I have written a series of articles on who and what the “skeptics” (pseudo-skeptics) actually are. The articles are not flattering, for there is nothing good about the skeptic organization. Hence, there is nothing good about individual skeptics.
Nothing at all. They are all about “hate.”
The best example of the reality of the skeptics is the one explained in my The “Skeptics” Are An Organized “Hate Group”… article about their October 2012 campaign to stop the Australian Vaccination Network and its leader Meryl Dorey. You can read the whole article by clicking on the article title (in red) above. See an excerpt, below, of my article, on what they did:
“The rape, mutilation and death threats against Meryl Dorey, President of the Australian Vaccination Network. (AVN) make a very clear statement about the reality of the international “skeptic” organization. The activities of Australian Skeptics, with their Stop the AVN subsidiary attacks, took the lid of off their formally secret plans.
Tracing the Die in a Fire” and “Just burn” phone calls back to top Australian skeptic leader, shoe salesman Daniel Rafaelle, the Stop the AVN head’s home telephone, brought everything out into the open. Remember, the Australian Skeptics, at their own “Amazing meeting” in 2010, gave Rafaelle their Top Award for his activities against Meryl Dorey and the AVN.
Nice people, huh?
The Skeptics evolved from an earlier group calling itself the “Quackbusters” who were almost completely destroyed by elements of the North American Health Freedom Movement.
There are quite a few articles below – all in reverse chronological order.
Are We Sick of The Threats, Lies and Misdirection?
Opinion by “Deplorable” Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen
The photo at the top of this article is indeed worth a thousand words, for it explains a lot about WHO, and WHAT, attacked “Vaxxed” producer Del BigTree.
Let’s explore that WHO, and WHAT. Yes, the attack was easily repulsed THIS TIME, and yes, there will be a reckoning. For it is time for a reckoning.
For as long as I can remember there has been a version of the current “Skeptic” organization operating in North America. Each time they appear, so to speak, they have been beaten, and shoved back into the septic tank with the lid closed tightly, right where they belong.
The earlier version of the current “Skeptic” organization was called the “Quackbusters.” They were led by Stephen Barrett of the infamous quackwatch.com scenario. It took a while to crush him and them, but, in fact, crush them we did – lawsuits, traps, media campaigns, you-name-it-we-did-it operations designed to rid the North American health care world of a cockroach infestation.
What is consistent in the “Skeptic” and the “Quackbuster” worlds is the “quality” of the people that run them.
In my earlier article on the attack I showed you another important photograph, reprinted just below. It shows some VERY important things about “skeptic leadership.” Let’s look at it again:
Opinion by “Deplorable” Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen
The North American Anti-Vaccination movement is huge – growing larger by the minute – and unstoppable.
But to Big Pharma that fact hasn’t sunk in just yet, and they still send their minions, like the “skeptics,” into the fray attempting to disrupt us. It is all working against them. Big Pharma is getting battered, and “the handwriting is on the wall…”
The Anti-Vaccination movement is everywhere. You can’t turn in any direction and not find our efforts, and effects. I could write ten pages of words right here, and still not even OUTLINE the number of anti-vax warrior groups out here working, right this minute.
One of the more obvious groups is the “Vaxxed” Team. They are virtually EVERYWHERE. And, their message is pervasive.
We also know that when we talk about “Medical Boards,” we’re really talking about the stalking horses for pharma. These are where the great battles are truly fought, among relatively small groups of people, having an enormous impact on the rest of us. The good things are killed in the dark, away from the prying eyes of the public.
From the work I did covering the Autism Omnibus Hearings, and my later work detailed in the book, INOCULATED: How Science Lost its Soul in Autism, it’s clear that if the CDC whistle-blower, Dr. William Thompson had just a little more courage, or if Dr. Frank De Stefano or the head of the CDC at that time, Dr. Julie Gerberding were really interested in public health, we would be living in a completely different world with much more hope for our children.
That’s why the recent news that Dr. Mark Geier, one of the truly courageous people involved in the Autism Omnibus Hearing who was unfairly sidelined, had won a $2.5 million dollar suit against the Maryland Board of Physicians, is so deeply satisfying.
As reported in The Washington Post, ““But the regulators who stripped Geier’s credentials are now in the hot seat, ordered to each personally pay tens of thousands of dollars in damages by a judge who says the board abused its power in an attempt to humiliate the doctor and his family.” (“Regulators Who Targeted Anti-Vaccine Doctor May Pay Million for Humiliating Him,” By Fenit Nirappil, The Washington Post, February 3, 2018)
That’s really got to annoy the “skeptics,” or the pharma-mafia cheiftans like Dr. Paul Offit or Tony Faucci. They never liked lawyers to begin with, which is why people like them spear-headed the removal of lawyers from vaccine liability with the passage of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.
But justice is slowly finding its way back. Just ask all those sexually harassing Congressmen who are suddenly deciding not to run for re-election because they want to “spend more time with their families.” If you believe that explanation I’ve got a story to tell you about the Easter Bunny laying candy eggs.
How hard did the judge slap the Maryland Board of Physicians?
“But Montgomery County Circuit Court Judge Ronald B. Rubin sided with the Geiers, awarding them $2.5 million in damages. He called the order a significant breach of medical privacy and accused the board and its staff of failing to preserve emails related to the case and pleading ignorance about the order on the witness stand.”
“If their testimony were to be believed, which the court does not, it is the worst case of collective amnesia in the history of the Maryland government and on par with the collective memory failure on display at the Watergate hearings,” Rubin wrote in a December opinion.
“He ordered 14 board appointees, the board’s lead attorney and the lead investigator on the Geier case to pay half of the damages out of their own pockets, between $10,000 and $200,000 apiece, depending on their net worth.”
Or, Are The “Skeptics” Manipulating Easily Tricked FaceBook Algorithms and Staff?
It Is Time We Did Something…
Opinion by “Deplorable” Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen
Everyone I know is complaining about FaceBook. It simply is NOT the same FaceBook we all knew and loved. It is NOT friendly any more. It is like living next to a bad neighbor that always, and in every way, finds fault.
The Anti-Vaxxer Community is HUGE, and it is spread all across Social Media. It makes up a very large portion of FaceBook society. There are so many separate groups discussing details of the dangers of vaccines, and the policies therein, it is mind-boggling.
So, why, we have to ask, would FaceBook be so dumb as to mess with that situation? Good question. But, they do.
Or do they?
Is FaceBook, itself, being manipulated?
Very possibly. We do know, for instance, that Wikipedia’s Health Care offering is a total loss – that it is COMPLETELY controlled by the ten-million-dollar-per-year-in-funding “skeptic” bag-of-losers menagerie. So, why wouldn’t they make a try for control of FaceBook?
Confidential sources tell me that, in fact, the “skeptics” ARE in the process of attempting to control FaceBook – and their “Plan of Action,” manipulating the FaceBook algorithm,has been described to me. I am told that those same “skeptics” have acquired the services of two HIGH LEVEL FaceBook engineers to help them with their nefarious plans. I have been shown proof of that. Anti-Vaxxers are paying attention.
Manipulating the FaceBook algorithm…
Yes, we all know there is a “liberal bent” to those working in Social Media. We also know that liberals, as a unit, DO NOT believe in the US First Amendment. They believe that Free Speech ONLY applies to them, used in a setting that ONLY THEY approve of – and to them that First amendment NEVER applies to anyone that disagrees with them. Look at Berkeley – the so-called “Liberal Bastion of Free Speech.”
Project Veritas, recently, released a blockbuster video DOCUMENTING the bragging of Twitter employees detailing the exact mechanisms they use to block Conservative messaging on Twitter – also claiming that FaceBook and Google were far better at blocking those Conservatives.
You will find Social Media engineers at Twitter bragging about how they control online content. As Project Veritas’s James O’Keefe says of Twitter in the video…
“Its culture behind closed doors is one of blatant censorship, systematic bias, and political targeting. While many suspected this was the case, today we present the proof, out of their own Twitter mouths…”
This video clearly shows how “Insiders”at a Social Media can manipulate the system according to their own bias…
But, can “Outsiders” Manipulate the FaceBook algorithm?
There are training sessions on how to do exactly that…
It’s not the differences with your allies which should worry you, but the DESTRUCTION your common enemy has planned for everybody who is even remotely on your side.
With the establishment on Thursday of the Conscience and Religious Freedom Division in the Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Civil Rights, Trump has laid the groundwork to smash every single vaccine mandate as well as turn BIG PHARMA into little pharma.
Don’t think this new division of Conscience and Religious Freedom at HHS is a big deal?
THINK AGAIN. It gives many different groups a BIG TENT under which to fight. I think it is time that Christians and Libertarians, and people of other religious faiths realize that we have a COMMON INTEREST in fighting against a FASCIST HEALTH ESTABLISHMENT.
Yes, we should protect Catholic nuns who don’t want to buy an insurance plan that provides for birth control. And we should protect nurses who don’t want to take part in abortions. And we should protect those who do not want vaccines with aborted human tissue injected into their children, Muslims and Orthodox Jews who do not want vaccines with pig products, vegans who do not want vaccines made with ANY animal products, or the conscientious parent who does their own research and comes to the conclusion that ALL VACCINES ARE A REALLY BAD IDEA.
Is it clear by this time I believe all of you are capable of coming to your own conclusions about vaccines? I have my own opinion and I am happy to share, but I will not impose my will upon any other person.
It is with a heavy heart I must challenge Bill Nye, “the Science Guy”once one of my idols, to a debate regarding his dangerous views on genetically modified foods (GMOs) and vaccines. I fear Nye has trespassed against the gods of science and the souls of Aristotle, Galileo, and Darwin cry out from their graves for me to rescue him from his error.
This is what I have on the wall of my science classroom:
Science means I will be faithful to the cause of free inquiry, and will accept truth where I find it, no matter how relentlessly it may tear out the roots of prejudice and superstition. I will not be blinded by the new or spectacular, condemning the old and tried, simply because it is old and tried. I will not distort or weigh evidence to support a favored theory, suspending judgment for more nearly adequate evidence. This I pledge as an ideal of Science.
Now when I look at Nye’s views on GMOs it seems as if he simply gets overwhelmed with the new and spectacular, rather than thinking through the wisdom of the effort.
In explaining why he changed his view on GMOs, here’s an example of his thinking from a July 13, 2015 Business Insider article. “He explained that what changed his mind was a fateful visit to the lab [a Monsanto lab] where scientists do the actual gene modification. There, he watched them scan the entire genetic sequence of the crops they wanted to modify. The process he saw, was startlingly precise, far more than it had been 20 years ago.”
The process may be precise, Bill, but you still have no idea what effect it will have on living organisms.
I draw your attention to research published in the journal, Environmental Science Europe in 2014 on genetically modified corn and the pesticide Round-Up, on toxicity in rats. This research was viciously attacked by Monsanto, especially since it represented a financial risk to their company’s efforts.
“Biochemical analyses confirmed very significant chronic kidney deficiencies, for all treatments and both sexes; 76% of the altered parameters were kidney-related. In treated males, liver congestions and necrosis were 2.5 to 5.5 times higher. Marked and severe neuropathies were also generally 1.3 to 2.3 times greater. In females, all treatment groups showed a two-to-threefold increase in mortality and deaths were earlier. This difference was also evident in three male groups fed with GM maize.”
The takeaway is that feeding rats genetically modified corn, which is then treated with the pesticide Round-Up, is causing kidney problems, liver issues, neuropathies (nerve death), and decreased life span. Yes, it’s cool that you can splice genes into organisms that could not have done so before, but maybe there’s a reason nature doesn’t do it on her own.
And maybe this is just from my legal training, Bill, but maybe you shouldn’t be so trusting of research which is funded by the people trying to sell you the product?
I also struggle with Nye’s flawed reasoning when it comes to vaccines. I found an article entitled “5 Things Bill Nye Has to Say to Anti-Vaxxers,” from The Record, May 8, 2017.
On Friday, October 13, 2017, I sat in a movie theater in San Francisco and watched Miranda Bailey’s remarkable new documentary about Dr. Andrew Wakefield, entitled, “The Pathological Optimist.”
I viewed the film with a conflicting mix of emotions…
As an advocate on the vaccine issue for the past fifteen years it has become clear to me that the powers that be do not want this subject to be debated by the public, even if that simply means twelve average citizens sitting in a jury box.
The global vaccine market is projected to reach near fifty billion dollars a year by 2022 and there is NO meaningful oversight. The game is going too well for the pharmaceutical industry and their supporters for any real questions to be asked.
They have paid off our politicians, bribed the media, neutered our legal system, and through some kind of dark magic have kept the public at large from asking the very simple question of why we have the sickest generation of kids in history.
In short, I consider any attempt to use the legal system for justice on this issue to be a fool’s errand. And yet at the same time I want to believe that some attempt at getting the truth through our legal system will eventually succeed.
As I watched Dr. Wakefield try time and time again to get his case heard…
First when his co-author, Dr. John Walker-Smith (with whom he was convicted) was exonerated, and second, in a defamation action against the British Medical Journal and hack writer, Brian Deer, I knew well in advance what the final disappointing result would be.
The case in front of the British Medical Council was impossible to bring because Wakefield’s legal insurance would not pay for the cost of the appeal, even though they had done so for Dr. John Walker-Smith.
The defamation case was dismissed on the grounds that the state of Texas did not have jurisdiction. That mean not a single piece of evidence was ever heard in either of the cases. Why am I not surprised?
However, like Andrew Wakefield, I am also a pathological optimist. I know that someday in the future this battle will be a distant memory, and I will be one of those old men who tell the young stories of those who fought and triumphed. The war for the future of humanity will be won.
I am the world’s #1 anti-vaxxer. Seriously, I deserve the title. Who else has come up with an idea for a FIVE YEAR MORATORIUM ON CHILDHOOD VACCINES as well as a plan for the COMPLETE DESTRUCTION OF PHARMA CONTROL OF MEDIA?
Who else has been as relentless in promoting the idea that one of the MAIN REASONS FOR THE FAILURE of our movement, has been the HIGH PROFILE PARENTS OF VACCINE-INJURED CHILDREN who REMAIN SILENT?
I will NOT be quiet…
I know that makes some people angry, but I want our community to ROAR LIKE LIONS, rather than COWER LIKE MICE. It’s just the future of the human race at stake.
It’s also your eternal soul you have to worry about when you die one day and face God and He asks what YOU DID TO STOP THE SLAUGHTER AND MAIMING OF THE INNOCENTS.
Who else has been as diligent in documenting the corruption of the very soul of science as shown in my books, PLAGUE and INOCULATED? If you have any question about why our species is barreling toward extinction, then you need to read these books.
Oskar Schindler saved about 1,200 Jews from the Nazis in World War II and Steven Spielberg made an Academy Award winning film about him.
My ambitions are much greater.
My five year moratorium on childhood vaccines (especially with the changes I’ve suggested to be implemented in those five years) mean that CONSERVATIVELY I WILL BE SAVING 250,000 CHILDREN FROM AUTISM AND 15,000 BABIES FROM SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME.
I really do have to stress that this is a CONSERVATIVE ESTIMATE. The true effects are likely to be MUCH GREATER.
When you look at the numbers for the numbers of children diagnosed with autism you get a lot of variation in the numbers. 50,000 a year is a conservative estimate. It’s likely to be much higher.
That’s not counting all the kids with ADHD, sensory processing disorder, and all of the other associated learning problems I believe should be laid at the feet of vaccines.
It’s estimated that the cost of raising a child with autism is about three million dollars, a good deal of it paid for by the government, insurance, or borne by the families. Let’s look at just the lost opportunity costs. 250,000 kids and each one costing $3,000,000, that’s a savings of $750 BILLION DOLLARS.
“Dr. Brenda Fitzgerald is said to be deep in discussions to lead the sprawling agency, according to sources who requested anonymity to discuss confidential details. They stressed the negotiations were not finalized and that several administrative hurdles remained before an official announcement is made.
Fitzgerald would succeed Dr. Anne Schuchat, who became the CDC’s acting director in January 2017 after Dr. Tom Frieden resigned. The role is one of the most prominent in public health and in metro Atlanta: The CDC has thousands of employees and several campuses across the city.
Trained as an obstetrician-gynecologist, Fitzgerald has served as the commissioner of Georgia’s public health department since her 2011 appointment by Gov. Nathan Deal and oversees a range of health programs, including the state’s emergency medical response and infectious disease and immunization initiatives.
Fitzgerald did not respond to requests for comment.
Big Pharma’s“Skeptic”zealots fell all over themselves in glee, screaming across the internet how pro-vaccine Fitzgerald is/was…
Yup, on the Georgia Health Department website it sure appears that way.
But, as usual, the “skeptics” didn’t do their homework…
“Throughout their professional relationship, Lipkin made clear that he expected Plaintiff to be his largely-silent and always subservient partner, forced to work almost exclusively on his projects and to give him undue credit for her own work, to the detriment of her own professional growth, stature in their shared field, and productivity.”
That’s why my approach was always to ask questions, listen to the answers, and act as if I totally got what they were saying. You’ve probably seen the same act on pretty much every cop show.
But what I was REALLY doing was seeing how they answered the questions.
You see, among lawyers, the LOGICAL presumption is that if you catch them lying about ONE THING, you’re probably going to catch them LYING about a LOT of other things.
If you catch them acting ABNORMAL OR CORRUPTLY in one circumstance, you have a window into how they’re likely to act in similar circumstances.
On the night of September 19, 2013 I spent time with Ian Lipkin and Mady Hornig at a small cocktail party in Manhattan.
I knew who they were and they knew who I was. I had HOPED that there was the possibility of making movement in answering important questions about chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and autism.
In light of Mady Hornig’s lawsuit against Ian Lipkin and Columbia University, it is interesting to review my visit with the two of them.
I have ALWAYS believed that if my enemies want to end this war, I will be happy to go the extra mile for peace and truth. Some of my fellow autism activists thought it was a fool’s errand. But I always like to get an up-close look at my enemy. Sometimes I will discover I have misjudged them. Other times I will realize that there is no way we can be allies and that there is only ONE Way all of this will end.
I give you the account of my night with Ian Lipkin and Mady Hornig as detailed in my book, INOCULATED: How Science Lost its Soul in Autism.
“I must confess that I was nervous as I dressed in my New York hotel room for what was billed as a “Cocktail Reception to Celebrate the Work of The Center for Infection and Immunity Featuring W, Ian Lipkin, M.D., Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health – Hosted by Emanuel Stern at the SoHo Grand Hotel, 310 West Broadway, New York City.” I couldn’t help but feel like some barbarian tribal leader, summoned by Caesar to Rome for an audience. I dressed in black and when I looked at myself in the mirror thought I looked a little like Luke Skywalker in Return of the Jedi, surrendering myself to Darth Vader to be taken to the Death Star. I mean, isn’t that what heroes are supposed to do? Venture into the very lair of the enemy? Luke at the Death Star? Frodo and Sam at Mount Doom?
I took a cab to the SoHo Grand Hotel, entered the lobby, got directions to where the event was being held, and made my way to the location. I opened the doors, expecting to see some grand ballroom, but instead saw a cramped little space with six to seven tables, a buffet and drink table set up at the back with folders on the work of the center, along with some cute little blue plastic circular hand sanitizers emblazoned with the crest of the Center for Infection and Immunity as well as a line drawing of a microscope, and a podium with microphone at the front for the speakers. There were maybe thirty people in the room. I’d seen bigger crowds at a PTA meeting. “This is the grand citadel of science?” I thought to myself.
Looking around the room I quickly identified Mady Hornig. She is an attractive woman, with a lean, angular face, surrounded by ringlets of dark hair. I made my way over to her and introduced myself.
She smiled broadly, cocked her head a little to the side, and extended a hand. “Kent! It’s so nice to finally meet you!”
“Really?” I asked, with a laugh. “It’s nice to meet me?”
“Yes. Why not?”
“Well, I’ve written articles which have criticized some of your research.”
“Were they mean? Or rude?”
“I don’t think so. I didn’t make it personal.”
“Then we don’t have a problem.”
“Okay, Mady, I’ve got a question I wanted to ask you for years.”
I paused for a moment and she gave me a look which seemed to say, “Proceed.”
“I consider your article, ‘The Neurotoxic Effects of Thimerosal are Mouse Strain Dependent’ to be one of the most important papers in autism. But you published that in 2004 and now it’s 2013. Why no other papers?”
She rolled her eyes and said, “You don’t know?”
She proceeded to tell me that after the publication of her paper, a blogger named Autism Diva had published many articles criticizing her work, referring to it as the “Rain Mouse” experiments[i] and it had caused her a great deal of difficulty with the Columbia administration. “I felt like I was under probation for like five years after that paper came out.”
“Did this Autism Diva person have any academic credentials that would make the administration sit up and take notice?” I asked.
America has been awakened to the fact that the US Vaccine Program, both for children and adults, is a massive money-generating, but deadly, dangerous, hoax. Autism is but ONE of the problems vaccines cause.
It is likely that the anti-vaxxer movement in the US steered the presidential election towards Donald Trump – there is so much interest.
President Trump, before the inauguration, talked to Robert F. Kennedy Jr about he, Kennedy, heading up such a Vaccine Commission. Kennedy said he would. And, the liberal media began its shrill whining…
A keening of fear…
So let’s look at what will happen.
Do Federal Commissions Have Any Real Power?
Oh yeah – they certainly do.
Historically, Commissions in the United States have played prominent roles in US decision making. They come in different colors and sizes, and can have different functions depending on how they are originally set up, and by whom. Below I’ll show you some samples…
There is a war raging over adult (nonembryonic) stem cell use by licensed physicians right here in the USA…
It basically pits self-styled dogmatic skeptics, federally funded university researchers & research centers, the FDA, various medical groups and organizations, and some individual mainstream practitioners against hundreds of licensed MDs and DOs (and thousands of patients) who want to use the patient’s own stem cells to treat various afflictions, most being chronic in nature.
For those of us in the trenches doing stem cell medicine (Stem Cell Warriors), today’s tug-of-war is not only not news, but we saw the clouds gathering on the horizon back at the dawn of the new millennia.
It is a familiar story in the evolution of medicine: genuine innovation carries some low risk unknowns which prompts regulators and guardians of the status quo to seek to control and contain it, ostensibly to protect patients from harm.
Not surprisingly, the most strident voices advocating regulating innovation (progress) in adult stem cell use has invariably included federally funded laboratory scientists, ivory tower bioethicists, and others who have blinders on when it comes to how to effectively deliver low risk new therapies to the clinic.
Most display an arrogant disregard for suffering patients who have few or no treatment options, or else yammer on about how they are really protecting them from the horrors of “Wild West stem cell doctors” who just do whatever they want and this for the money involved – Never mind the fact they leave many of these suffering people no recourse but to rely on ineffective or marginally effective treatments by mainstream doctors, most of which have side or adverse effects that one never sees in patients given properly done in-office adult stem cell therapies).
I challenge you to look up the incidence of side effects that the average FDA approved drug has and to compare that number with the number of side effects and deaths that have occurred with the use of stem cells derived from the same patient’s body (autologous)!
Note from Tim Bolen – I have been involved with cutting-edge health care people for 30 plus years. The author I have recruited here for the BolenReport is an expert in, among other things, Adult Stem Cell Therapies. His book, “Umbilical Cord Stem Cell Therapy: The Gift of Healing from Healthy Newborns,” is an excellent entrance into the world of stem cells, and their existing and potential uses.
I have asked him to do answer three questions in his article series: (1) Why is the US health care system so bad? and (2)Why are adult stem cells, which repair damage to the body, being almost blocked for use in the US?, and (3) Would Adult Stem Cells reverse vaccine damage (autism)?
Let’s see what he has to say in the FIRST article in his series…
“My doctor told me to stick with things backed up by hard science”
As an integrative medicine expert with over forty years of practice under my belt, I cannot begin to count the times a patient came into my office and said, “I almost didn’t come in to see you, Dr. Steenblock, mainly because my regular doctor said what you do is not backed up by hard science (MORE LIKELY HE HAS NOT A CLUE ABOUT ANYTHING I DO). He also emphasized that I should stick with doctors whose practices are hard science based like his.”
There is a perverse, persuasive logic to this “we have it, they don’t” line of reasoning. The fact is though that conventional medicine’s claim that almost all of the things they do is indisputably predicated on hard science is a fallacy. I knew this forty years ago — spoke of it often down through the ensuing years — and am still doing so albeit with one difference: There is now a chorus of voices from within the world of standard medicine and science saying the same thing.
We could accurately say, “Half of what physicians do is wrong,” or “Less than 20 percent of what physicians do has solid research to support it.” Although these claims sound absurd, they are solidly supported by research that is largely agreed upon by experts. Yet these claims are rarely discussed publicly. It would be political suicide for our public leaders to admit these truths and risk being branded as reactionary or radical. Most Americans wouldn’t believe them anyway.
US Health Care is NOT Going to Be Fixed Without Some Radical Changes.
All throughout the Presidential Election process we heard arguments over what’s called “ObamaCare” (The Affordable Care Act). Strangely, there was little detail about was REALLY right or wrong with the system, nor exactly how to fix it – just a lot of hyperbole.
What Do We Really Know About “ObamaCare”?
The Good Parts – people who could not previously get access to health care actually got that access.
The Bad Parts – (1) Mandatory purchase – Everyone had to buy a Health Care Plan. (2) What is offered (mandated) is basically expensive junk.
Yes, you read that right – “expensive junk.”
The REALLY BAD Parts – Costs started to rise exponentially. Plan costs, already high, doubled.
Too often we, here, on the BolenReport, and other publications, talk about the problems of North American Health Care without pointing out, to our readers, that in the Health Freedom Movement WE WIN ALL OF THE TIME…
Part of the reason we win is that we openly communicate problems. And, when we do that there is an effect. We start the ball rolling.
Probably the biggest effect, right now, is that we have driven most of our front-line opposition into hiding – and that is a very important point.
So why, for example, are the supposedly “pro-vax, etc.,” people hiding? When you hunt them down, and drag them out into the light, all becomes evident. Look what we found when we examined nitwit David Gorski (Orac)’s network.
There is NO QUESTION that the monstrous Anti-Vax Movement is scaring the crap out of those that pretend to think that vaccines are safe and effective. Step outside and smell the fear in the air. The signs are everywhere.
Get ready to laugh – I have another story about frustrated pro-vax snivelers to entertain you with. We are dragging another batch of life’s detritus out into the light…
I want to apologize to everyone that are submitting “Comments” to the BolenReport and not seeing them pop up instantly.
I was inundated with “skeptic” crap – and decided to “monitor” all of the Comments. Since I have meetings, and other obligations, sometimes it is hours before I can get back to the Comment queue. Please, don’t go away – just put them there. They will appear.
Or you can send them to my email address. The information I am getting is WOW!!
As you know the “skeptics” live in a different world than those of us brought up with a kindness, and caring, family oriented Judeo-Christian Ethic. Their “Comments” are not something normal people would want to see, or hear. I think that if someone were to do what they do in a Public Park on a Saturday, the police would come, and take them away. Why is their behavior condoned on the internet?
As you know, Meryl Dorey, of the Australian Vaccination Network (AVN) was threatened with rape, mutilation, and death by the “skeptics.”
They sent Meryl, in her site’s “Comments” section, homosexual pornography, a photo of a white-woman-being-ripped-in-half-while-being-raped-by-a-black-man, and more. They also, of course, called her home and threatened her children with burning her house down in the middle of the night.. You can review that horror story here.
There is no question that Wikipedia is not our friend. It is obviously “Skeptic” Grand Dragon Home Base. Sifting though Wikipedia articles on health care is like being forced to listen to convicted pedophiles talk about their “conquests.”
Wikipedia Health articles are THAT horrible.
And, of course, when we study the “skeptic” leadership, and management picture, how that horror happens, becomes obvious.
I am a well known Crisis Management Consultant in health care. One of the tactics I use on behalf of clients is to set up campaigns that include, among other things, litigation. So, of course, it should be no surprise I am looking at what litigation, and PR campaign, would be necessary to bring Wikipedia down – just simply destroy it. Get it off the internet. Why destroy it? Because they have been asked nicely, time and time again to fix problems – and they answer with nastiness.
Frankly, I think it is time to just shut it down. Wikipedia has failed. It is simply a propaganda tool for the unwashed.
Can We Actually Destroy Wikipedia?
Of course we can. The whole Wikipedia thing is a sleight-of-hand trick, with Jimmy Wales pretending he has done something wonderful with five and ten dollar “contributions” from millions of people. That’s bullshit…
Robin Aris, up in Northern California, pointed out that, in my article about Mike Adam’s attack on the “skeptics” I didn’t go far enough explaining who Loren Pankratz’s “False Memory Syndrome” buddy Ralph Underwager was.