|
|
|
The Fundamental
Issues Coming Up
in the Geier Case...
Opinion by Consumer Advocate
Tim
Bolen
Thursday,
June 16th, 2011
A hearing will begin in Maryland in
front of an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)
tomorrow morning (June 17th, 2011) to
determine whether, or not, the Maryland
Board of Physicians had justifiable
cause to immediately suspend Mark Geier
MD's medical license. The hearing
could last up to a week before all of
the world-class Geier witnesses could be
heard.
But, in essence, what is really
happening here is that the State of
Maryland has a structure in place for
this sort of situation - sort of a
check and balance system. The
legal question to be adjudicated at this
hearing is NOT whether or not Mark Geier
MD did anything wrong in his medical
practice, but whether the Maryland Board
of Physicians followed "due process," in
yanking his license in this "emergency"
manner.
And, the Maryland Board of Physicians is
stumbling big time.
Why? The Maryland Board of
Physicians, in the Mark Geier MD case,
activated an emergency provision of
Maryland law under
(COMAR) 10.32.02, called
"Summary Suspension."
The
"Summary Suspension" section of this
law outlines the process by which such
an action can be taken.
Specifically, the Maryland Board of
Physicians activated the "Extraordinary
Circumstances" subsection (COMAR)
10.32.02.05 (B) (7) (a) (b), and (c)
which says:
(7) A
show cause notice may not be required in
extraordinary circumstances. The Board, after
consultation with the Board's counsel, may suspend a
license, registration, or certification without
prior notice and opportunity to be heard, if:
(a) The
Board determines that the health, welfare, and
safety of the public or the physician imperatively
requires immediate suspension;
(b)
Notice and opportunity to be heard before the action
is not feasible; and
(c) The
respondent is provided with a postdeprivation
opportunity to be heard by the Board within 15 days.
Starting tomorrow morning, the
Maryland Board of Physicians has the burden of proof
to show several things tomorrow, to the ALJ.
First, the Board must outline the "Extraordinary
Circumstances."
Then the board needs show to
all of the reasons why "(a)
The Board determines that the health, welfare, and
safety of the public or the physician
imperatively
requires immediate suspension;"
And then the Board needs show to all of the
reasons why "(b)
Notice and
opportunity to be heard before the action is not
feasible;"
Maryland law is very specific about the use of
this
(COMAR)
10.32.02.05 (B) (7) (a) (b), and (c)
emergency provision. Maryland law, like
all other States, is set up to protect the people
while, at the same time, establishing a system of
"due process," required by the US Constitution
Amendments number Five and Fourteen, as explained
below.
Tomorrow morning begins, frankly, the unraveling
of the scheme against the Geiers, and the beginning
of the consequences for the Maryland Board of
Physicians employees, agents, and co-conspirators.
Why? Because the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)
is NOT part of the Maryland Board, nor an employee
under the control of Joshua F. Scharfstein the head
of the Maryland Department of Health and Mental
Hygiene. From the law, here is what will
happen:
(2) After a full
evidentiary hearing, the administrative law judge
shall provide the Board with proposed findings of
fact and conclusions of law and proposed
disposition. The administrative prosecutor and
respondent may file exceptions in accordance with
Regulation .03F of this chapter. After the Board
issues its final order, the respondent may appeal
this decision in accordance with Regulation .03H of
this chapter.
As the Maryland Board has discovered in earlier
cases, if the ALJ says they don't have a case, any
decision contravening that gets them personally sued
in State or Federal Court under the "due process"
provisions - and case law shows the courts favor the
Plaintiff. Better, violations of "due process"
generally REMOVE the immunity provisions for public
employees, letting the Plaintiff go after those
Board Members', or State employees', personal
assets.
DUE PROCESS - A
fundamental, constitutional guarantee that all legal
proceedings will be fair and that one will be given
notice of the proceedings and an opportunity to be
heard before the government acts to take away one's
life, liberty, or property. Also, a constitutional
guarantee that a law shall not be unreasonable,
ARBITRARY, or capricious.
The constitutional
guarantee of due process of law, found in the Fifth
and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution,
prohibits all levels of government from arbitrarily
or unfairly depriving individuals of their basic
constitutional rights to life, liberty, and
property. The DUE PROCESS CLAUSE of
the
FIFTH AMENDMENT, ratified in 1791,
asserts that no person shall "be deprived of life,
liberty, or property, without due process of law."
This amendment restricts the powers of the federal
government and applies only to actions by it. The
Due Process Clause of the
FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, ratified in 1868,
declares,"[N]or shall any State deprive any person
of life, liberty, or property, without due process
of law" (§ 1). This clause limits the powers of the
states, rather than those of the federal government.
The Due Process
Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment has also been
interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court in the
twentieth century to incorporate protections of the
BILL OF RIGHTS, so that those
protections apply to the states as well as to the
federal government. Thus, the Due Process Clause
serves as the means whereby the Bill of Rights has
become binding on state governments as well as on
the federal government.
Just so we all
understand, very clearly, what is going
to happen, starting tomorrow...
Read, once again, what I wrote in a
earlier article:
The Maryland
Board of Physicians Has a History of
Ignoring Due Process - and Getting Sued
For It...
Just a few years ago an Alternative
Medicine Psychiatrist, Alice Lee-Bloem
MD, had a run-in with the Maryland Board
of Physicians, and before the case was
over the Maryland Board found itself
Defending in Federal Court in Baltimore
over issues of "Due Process" violations.
In short, very much like in the current
Mark Geier MD case, someone at the
Maryland Board had decided that they,
being godlike and all , didn't need to
follow any rules concerning rightful Due
Process.
Maryland Attorney Alan Dumoff and
Manhattan based Jacques Simons
immediately attacked Maryland in federal
court. The court ruled, however,
that since Maryland had not exhausted,
yet, the State mandated Administrative
Process that the court would not take
jurisdiction - and they forced them to
wade through the adminstrative process,
which they did.
Unfortunately for the State, the
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) made it
clear that the Maryland Board had NO
CASE against the doctor and recommended
Dismissal. The Maryland Board,
like most States, does NOT have to
accept the ALJ's decision, and can make
one of its own. But, standing
there waiting for the Board's Decision
were Alan Dumoff and Jacques Simons
ITCHING to get back into Federal Court,
now that the Administrative Process was
completed. The Board concurred
with the ALJ's recommendation. You
can read about this case
here.
But now we have the question once again
- Did the Maryland Board learn its
lesson, or will it be sued again in
Federal Court?
You can bet that the Geier's legal team
will show up tomorrow with razor sharp
battle axes, so to speak....
One little
note...
Kathleen
Seidel's little band of anonymous
supporters organized a campaign to cause
as much damage to the Geiers as possible
in the shortest possible time.
Geier supporters are gathering those
communications as evidence of an
organized conspiracy.
My advice to Seidel and the others -
make this process simple - type up a
list of your personal assets and forward
a copy to the Geiers. They, the
Geiers, will meet with their attorneys.
The Geiers will decide which third of
your assets they want, their attorneys
will decide which third of your assets
they want, and you can sell the rest to
pay for your defense. Why?
You have NO CHANCE of winning in court.
You did what you did. The record
of your activities has already been
copied.
Stay tuned.
Tim Bolen - Consumer
Advocate
|
About Bolen Report |
Contact |
News |
Library |
Newsletter Signup |
Search this site |
Back to
Home Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tags:
Joshua F. Scharfstein, Mark Geier MD, David Geier, Lupron for Autism,
Tim Bolen, Maryland Board of Physicians, Maryland Department of Health
and Mental Hygiene"
|
|
Copyright 2005-2011 by Jurimed Public Relations & Research Group |
All Rights Reserved |
|
|