private education.


Senate bill 792, also targeted adults, which includes; preschool teachers, day care workers and parent volunteers, for removal of informed consent rights, in regards to compulsory vaccination.


The MOST ABHORRENT  part of this whole usurping of parental AND adult rights, was the claim that the immunocompromised, need UNRELIABLE, UNSCIENTIFICALLY-PROVEN Vaccine-Induced HERD IMMUNITY for their protection.

‘Herd Immunity’: the misplaced driver of universal vaccination

Continue reading Millions of California Children, Immunocompromised; Put at Risk by the California State Legislature’s Compulsory Vaccine Schedule

What’s Wrong with American Health Care?

By Richard Jaffe Esq.

Tim Bolen’s Note:   My friend, attorney Rick Jaffe, is a lion in attorney clothing.  He fears no one.  In cutting edge health care circles he’s the litigator to call when the enemy is at the gate.  His client list is a who’s who of the cutting-edge health world.  I was having lunch with Rick at the Cal-Jam Event in Costa Mesa, California, talking about my BolenReport revision project – when I looked across the table and thought to myself “Holy Moley! This guy knows stuff about the problems of health care that even I don’t know…  Hmmmm?” – and an idea was born.  So, I said “Hey Rick, what’s wrong with the US health care system?   Just below is his response…

Recently, the esteemed publisher/editor/writer of the Bolen Report asked me what I thought was wrong with the US healthcare system.  I was taken aback. Even though I have been involved in health care cases, organizations, and legislative initiatives for a long time, I don’t often get asked big picture questions. I thought it might be a nice change of pace to put down some of my observations and general critiques of the system based on my 30 years in the healthcare arena and as a consumer of health care services. So here goes. Continue reading What’s Wrong with American Health Care?

We’ve Moved the BolenReport to a New Neighborhood…

It wasn’t easy.  But it was worth it.

Now, we can begin the new project.  Most of our new Authors have written articles.  Each of which are superb.

As you noticed, Ken Stoller MD wrote three new articles, testing, as it were, how well the system worked.  It worked better than expected.  We had so much traffic on the temporary platform we lost the whole thing while trying to migrate it.

There was a moment of near panic, but the hosting company said “Hold that thought…” and just moved the pointer back to the original platform where everything still was.  Their advice?  “Let’s move this in the middle of the night” – which we did, and when I woke up this morning, it was all right there.  And now we begin… Continue reading We’ve Moved the BolenReport to a New Neighborhood…

Doctor’s Data v Barrett Case  – The Discovery Dam Has Been Burst… Part One:  The privilege removal.

Things are about to get VERY, VERY bad for Stephen Barrett, his co-conspirators, minions, and supporters. 

Opinion by Consumer Advocate  Tim Bolen 

The judge in the Doctor’s Data v Barrett case has come down hard, very hard, on Stephen Barrett and the other Defendants regarding their refusal to provide Discovery documents demanded by the Plaintiff Doctor’s Data’s attorneys.

The judge’s Order to Compel carries significant penalties, including the threat of arrest of Barrett, under the “Contempt of Court” rules, for failure to comply with the Order.  And they, the Defendants, have only until September 12th, 2012 (four days from now), to clean up their act. Continue reading Doctor’s Data v Barrett Case  – The Discovery Dam Has Been Burst… Part One:  The privilege removal.

Affidavit of Tim Bolen

I, Tim Bolen, under oath, state as follows:

  1. Professionally, I am  (a)  the President of JuriMed Public Relations research Group, Inc; a Crisis Management Consultant company in the health care industry.  (b)  a Consumer Advocate specializing in the problems of “cutting-edge” health care.
  2. As a Crisis Management Consultant, my clients are almost exclusively “cutting-edge” health care practitioners.  For them we provide a wide variety of services including assistance to their attorneys, expert witnesses for Court cases, organization and coordination of support groups, media positions, legislative support, promotion, convention services, etc.
  3. As a Consumer Advocate I am a severe critic of the existing US health care system.  I am a speaker at health conventions nationwide, regularly a guest on radio shows, and quoted in magazines and newspapers.  The thing I am most known for is that I am the owner, and author of the internet “Millions of Health Freedom Fighters – Newsletter,” a subscriber non-commercial internet newsletter based in California.
  4. My newsletter, its computer systems, etc., are completely lawful, and compliant with California and US laws, including all anti-spam laws.   I have roughly 285,000 subscribers. I have been operating this newsletter, a critique of  “the politics of health care in the US,” since 1999.  Copies of all of those newsletters (over 500 editions) can be found at my websites www.bolenreport.com and www.quackpotwatch.org.
  5. My newsletter is extremely controversial, and generates angry discussion of health issues.  My articles are carefully researched.  I raise issues not found elsewhere in the media.  Indeed, my comments about the problems in the US health care system cannot be found in mainstream media until, sometimes, months after I broadcast a story.
  6. Of my 285,000 newsletter subscribers – I have about 12,000 media, 85,000 employees of government agencies involved in health care, 30,000 health care activists,15,000 environmentalists, 130,000 health care or health industry professionals, and the rest miscellaneous.
  7. I have been attacked, because of my political positions, by an anti-spammer vigilante group, calling themselves the Spamhaus/SPEWS project, on several occasions.  Recently they have been able to completely block my ability to broadcast my newsletter to my subscribers.  ISPs are now afraid to host my newsletter as Spamhaus/SPEWS will shut them down for hosting me.
  8. Currently, my websites are up and running, after I moved them, but I cannot broadcast my newsletter.  Spamhaus/SPEWS falsely claimed “reason” for blocking me is that I supposedly am a “criminal,” in that I send out bulk emails.  But, as shown below, their original written reason used in the first blocklisting tells an entirely different story.  And when I complained to them about their activities, and threatened legal action, they went out of their way to ruin my reputation on the internet.
  9. I have discovered that Spamhaus/SPEWS is  a “vigilante” type organization falsely characterizing themselves as an “anti-spammer” group. They make up their own definition of “spam” and that definition appears to change from day-to-day.  Their definition(s) differ, considerably, from the ones enacted into both US and State laws. In essence anyone they don’t like gets labeled as a spammer and significant damage is done to those victims. The Spamhaus/SPEWS membership, or whatever they call themselves, is a secret.  Those members, or “volunteers,”  use “fake” email addresses and identities.
  10. I have learned, for instance, the identities of several of the Spamhaus/SPEWS “volunteers,” and have discovered that many of them have business interests that compete with those victims they select for “blocking.” I have also learned that several of their “volunteers” are acting in their capacity to benefit their employers.
  11. Spamhaus/SPEWS has, as described below, constantly interfered with my lawful computer system and its operation, and they have or damaged that system, or its operation, in several ways.  These attacks, separately and aggregately, I have discovered, violate both Federal and State laws.
  12. In US law – these attacks are a violation of title 18, United States Code Sections 1030 (Fraud and related activity in relation to a computer),  371 (Conspiracy to commit offense), 241 (Conspiracy against rights), 875(d) (Interstate communications),   1343 (fraud by wire, radio, or television), 1951 (Interference with commerce by threats or violence), 1952 (Interstate and foreign travel or transportation in aid of racketeering enterprises).
  13. In State law – these acts are a violation of State of California Penal Code Section 502 (c) (3), (5) (Computer Crimes) and 518-524 (Extortion), and Missouri Revised Statutes 569.090(1) (Tampering) and 569.097 (Tampering with computer equipment).
  14. Since I am based in California it is important to note that CPC 502 (Computer Crimes) makes it a crime, in California, to interfere, damage, etc., “lawfully created computer data and computer systems.”  My system fits this definition.
  15. 15.   The Background:  In 2003 the US Congress passed a law called the “Can-Spam Act of 2003.” That law defined what could, and could not, be done with“commercial” email broadcasting on the internet within the United States. The law is specific.  The enforcement of the law was handed over to the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
  16. The Can-Spam Act of 2003 was designed to regulate only one kind of email broadcasting – “commercial” email broadcasting, and there was no intent, and the FTC has taken great pains to explain that the Act, and its enforcement of the Act, does not, and will not seek to regulate “free speech,” only “commercial speech,” and then only certain kinds of “commercial speech.”
  17. However, “Spamhaus/SPEWS,” after failing to convince the US Congress to make the anti-spam law much more to their liking (much more restrictive) is enforcing their version of the law – thereby intentionally denying, and infringing on, the rights of Americans.  Spamhaus/SPEWS claims that any bulk email broadcasting that isn’t “opt-in only” is a criminal act – and of course, by US, and most nation’s law, that’s simply not true.  Their bellicose, and rejected by ALL governments, argument is that “no one should get an email they didn’t specifically ask for…”
  18. The leaders of the “anti-spammer vigilantes” are presented by several so-called “blocklist” providers.  A “blocklist” is a device that Internet Service Providers (ISPs) subscribe to that “supposedly” is a list of “criminal spammer’s” (i.e.; violators of the US Can-Spam Act).  That list is organized by the IP addresses (of the so-called spammers). ISPs that subscribe to those “blocklists” then block those “spammer” IPs on that list from delivering mail to their own customers – supposedly keeping criminal spam away from the ISPs own customers.
  19. Ideally, this system should have some merit, but where it falls down is that the “blocklist” providers DO NOT use the US legal definition of “spam” to “block” IPs – they use their own – and they make that definition up as they go along – still calling their victims “criminals.” It is possible with this system to block real spammers, but for the most part it appears they block lawfully operating legitimate businesses from reaching their customers.  Spamhaus alone, claims to block emails to over 500 million recipients.
  20. The largest “blocklist” providers are www.spamhaus.org, and www.spews.org They are best known for giving out false, and misleading information.
  21. The “Spamhaus/SPEWS conspiracy,” use two primary Google internet discussion groups for their purposes.  The first called NANAE (news.admin.net-abuse.email ) is the place where, the policies and attitudes  of the “anti-spammer vigilantes,” can be found.  I collected over a thousand emails from this group, after entering their discussion and asking for information about Spamhaus – and was confronted with sheer “malice,” and “actual malice” for my efforts. I’ll explain below.  In the second discussion group, called NANABl, the participants demanded of my ISP upstream provider that they not only turn off my service, but that they destroy my data, as a condition of having the blocklist removed from all of their customers (details below).
  22. Internet Service Providers (ISP)s, who use their “blocklists,” are unaware of these “blocklist” providers intentional deceit.  www.spamhaus.org, for instance, the largest of the “blocklists,” fraudulently labels anyone, and everyone who sends out bulk emails using US Can-Spam Act 2003 guidelines, “criminals.”  US ISPs, having no other source of information on what constitutes “spam” or “not spam” are misled into believing that a “listing” on www.spamhaus.org, or the other vigilante“blocklists,” indicates that the “listee” is a “criminal” and reacts accordingly, destroying honest businesses, and organizations’ ability to communicate, via email with their customers or constituents.
  23. Moreover, ISPs that refuse Spamhaus/SPEWS rules are then, themselves, blocked until they submit to Spamhaus/SPEWS will.
  24. 24.   In effect, businesses, and organizations in the US, are victimized, put on trial by a secret organization, with no legitimate due process, and destroyed, overnight, on the whim of a hidden group of vigilantes.  I’m one of those victims.
  25. 25.   In California, however, this action by those vigilantes, is a crime – either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on what they do.  In Missouri, where my previous server was shut down, these actions are also crimes.
  26. 26.   The State of California last passed a revision to the California Penal Code Section 502 (Computer Crimes) in 2002.  The latest revision makes it a crime, in California, to interfere, damage, etc., “lawfully created computer data and computer systems.”  And that’s just what the vigilantes are doing every time they interfere with a lawful system in California.  California Penal Code Section (CPC) 502 (Computer Crimes) says, in its introduction:

(a) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to expand the degree of protection afforded to individuals, businesses, and governmental agencies from tampering, interference, damage, and unauthorized access to lawfully created computer data and computer systems. The Legislature finds and declares that the proliferation of computer technology has resulted in a concomitant proliferation of computer crime and other forms of unauthorized access to computers, computer systems, and computer data.

The Legislature further finds and declares that protection of the integrity of all types and forms of lawfully created computers, computer systems, and computer data is vital to the protection of the privacy of individuals as well as to the well-being of financial institutions, business concerns, governmental agencies, and others within this state that lawfully utilize those computers, computer systems, and data.

(c) Except as provided in subdivision (h), any person who commits any of the following acts is guilty of a public offense

(5) Knowingly and without permission disrupts or causes the disruption of computer services or denies or causes the denial of computer services to an authorized user of a computer, computer system, or computer network.

(8) Knowingly introduces any computer contaminant into any computer, computer system, or computer network.

(d)(1) Any person who violates any of the provisions of paragraph (1), (2), (4), or (5) of subdivision (c) is punishable by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or by imprisonment in the state prison for 16 months, or two or three years, or by both that fine and imprisonment, or by a fine not exceeding five thousand dollars ($5,000), or by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment.

  1. Missouri Revised Statutes (MRS) Chapter 569.097 (Computer Crimes) says:

Tampering with computer equipment, penalties.

569.097. 1. A person commits the crime of tampering with computer equipment if he knowingly and without authorization or without reasonable grounds to believe that he has such authorization:

(2) Modifies, destroys, damages, or takes any computer, computer system, or computer network.

  1. Tampering with computer equipment is a class A misdemeanor, unless:

(1) The offense is committed for the purpose of executing any scheme or artifice to defraud or obtain any property, the value of which is five hundred dollars or more, in which case it is a class D felony; or (2) The damage to such computer equipment or to the computer, computer system, or computer network is five hundred dollars or more but less than one thousand dollars, in which case it is a class D felony; or (3) The damage to such computer equipment or to the computer, computer system, or computer network is one thousand dollars or greater, in which case it is a class C felony.

  1. And, Missouri Revised Statutes (MRS) Chapter 569.090 says:

Tampering in the second degree.

569.090. 1. A person commits the crime of tampering in the second degree if he or she:

(1) Tampers with property of another for the purpose of causing substantial inconvenience to that person or to another.

  1. Tampering in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor unless:

(1) Committed as a second or subsequent violation of subdivision (4) of subsection 1, in which case it is a class D felony;

(2) The defendant has a prior conviction or has had a prior finding of guilt pursuant to paragraph (a) of subdivision (3) of subsection 3 of section 570.030, RSMo, section 570.080, RSMo, or subdivision (2) of subsection 1 of this section, in which case it is a class C felony.


  1. The First Round of Criminal Acts:
  2. CPC 502 Violation (Count 1) and 18 USC 1030 (Count 1):  On, or about February 8th, 2006, the group calling itself Spamhaus added 12,000 IP addresses of the clients (ALL of their clients) of a server company called Wholesale Internet, based in Kansas City, Missouri,  to their “blocklist” for the purpose of extorting some specific actions from Wholesale Internet – specifically, the removal from Wholesale Internet’s servers, of eight (8) lawfully operating US businesses.  I was one of those.
  3. 30.   The other seven businesses, according to the owners of Wholesale Internet, were all “Can-Spam compliant” email marketers, and I was a non-commercial email newsletter.  My server at Wholesale Internet was part of my lawfully created computer data and computer systems,” which began in California, was controlled from California, and reported back to my California system.   This action by Spamhaus violates CPC 502 (c)(5).
  4. 31.   MRS Violation Chapter 569.097 (Counts 1 through 12,000) On, or about February 8th, 2006, the group calling itself Spamhaus added 12,000 IP addresses of the clients (ALL of their clients) of a server company called Wholesale Internet, based in Kansas City, Missouri,  to their “blocklist” for the purpose of extorting some specific actions from Wholesale Internet – specifically, the removal from Wholesale Internet’s servers, of eight (8) lawfully operating US businesses.  I was one of those.
  5. 32.   The other seven businesses, according to the owners of Wholesale Internet, were all “Can-Spam compliant” email marketers, and I was a non-commercial email newsletter.  My server, in Missouri, at Wholesale Internet was part of my lawfully created computer data and computer systems,” which began in California, was controlled from California, and reported back to my California system.  The System, in fact, begins on my desk.  This action by Spamhaus violates MRS Chapter 569.097.
  6. MRS Violation Chapter 569.090 (Counts 12,001 through 24,001) On, or about February 8th, 2006, the group calling itself Spamhaus added 12,000 IP addresses of the clients (ALL of their clients) of a server company called Wholesale Internet, based in Kansas City, Missouri,  to their “blocklist” for the purpose of extorting some specific actions from Wholesale Internet – specifically, the removal from Wholesale Internet’s servers, of eight (8) lawfully operating US businesses.  I was one of those.  This action by Spamhaus violates MRS Chapter 569.090.
  7. CPC 502 Violation (Count 2) On, or about February 10th, 2006, the group calling itself Spamhaus, through their representative “HH” re-listed me, after my complaint to them, on their “blocklists,” and announced to the world, in sheer “malice”  that I was, in their words “a fruitcake.”  They said:

patrick timothy bolen – healthcare-alliance.com

Fruitcakes get a bad rap. Being a fruitcake is all very well, as is telling people about it, and even being given as an unsolicited gift at Christmas time is okay.

However, unsolicited email to get people to read your fruitcake recipies is not acceptable. Opt-OUT is not an option, not even for fruit.

  1. They then, out of sheer “malice” added links to my political opposites, as follows:

Choose which one to believe. Exercise jurisprudence when doing so.


  1. This “blocking” caused an unknown percentage of my subscribers (we think about 20%) NOT to receive my newsletter – as their customer ISPs, not knowing of Spamhaus’s fraudulent statements, blocked my broadcast IP addresses. This action by Spamhaus violates CPC 502 (c)(5). and (8).
  2. CPC 502 Violations (Count 3 through 13) On, or about February 10th, February 23, March 9th, March 24th, April 17th, May 1st, May 22nd, May 31st, June 4th,  June 8th,  and June 27th, 2006 the group calling itself Spamhaus continued to operate, despite demands and warnings, an illegal “blocklist “ of my email broadcast IP addresses – falsely informing their ISP customers that I was a “criminal spammer.”  Each “blocking” of my broadcasts increased our broadcast time, from a normal seven hours to 20 hours, using up our lawful computer services in violation of CPC 502 (c) (3) and (5). In addition, about 20% of our total subscriber base was blocked – so, each time, about 57,000 of our lawful subscribers were not receiving their newsletters.  We had many complaints.  This action by Spamhaus violates CPC 502 (c)(3)and (5).
  3. CPC 502 Violations (Counts14 through 627,013) –  As noted above, approximately 57,000 (or more) of our subscribers were denied their lawful newsletter each time the broadcast went out, due to Spamhaus’s illegal “blocking,” not allowing us to connect with our lawful subscribers, each time.  There were eleven broadcasts during this period for a total of 627,000 individual violations of CPC 502 section (c)(5).
  4. Between the Rounds of Criminal Acts:
  5. Having no success at convincing Spamhaus, and its volunteers to leave me alone,  I decided to gather information for a legal action against Spamhaus, and those volunteers in California.  To accomplish this I entered the discussion on the NANAE newsgroup, asking for information on Spamhaus’s alleged “volunteers,” etc.  I received over a thousand responses, a significant number of which any reasonable person would have to conclude were “hate mail.”  More importantly  I received promises and threats of additional actions against my interests – clearly in retaliation for my request for information.
  6. CPC 502 Violation (Counts 627,014 through 628,614) – On, or about, July 14th, 2006, my Internet Service provider Black Lotus Communications was notified by its provider Staminus Communications that my account was to be turned off by the end of the month.  The SPEWS segment of the Spamhaus/SPEWS conspiracy had blocked all 1,600 of Staminus’s customers email IPs demanding that Staminus not only shut down my service, but that Staminus destroy my websites, and my data, as a condition of removing the email blocks. these “blocks” prevented Staminus’s customers from accessing emails all around the world. These 1,600 acts by Spamhaus/SPEWS are each a violation of CPC 502 section (c)(5).
  7. CPC 502 Violation (Counts 628,614 through 628,615) – On, or about, July 14th, 2006, my Internet Service provider Black Lotus Communications was notified by its provider Staminus Communications that my account was to be turned off by the end of the month.  The SPEWS segment of the Spamhaus/SPEWS conspiracy had blocked all 1,600 of Staminus’s customers email IPs demanding that Staminus not only shut down my service, but that Staminus destroy my websites, and my data, as a condition of removing the email blocks. these “blocks” prevented Staminus’s customers from accessing emails all around the world.  Staminus immediately limited my server activity, and shut me down as of July 26th, 2006.  This act by SPEWS is a violation of CPC 502 section (c)(5).
  8. Spamhaus/SPEWS – the Ku Klux Klan of the Internet – The most important facet of the Spamhaus/SPEWS conspiracy is their use of anonymity as a tool to create fear in those they intend to dominate.  I believe that there is little, or no, difference between the tactics employed by the Spamhaus/SPEWS “vigilantes,” and the infamous North American Ku Klux Klan.  In both cases, the intent is, and was, to dominate by fear.
  9. In the heydays of the Klan an innocent family, who happened to be of color, religion, race, or political belief (something different from the Klan members) would suddenly, in the middle of the night, be confronted in their home with gunfire, a burning cross in their yard, and a group of screaming individuals covered in white-sheets-with-eyeholes.  The family would be dragged out into the yard, the women raped, the men cut up, and their remains hung from a tree – all, supposedly, because the family had, somehow, broken some “unwritten law” this group of vigilantes wanted enforced.
  10. It is exactly the same situation with the Spamhaus/SPEWS vigilante conspiracy.  The anonymity provided by “fake” email addresses has enabled the exact same type of behavior by the “vigilantes.” The white-sheets-with-eyeholes, the anonymity, has created a whole new class of criminal behavior on the internet.  This anonymity is the basis for the anti-spammer vigilante operation, attempting to enforce their own “unwritten laws.”
  11. The best singular example of the operation of the combined Spamhaus/SPEWS criminal conspiracy is to examine the process that SPEWS uses to harass its victims.  First, no one knows who SPEWS actually is, nor who its members are, nor who they represent.  Everything about it is hidden, including location of its offices, names of its directors and employees, location of its website, and who funds it.  Worse, when SPEWS lists a victim on its blacklist there is no way to contact SPEWS, no place for an attorney to send a certified letter demanding removal.  More, SPEWS will NOT communicate directly with a victim. The only contact is for the victim’s ISP to go on one, or both, of those google news groups (NANAE, or NANABl) and ask to be removed from the blacklist.  The members of those groups use “fake”internet email addresses (white-sheets-with-eyeholes) to communicate with the ISP victim, then using foul language, suggestions of odd sexual activity, and any number of ugly, improper techniques to create fear.
  12. In the case, my case, of SPEWS attacking Staminus to get them to turn me off (criminal extortion), Staminus had a real fear of losing all, or most, of their 1,600 customers, because SPEWS was blocking each, and every, of Staminus’s customer IP addresses, and falsely stating to those customers, that Staminus was hosting a“criminal spammer.”  Staminus, a small provider, was in mortal danger of going bankrupt, and losing their entire business to a group who, in essence, is the internet equivalent of the KU Klux Klan.  During the process where Staminus was communicating with SPEWS via the NANABl news list, SPEWS members were demanding that Staminus itself, commit a criminal felony as a condition of having the blacklist removed.  SPEWS was demanding that Staminus destroy my websites, and my information.  I was watching this email exchange, and when this demand was made I immediately demanded the identity of the SPEWS representatives, but was refused admission to the discussion and referred to two other websites described as “the rules.” Both of those websites were owned, and controlled, by Scott Hazen Mueller, the Board Chairman of CAUCE (Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial Email), and a Systems Administrator at Cal State Northridge.
  13. Spamhaus’s method of dealing with complainants is to deter them with a claim that they are based in the UK, and that if a legal action is filed it has to be filed there in the UK, and that the complainant would have to put up all of the money for Spamhaus’s defense into the equivalent of an “escrow account.
  14. Spamhaus and SPEWS, although claiming to be separate, I believe, are the same group of people.  There is good reason to suspect that the Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial Email (CAUCE), or certain of its leadership, may be part of the same criminal conspiracy.
  15. The intent of the Spamhaus/SPEWS criminal conspiracy is far more ominous than the Ku Klux Klan ever thought to be, for there is a second, and even more important reason for the “anonymity” – the personal business interests of the “vigilantes.” The intent of the conspiracy is simple – complete control over who gets to say what, to who, on the internet,   They want complete, and total, control over internet email broadcasting.  Their campaigns, and their actions against their victims, makes that clear.
  16. In the Spamhaus/SPEWS conspiracy there are two targets:  (1)  “Free speech” groups – Spamhaus/SPEWS wants to be able to control what information is available to the public, and (2) small internet e-marketing companies that compete with the Spamhaus/SPEWS conspiracy’s secret members’ own business interests.
  17. Right from the beginning of my investigation I found that the primary players in the Spamhaus/SPEWS conspiracy all had connections, or ownership, of supposedly “approved” e-marketing operations – and that the victim targets they were shutting down, or forcing to be shut down, represented competition to those business interests.
  18. Summary of Criminal Activity – In essence, the Spamhaus/SPEWS conspiracy has committed, in the issues surrounding their attack on me, 628,615 individual violations of State of California Penal Code Section 502 (c) (3), (5) (Computer Crimes) and 518-524 (Extortion), 24,001 individual violations of Missouri “tampering”crimes –  569.090(1) (Tampering) and 569.097 (Tampering with computer equipment), and a smorgasbord of Federal violations including violation(s) of title 18, United States Code Sections  241 (Conspiracy against rights), 371 (Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States), 875(d) (Interstate communications), 1030(Fraud and related activity in relation to a computer), 1343 (fraud by wire, radio, or television), 1951 (Interference with commerce by threats or violence), 1952(Interstate and foreign travel or transportation in aid of racketeering enterprises).
  19. More, the Spamhaus/SPEWS vigilantes have so damaged my reputation that when I complained to a Colorado State University Department head about the activities, on University time and using University facilities, of one of the SPEWS leaders (who calls himself “Some Bastard,” ) I traced, his response was:

Mr. Bolen – I can not take you seriously as your poor reputation, well publicized on the internet, precedes you.

  1. “Some Bastard” was the Spamhaus/SPEWS representative who demanded that my ISP destroy my websites and all my data as a condition of having the SPEWS blocklist against all of their 1,600 customers lifted.
  2. Worse, my newsletter is just one of thousands of annual victims of the Spamhaus/SPEWS conspiracy in the United States, alone.


Tim Bolen – Consumer Advocate

Will California Destroy Aetna Insurance?…

Will the California legislature destroy Aetna insurance?  Probably.  It’s in the works.

Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen

SB 840 (Senate Bill 840), a proposal to destroy ALL health insurance providers within California, and replace them with a State run system has already passed the California Senate with a vote of 25 to 15.  The measure is headed for the California House where it will come up for a vote in November of this year.

Shocked?  I’m not.

The health insurance industry brought this on themselves.  Frankly, they deserve to get shut down.  They are a pall on America.  They, in a macrocosm, represent EVERYTHING wrong with health care in the US.  The US, according to the World Health Organization (WHO) ranks seventy-second (72) in health care, with countries like Morocco, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, etc., rating higher in quality.  But, of course, the US ranks #1 (Number one) in health care costs.  Continue reading Will California Destroy Aetna Insurance?…

Aetna Insurance: Will the “Cavitat” Case Take The Company Down?…

The American medical system is broken. And, it isn’t worth fixing. Americans know that, and perhaps, without conscious thought, are abandoning it for “alternatives,” in droves.

Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen

The National Science Foundation, a few years ago, issued a report that shocked the medical industry. It said, simply, that 88% of adult Americans believed in, and used, some form of “alternative” to medicine. As early as 1998 reports showed that half of the total US health dollar was being spent on “alternatives.” Even more shocking to industry was the fact that, not only were Americans using those “alternatives,” but they were paying for them out-of pocket – because neither insurance, nor Medicare, would pay for them. Americans bought them anyway.

Obviously, there is a paradigm shift happening. Thank God for that. Continue reading Aetna Insurance: Will the “Cavitat” Case Take The Company Down?…


New Ruling Would Put Admitted Amalgam Hazard into“Case Law”

By Leo Cashman


After a six-year journey through the court system, the case of Dr. David Barnes, DDS v. Kerr Corporation, the nation’s largest amalgam manufacturer, appears to be a sad defeat: the trial court granted Kerr’s motion for summary judgment, and this ruling was recently affirmed by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. While our sympathies go out to Dr. David E. Barnes, the Tennessee dentist who had been injured by his daily occupational exposure to amalgam/mercury, there appears to be a silver lining: the federal appellate court recognized the dangers of mercury amalgams and declared that the manufacturer provided a clear and unqualified warning that its product – amalgam – is very dangerous! The appellate court’s opinion is recommended for publication, which would make the decision binding legal precedent.  The potential consequences of this ruling are fascinating.

Barnes, who used mercury amalgam fillings for the first ten years of his practice, alleged that he had been poisoned by the mercury in the amalgam fillings that he placed and removed on a daily basis.  In 1999, Dr Barnes brought a products liability case against Kerr Corporation, the manufacturer of the only amalgam products Barnes ever purchased.  Barnes retained Jim Love and Robert Reeves, attorneys most knowledgeable about mercury amalgams, to represent him. Dr. Mark Richardson, PhD, F.L. Lorscheider, Ph.D., Gary Ordog, M.D., Robert Granacher, M.D., George Colpitts, D.D.S., and other expert witnesses testified on Dr. Barnes’s behalf concerning the various scientific, medical, and dental issues that arose in the case. Kerr challenged the admissibility of Dr. Barnes’s scientific and medical testimony on the basis that it was not supported by valid and reliable published science.  However, the trial court ruled that the supporting science was valid and reliable and overruled Kerr’s motion.

Kerr filed an ensuing motion for summary judgment claiming that its warnings were adequate as a matter of law.  Kerr also argued that the vast majority of Barnes’s exposure was not attributable to Kerr’s products, but to amalgam fillings that Barnes removed.  Because the appearance of an amalgam filling will not reveal the filling’s manufacturer, Kerr argued that Barnes could not prove that Kerr’s products actually injured Barnes.  The District Court granted Kerr’s motion.  The judgment was appealed to the 6th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, but on August 11th, 2005, the Court of Appeals upheld the District Court’s ruling.

If the Sixth Circuit Court’s opinion is published, Barnes v. Kerr may profoundly change the legal landscape regarding amalgam.  Barnes argued that Kerr’s warnings addressed only mercury—not mixed dental amalgam.  Barnes admitted that he was aware of mercury’s toxicity, but testified that in dental school, he was taught that mixed dental amalgam was safe and the mercury rendered inert.  However, the Sixth Circuit’s opinion held that the warning sufficiently notified Barnes that mixed dental amalgam was dangerous.  The Court noted, “the label on each jar of dental amalgam capsules featured not only a skull and crossbones next to the word “Poison,” but also a list of illnesses, including “bronchiiolitis, pneumonitis, pulmonary edema [and] redness and irritation to [the] eyes and skin.” Likewise, the Court noted, the MSDS (material safety data sheet,  provided to all dentist buyers) warned that chronic mercury exposure could lead to “nervous irritability, weakness, tremors, gingivitis, erethism and graying of the lens of the eye.” Further, the Court ruled that the other ingredients mixed in amalgam with the mercury – silver, copper and tin – are not claimed by the manufacturer to “neutralize the danger while the dentist is working with the product.”

Attorney Jim Love filed a petition for rehearing en banc, which requests a rehearing before all of the judges sitting on the Sixth Circuit Court.  Such a remedy is normally disfavored.  If the ruling stands as written, it will become legal precedent.  The consequences of this ruling may include the following:

1)      Under the “learned intermediary” doctrine, dentists are obligated to pass along manufacturer’s warnings to their patients.  In light of the ruling in Barnes v. Kerr, dentists will be required to explain to their patients the dangers acknowledged in Kerr’s warnings.

2)      Arguably, state dental boards will no longer be able to prohibit dentists from communicating the dangers of mercury amalgam to their patients.

3)      In order for a dentist to obtain a patient’s informed consent, the information given to a patient concerning amalgam will change very dramatically.

4)      The Court’s opinion will provide a direct challenge to the ADA’s proclamations of amalgam safety.

5)      In formulating a successful legal strategy, Kerr may have impaired the market for its dental amalgam product.

Hulda Clark letter to US Attorney

Carol C. Lam

United States Attorney for the Southern District of California

Federal Office Building
880 Front Street, Room 6293
San Diego, California 92101-8893+

Via FAX – 619-557-5749

Tuesday, April 14, 2004


It has been brought to my attention that there is an investigation going on, conducted by your office, with the possibility of further investigation by the San Diego Federal Grand Jury, concerning my activities.  The prosecutor assigned to this case is, I believe, Melanie Pierson. There is the suggestion, in the investigation, that my work is somehow a “fraud” designed to sell health products.

For your office to suggest that my life’s work is fraud is beyond comprehension. My research investigations are an open book. In fact, there are FIVE open books.  I have achieved significant results in determining the causes of chronic disease, including cancer, AIDS, and other diseases.  In fact, I have tried hard to put the ideas in my books in the public domain. This includes patentable materials worth considerable revenues. This “public domain” approach is seldom used but worthy of my training and religious heritage. I know that my contribution will benefit the USA and all of society immeasurably.

With this letter, I am inviting you to visit me, and view my work at the medical facility known as “Century Nutrition” in Tijuana, Mexico on a date of your choosing..  Several patients of the facility will be available for interview between 10 and 4.at that time.

I am an independent research scientist, and author of five books, sold in many different languages, concerned with, and offering theories about, the current health crisis, and dilemmas, in the North American Health Care System.  My writings are controversial in American society, and have been both highly praised in one sector, and have raised the hackles of certain members of the conventional medical system.

The controversy over my books is centered on several ideas.  (1)  I believe that the medical system needs to move away from the “treatment” modality into finding “cures” for health problems.  To me, “treatment” deals with managing symptoms, and “cures” deal with determining, and removing, the “causes” of problems.  Four of my books are built on this idea – “The Cure for Advanced Cancer, The Cure for All Cancers, The Cure for All Diseases, The Cure for HIV/AIDS.”  Each of these books expounds on the idea that the cause, or source, of the problem must be found and eliminated.  Such a process has the definition of a “cure” not a “treatment,” because it is scientifically correct.  (2)  I believe in “self health.”  My books are written to educate and instruct the general public about how the human body functions, and how to deal with daily activities, including crises.  I point out, as Native Americans have for centuries, that we, as humans, are interdependent with our environment.  I show people how to manage that interdependence.  (3)  I have invented a testing device, still in manual operation stages, which I call a Syncrometer, that assists me in finding certain elements, at specific locations in the human body, which may be related to the “cause” of problems.  I teach the general public how to make, and use, this device, and encourage improvements.  (4)  I have invented a device, still in exploratory stages, which I call the Zapper. I teach the general public how to make, and use, this device, and encourage improvements.  (5)  I have created the new science of Homeography, which is the electronic analog of homeopathy.  I teach this also.  The results can be quite astounding.

As you know, the health system in the USA is being challenged on new frontiers and my training in both Biology and Radio Technology has given me a unique advantage I would like to pass on to others, who can be interested. My findings and my success rates are phenomenal. In fact those findings open more than one new horizon in both biology and technology. I work every day to find answers to our health dilemmas. I have devoted my life to this cause because my background and education is unique, giving me this responsibility.

To hear with your own ears, and see with your own eyes, what I do and to talk to the patients who are currently present at Century Nutrition for treatment, I cordially invite you to visit us. We are just a few blocks from the border, within walking distance.

Any Monday, Wednesday, or Friday would be a suitable day, since these are patient days.I will write a Memo on Tuesday to all the patients about this. You are welcome to bring media with you.  Our Doctor (M.D.) will be available so you can see every aspect of our treatment and testing. Maybe it will fascinate you, as it does us, to see the Syncrometer at work, our doctor’s Homeopathy skills, as well as my homeography, and electronic counterparts to bring about permanent cures, never before seen.

May I have the pleasure of your visit? The patients will be in the lobby, giving you free access.  I look forward to our meeting.,

Best Regards

Hulda Regehr Clark, PhD

Century Nutrition

Tijuana, Mexico



cc:  Melanie Pierson